Question

Currently, the two major sets of rules related to accounting are Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). How do the two systems differ? How are they similar? Do you think that GAAP and IFRS should converge? Explain. Your initial post should be 250-500 words, include at least one reference, and demonstrate solid academic writing skills.

Answer 1

Let’s look at the 10 biggest differences between IFRS and GAAP accounting.

1. Local vs. Global

IFRS is used in more than 110 countries around the world, including the EU and many Asian and South American countries. GAAP, on the other hand, is only used in the United States. Companies that operate in the U.S. and overseas may have more complexities in their accounting.

1. Rules vs. Principles

GAAP tends to be more rules-based, while IFRS tends to be more principles-based. Under GAAP, companies may have industry-specific rules and guidelines to follow, while IFRS has principles that require judgment and interpretation to determine how they are to be applied in a given situation.

1. Inventory Methods

Both GAAP and IFRS allow First In, First Out (FIFO), weighted-average cost, and specific identification methods for valuing inventories. However, GAAP also allows the Last In, First Out (LIFO) method, which is not allowed under IFRS. Using the LIFO method may result in artificially low net income and may not reflect the actual flow of inventory items through a company.

1. Inventory Write-Down Reversals

Both methods allow inventories to be written down to market value. However, if the market value later increases, only IFRS allows the earlier write-down to be reversed. Under GAAP, reversal of earlier write-downs is prohibited. Inventory valuation may be more volatile under IFRS.

1. Fair Value Revaluations

IFRS allows revaluation of the following assets to fair value if fair value can be measured reliably: inventories, property, plant & equipment, intangible assets, and investments in marketable securities. This revaluation may be either an increase or a decrease to the asset’s value. Under GAAP, revaluation is prohibited except for marketable securities.

1. Impairment Losses

Both standards allow for the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets when the market value of an asset declines. When conditions change, IFRS allows impairment losses to be reversed for all types of assets except goodwill. GAAP takes a more conservative approach and prohibits reversals of impairment losses for all types of assets.

1. Intangible Assets

Internal costs to create intangible assets, such as development costs, are capitalized under IFRS when certain criteria are met. These criteria include consideration of the future economic benefits.

Under GAAP, development costs are expensed as incurred, with the exception of internally developed software. For software that will be used externally, costs are capitalized once technological feasibility has been demonstrated. If the software will only be used internally, GAAP requires capitalization only during the development stage. IFRS has no specific guidance for software.

1. Fixed Assets

GAAP requires that long-lived assets, such as buildings, furniture and equipment, be valued at historic cost and depreciated appropriately. Under IFRS, these same assets are initially valued at cost, but can later be revalued up or down to market value. Any separate components of an asset with different useful lives are required to be depreciated separately under IFRS. GAAP allows for component depreciation, but it is not required.

1. Investment Property

IFRS includes the distinct category of investment property, which is defined as property held for rental income or capital appreciation. Investment property is initially measured at cost, and can be subsequently revalued to market value. GAAP has no such separate category.

1. Lease Accounting

While the approaches under GAAP and IFRS share a common framework, there are a few notable differences. IFRS has a de minimus exception, which allows lessees to exclude leases for low-valued assets, while GAAP has no such exception. The IFRS standard includes leases for some kinds of intangible assets, while GAAP categorically excludes leases of all intangible assets from the scope of the lease accounting standard.

GAAP and IFRS are alike in many ways, thus making the convergence a realizable task. The conceptual frameworks of both methods are very similar in structure, referring to their accounting objectives, elements, and qualitative characteristics. A major similarity between GAAP and IFRS is that both standards use an income statement, a balance sheet, and a statement of cash flows. When dealing with cash and cash equivalents, both methods are essentially the same. Another major similarity is that both GAAP and IFRS prepare financial statements on an accrued basis; meaning revenue is recognized when it is realized or realizable. There are many other similarities between GAAP and IFRS, and will therefore help in a complete convergence in the near future, but before there is one international financial accounting set of standards, the differences between GAAP and IFRS have to be taken into consideration.

In conclusion, it is important for economic globalization that GAAP converges with IFRS into one set of high-quality international standards. A unified set of accounting standards will provide companies, investors, creditors, financial users, etc. with helpful information that is relevant and reliable for making financial decisions. The similarities with GAAP and IFRS already provide some ease with the merge. And though there are still many differences, short-term and long-term efforts are in practice with hopes to merge GAAP and IFRS in the near future.