Question

In: Economics

There were 2 major shocks to the US economy in 2007, which together lead to a...

There were 2 major shocks to the US economy in 2007, which together lead to a severe economic slowdown in 2008. One shock was related to oil prices; the other was related to the housing market. This question analyzes the effect of these two chocks on GDP using the AD/AS framework.

a) Draw typical AD and AS supply curves. Label the axis real GDP and aggregate price level. Label the equilibrium quantity Q1 and price P1. Data taken from the Department of Energy indicate that the average price of crude oil in the world increased from $54.63 per barrel on Jan. 5, 2007 to $92.93 on Dec. 28, 2007. Would an increase in oil prices cause a demand or a supply shock? Show in your diagram the effect of this shock by shifting the appropriate curve. What happens to GDP? Prices? Label the equilibrium quantity Q1 and price P1.

b) Again, draw typical AD and AS supply curves. The Housing Price index calculated that the average price of a US home fell by an average of 3.0% in the 12 months between Jan. 2007 and Jan. 2008. Would this increase cause a demand or a supply shock? Add to this second diagram another shift to illustrate the effect of this shock. What happens to GDP? Prices? Label the equilibrium quantity Q2 and price P2.

c)What is the net effect of the two shocks on GDP and prices –is there an increase, decrease or is the change indeterminate? Why?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer :

(a) :- Follwing below graph represents an economy with no shocks and is stable with equilibrium price level P and GDP level Q. Now increase in price of oil will effect the supply curve. so it will be a supply shock. This negative supply shock will shift AS curve to its left which will result in decrease in equilibrium GDP (Q1<Q) and increase in equilibrium price level (P1>P).

(b) :- Decrease in price of housing was due to a demand shock i.e. decrease in demand of housing. Now this shock will have decrease in both price level and GDP.

(c) :- We know that GDP falls in both the shocks so GDP will definetly decrease. But prices increase in negative supply shock while decrease on negative demand shock. The overall effect of both the shocks depends upon the elasticities of demand and supply curve i.e. an inelastic curve is less responsive to change in price while an elastic curve is more. Here in my diagram, the decrease in price due to demand shock is less than increase in price due to supply shock so overall price level will show increase.


Related Solutions

1. There were 2 major shocks to the US economy in 2007, which together lead to...
1. There were 2 major shocks to the US economy in 2007, which together lead to a severe economic slowdown in 2008. One shock was related to oil prices; the other was related to the housing market. This question analyzes the effect of these two chocks on GDP using the AD/AS framework. a) Draw typical AD and AS supply curves. Label the axis real GDP and aggregate price level. Label the equilibrium quantity Q1 and price P1. Data taken from...
The US economy was hit two shocks at the onset of the 2008 Global Financial crisis....
The US economy was hit two shocks at the onset of the 2008 Global Financial crisis. First, it faced a negative supply shock due to a doubling of the price of oil, large price increases in other commodities and the collapse of a domestic housing bubble. Soon after, a negative aggregate demand shock followed, as consumer optimism dropped, while a reduction in credit supply in the financial sector caused firms to cut back on their investment plans. Using the AS/AD...
Consider the goods and services market in Keynesian Theory. Which of the following shocks will lead...
Consider the goods and services market in Keynesian Theory. Which of the following shocks will lead to the most flattening of the IS curve. Use the following parameters: [G,T,r,a,b,io,i1]=[100,100,10,100,0.5,10,0.5] A. An increase in G by 10 units. B. Increase in Sensitivity of Investment to Change in Interest Rates (i1) from 0.5 to 1 C. A decrease in T by 10 units D. Decrease in Marginal Propensity to Consume from 0.5 to 0.25
Discuss briefly the three reasons why the US economy went into the Great Recession in 2007.
Discuss briefly the three reasons why the US economy went into the Great Recession in 2007.
Intermediate Macroeconomics True/False: a) Between 1870 and 2007 the US economy grew by 4% on average...
Intermediate Macroeconomics True/False: a) Between 1870 and 2007 the US economy grew by 4% on average per year. b) Frictional Unemployment is caused by structural changes in economic activity, such as movements from a manufacturing economy to a service economy. c) During the Great Recession GDP dropped by 4.5% (from peak to trough) and unemployment rate peaked at 10%. d) Monetary Policy is conducted by the Federal Reserve, while Fiscal Policy is conducted by the Federal Government. e) The full-employment...
2. What are the four major markets in the economy? Which variables are important in each...
2. What are the four major markets in the economy? Which variables are important in each of those markets. a. If two markets are in equilibrium, which arguments are offered to suggest that all markets are in equilibrium. b. What is LM Curve? c. What factors will shift the LM curve?
Due to the covid-19 pandemic, the US economy entered a downturn that would eventually lead to...
Due to the covid-19 pandemic, the US economy entered a downturn that would eventually lead to recession. Explain how Fiscal policy should be used to help the economy. Who do you think is most affected economically by this pandemic, consumers or producers? Explain your rationale.
What were the driving forces in the global economy that lead to the present Global gig...
What were the driving forces in the global economy that lead to the present Global gig economy?
How Morgan Stanley in 2007 lost $9B on subprime mortgage bets. What were the major assumptions...
How Morgan Stanley in 2007 lost $9B on subprime mortgage bets. What were the major assumptions in the fixed income models that went awry?
How Morgan Stanley in 2007 lost $9B on subprime mortgage bets. What were the major assumptions...
How Morgan Stanley in 2007 lost $9B on subprime mortgage bets. What were the major assumptions in the fixed income models that went awry?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT