In: Physics
Hobbis et al (Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58 (3), pp 1826–1833) thoroughly examined the properties of a niobium-iron-antimony semiconductor material. Although their reported synthetic procedure was a fairly straightforward stoichiometric melting and subsequent crystallization of the pure elements, they did not observe the predicted behavior of an intrinsic semiconductor. Instead, their compound was found to exhibit characteristics of a very lightly n-doped semiconductor instead. They hypothesize that this is due to the formation of so-called “antiphase domains” during crystallization, where the local pattern of atoms in small regions in the solid is the exact reverse of the rest of the crystal structure. Given the three elements involved, suggest an explanation (using a diagram if you find it helpful) for how this change in atomic pattern gives rise to n-type doping behavior.
According to my knowledge this must be the answer . The required graphs and conclusions that are drawn are in the form of images.
E= ( (Etot)APB - (Etot)bulk ) / (2*A)
(Etot)APB - the total energy of supercell contains an APB
(Etot)bulk - total energy of an equivallent supercell representing a ideal bulk crystal without APB
A - the cross-sectional area in (b*c)
and the factor 2 arises due to phase boundary structure of periodic boundary conditions.