Politicians often argue that a country's standard of living is reduced when it allows imports into...

Politicians often argue that a country's standard of living is reduced when it allows imports into the country. Offer an economically sound counter-argument.

Expert Solution

Politicians often argue that a country's standard of living is reduced when it allows imports into the country.

Its counter argument will be - a country's standard of living is increased when it allows imports into the country and this argument is very very correct. We can say this because as we know that when a country enters into international trade it is specialised in the production of such goods which they can produce efficiently and they import other goods. So when people import more goods it means that people now consume those goods also which they cant buy within the country so using a variety of goods and services increases the standard of living.

For example a country cant produce cars so if there are no imports than people have to live without cars but when import is allowed now people have the option to buy a car and hence raise their standard of living. Similarly many different items of daily use can be consumed.

It is also economical because if these goods are produced in home country it will be high priced due to higher cost but when imported from those countries who can produce it efficiently it becomes cheaper.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

policymakers, and politicians often argue that rising healthcare costs in the United States are bad, and...

policymakers, and politicians often argue that rising healthcare costs in the United States are bad, and use this to argue for policies to try to reduce prices. Using economics and the supply and demand framework: Explain why you should not reason or make policy based on the fact that prices are rising/falling. (2 points) Give two demand side and two supply side factors that might explain rising prices in the US (4 points)

Politicians who support the green movement often argue that it is profitable for firms to pursue...

Politicians who support the green movement often argue that it is profitable for firms to pursue a strategy that is “environmentally friendly” (for example, by building factories that do not pollute), because workers will be willing to work in environmentally friendly factories at a lower wage rate. Evaluate the validity of this claim. (15 points)

Question

Politicians often argue that a country's standard of living is reduced when it allows imports into...

Solutions

Expert Solution

Related Solutions

policymakers, and politicians often argue that rising healthcare costs in the United States are bad, and...

Politicians who support the green movement often argue that it is profitable for firms to pursue...

Identify the advantages and disadvantages of alternate measures of a country's standard of living.

Politicians are often blamed when the economy is shrinking. If a politician stated, "We are going...

Often when regional trade agreements are being negotiated, people argue that it is important that such...