Question

In one famous study (Rosenhan, 1973), eight healthy volunteers (“pseudopatients”) presented themselves to psychiatric hospitals. They told the admissions officers that they had been hearing voices. Except for this one lie, they answered all other questions truthfully. All pseudopatients were admitted to the hospitals, where they ceased to pretend they were hearing voices (in other words, they behaved ‘normally’). None of the pseudopatients were detected as sane. Rosenhan argued that the staff at the hospitals seemed to be operating under the null hypothesis that patients in a psychiatric hospital are insane.

In this study, did the hospital staff commit a Type I or Type II error in calling sane patients insane?

Which would be the more costly error? Why?

Answer 1

answer:

• the answer is TYPE II ERROR

THE EXPLANATION THE BELOW:

• In the given case we are really not dismissing the invalid speculation which is false. Henceforth, we are making a sort II mistake.

the another explanation is the below:

• The Rosenhan examination or Thud test was an analysis led to decide the legitimacy of mental finding. ... The investigation was led by clinician David Rosenhan, a Stanford University educator, and distributed by the diary Science in 1973 under the title "On being normal in crazy spots".
• Rosenhan claims that the investigation shows that specialists can't dependably differentiate between individuals who are normal and the individuals who are crazy.
• The fundamental investigation outlined an inability to distinguish rational soundness, and the optional examination showed an inability to identify madness.
• Truth be told, Rosenhan brushed the writing and found no case in which any patient announced hearing voices talking the words 'unfilled,' 'empty' and 'crash.' After being assessed, seven of the pseudopatients were determined to have schizophrenia and one with hyper depressive issue, or, in other words as bipolar issue.
• The fundamental working of St Elizabeths Hospital (1996), situated in Washington, D.C., now blocked and surrendered, was one of the destinations of the Rosenhan analyze
• The Rosenhan trial or Thud explore was a trial directed to decide the legitimacy of mental finding. The experimenters pretended mental trips to enter mental healing facilities, and acted regularly a short time later. They were determined to have mental disarranges and were given antipsychotic drugs.
• The investigation was led by analyst David Rosenhan, a Stanford University educator, and distributed by the diary Science in 1973 under the title "On being rational in crazy places".[1][2] It is considered an imperative and powerful feedback of mental diagnosis.[3]
• Rosenhan's examination was done in two sections.
• The initial segment included the utilization of solid partners or "pseudopatients" (three ladies and five men, including Rosenhan himself) who quickly pretended sound-related fantasies trying to pick up admission to 12 mental doctor's facilities in five states in the United States.
• All were conceded and determined to have mental disarranges. After confirmation, the pseudopatients acted typically and told staff that they felt fine and had never again encountered any extra fantasies.
• All were compelled to confess to having a psychological instability and needed to consent to take antipsychotic sedates as a state of their discharge.
• The normal time that the patients spent in the healing facility was 19 days. Everything except one were determined to have schizophrenia "disappearing" before their discharge.
• The second piece of his investigation included an outraged doctor's facility organization testing Rosenhan to send pseudopatients to its office, whom its staff would then identify.
• Rosenhan concurred and in the next weeks out of 250 new patients the staff recognized 41 as potential pseudopatients, with 2 of these getting doubt from no less than one therapist and one other staff part. Actually, Rosenhan had sent no pseudopatients to the clinic.
• While tuning in to an address by R. D. Laing, who was related with the counter psychiatry development,
• Rosenhan thought about the examination as an approach to test the dependability of mental diagnoses.
• [4] The investigation finished up "unmistakably we can't recognize the rational from the crazy in mental doctor's facilities" and furthermore delineated the threats of dehumanization and naming in mental organizations.
• It proposed that the utilization of network psychological well-being offices which focused on particular issues and practices as opposed to mental marks may be an answer, and prescribed instruction to make mental laborers more mindful of the social brain science of their offices.