Question

In: Accounting

What services require auditors to be independent? How does an auditor decide whether to accept or...

What services require auditors to be independent? How does an auditor decide whether to accept or reject a client? What should the auditor consider?

Solutions

Expert Solution

IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants states: ‘Before accepting a new client relationship, a professional accountant in public practice shall determine whether acceptance would create any threats to compliance with the fundamental principles. Potential threats to integrity or professional behaviour may be created from, for example, questionable issues associated with the client (its owners, management or activities).’ This means that when approached to take on a new client, the firm should investigate the potential client, its owners and business activities in order to evaluate whether there are any questions over the integrity of the potential client which create unacceptable risk. These investigative actions are usually performed as ‘know your client/customer’ or ‘customer due diligence’ procedures, which are also carried out in order to comply with anti-money laundering regulations.

Once a client has been accepted, the firm should consider the suitability of the specific engagement it has been asked to perform. In particular there may be ethical threats which mean that the engagement should not be accepted, in particular whether there are any threats to objectivity. Potential threats could arise for example, if members of the audit firm hold shares in the client or there are family relationships. If threats are discovered, it may not mean that the client must be turned down, as safeguards could potentially reduce the threats to an acceptable level.

IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants states: ‘Before accepting a new client relationship, a professional accountant in public practice shall determine whether acceptance would create any threats to compliance with the fundamental principles. Potential threats to integrity or professional behaviour may be created from, for example, questionable issues associated with the client (its owners, management or activities).’ This means that when approached to take on a new client, the firm should investigate the potential client, its owners and business activities in order to evaluate whether there are any questions over the integrity of the potential client which create unacceptable risk. These investigative actions are usually performed as ‘know your client/customer’ or ‘customer due diligence’ procedures, which are also carried out in order to comply with anti-money laundering regulations.

Once a client has been accepted, the firm should consider the suitability of the specific engagement it has been asked to perform. In particular there may be ethical threats which mean that the engagement should not be accepted, in particular whether there are any threats to objectivity. Potential threats could arise for example, if members of the audit firm hold shares in the client or there are family relationships. If threats are discovered, it may not mean that the client must be turned down, as safeguards could potentially reduce the threats to an acceptable level.IFAC’s Code makes it clear that acceptance decisions are not to be treated as a one-off matter. The Code states: ‘It is recommended that a professional accountant in public practice periodically review acceptance decisions for recurring client engagements.’ Changes in the circumstances of either the client, or the audit firm may mean that an engagement ceases to be ethically or professionally acceptable or creates a heightened level of risk exposure. Therefore, client continuance assessments are important and should be fully documented.

ISA (NZ) 210 Agreeing the terms of the audit engagement establishes the preconditions for accepting an audit, which are:

an acceptable financial reporting framework has been used in the preparation of the financial statementsthose charged with governance agree that they acknowledge and understand their responsibilities.

If the preconditions for an audit are not present, the auditor must discuss the matter with those charged with governance. Unless required by law or regulation to do so, the auditor must not accept the engagement.

ISA (NZ) 220 Quality control for an audit of financial statements deals with those aspects of engagement acceptance that are within the control of the auditor. The engagement partner must be satisfied that appropriate procedures regarding the acceptance and continuance of client relationships and audit engagements have been followed, and must determine that conclusions reached in this regard are appropriate. PES 3 Quality control for firms that perform audits and reviews of financial statements, and other assurance engagements requires the firm to obtain information considered necessary in the circumstances before accepting an engagement with a new client, and when deciding whether to continue an existing engagement.


Related Solutions

What is MUS? What steps do auditors follow to execute a MUS? How does an auditor...
What is MUS? What steps do auditors follow to execute a MUS? How does an auditor evaluate the results of a MUS? What issues should auditors address before concluding that the auditee’s balances are misstated?
How does an auditor decide on the timing of control tests?
How does an auditor decide on the timing of control tests?
How does a company decide whether or not to shut down? What is the rule they...
How does a company decide whether or not to shut down? What is the rule they should follow? Explain in your own words what the rule would be.
A supermarket is trying to decide whether to accept or reject a shipment of tomatoes. It...
A supermarket is trying to decide whether to accept or reject a shipment of tomatoes. It is impossible to check all the tomatoes for size, but they desire an average weight of 8 ounces (they neither want too large nor too small). (a) State the hypotheses. (b) A random sample of 25 tomatoes yields an average weight of 7.65 ounces and a standard deviation of 1.15 ounces. Calculate the test statistic and the p-value. (c) Would you reject H0, or...
You are trying to decide whether to accept or reject a project. The project will generate...
You are trying to decide whether to accept or reject a project. The project will generate a cash flow of $15,000 in year one; $25,000 in year two; $20,000 in year three; and $4,000 in year four. The project costs $40,000 initially. The firm has a weighted average cost of capital of 8%. Your firm generally accepts projects that payback in three years or less. What is the discounted payback of the project? Should you accept or reject the project?
I want to use the IRR rule to decide whether to accept a project that has...
I want to use the IRR rule to decide whether to accept a project that has cash flows of -205, 295, 311 and -435. What do you advise if the company has a required return of 12%? Should they accept or not and what is the IRR %?
AFX Sdn Bhd is trying to decide whether to accept a business loan or a lease...
AFX Sdn Bhd is trying to decide whether to accept a business loan or a lease financing facility for an equipment purchase. The equipment cost $60,000 with 3-year economic life, depreciated annually based on MACRS 3-year class with the following rates: Year 1 = 33%; Year 2 = 45%; Year 3 = 15%; Year 4 = 7%. If AFX accepts the business loan option, the 3-year loan will attract an interest rate at 12% interest calculated on a yearly reducing...
How does a firm decide whether to shut down production in the short run and in...
How does a firm decide whether to shut down production in the short run and in the long run? Explain both scenarios Can a competitive firm earn positive profits in the long run? Explain.
Auditors are required to be “independent” and management accountants are called to be “objective”. how these...
Auditors are required to be “independent” and management accountants are called to be “objective”. how these two concepts are related and how they differ.
in each of these independent situations please decide whether the following items on the fact of...
in each of these independent situations please decide whether the following items on the fact of an OTHERWISE negotiable instrument renders the instrument non-negotiable? a) Note signed in the upper left hand corner b) Draft directing to pay out of next month's sales c) Note promising to pay in accordance with the mortgage terms d) Draft payable in 1000 euros e) Note payable upon your death f) Draft payable whenevr you present it to drawee g) Note promising to "Pay...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT