In: Accounting
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow
companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation
methods...
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow
companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation
methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare
periodic performance from firm to firm.
Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the
performance of two companies. Company A uses the
double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the
straight-line method. You have the following information taken from
the 12/31/18 year-end financial statements for Company B:
Income Statement |
|
Depreciation expense |
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Assets: |
|
Plant and equipment, at cost |
$ |
260,000 |
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(52,000 |
) |
|
Net |
$ |
208,000 |
|
|
|
You also determine that all of the assets constituting the plant
and equipment of Company B were acquired at the same time, and that
all of the $260,000 represents depreciable assets. Also, all of the
depreciable assets have the same useful life and residual values
are zero.
Required:
1. In order to compare performance with Company
A, estimate what B's depreciation expense would have been for 2015
through 2018 if the double-declining-balance depreciation method
had been used by Company B since acquisition of the depreciable
assets.
Double Declining Balance |
Year 1 |
|
Year 2 |
|
Year 3 |
|
Year 4 |
|
2. If Company B decided to switch depreciation
methods in 2018 from the straight line to the
double-declining-balance method, prepare the 2018 journal entry to
record depreciation for the year, assuming no journal entry for
depreciation in 2018 has yet been recorded.