In: Accounting
Explain whether you think IFRS and GAAP will be fully converged. What is the current status of convergence projects?
There has been a concerted
convergence effort between the Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) and the International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) in order to avoid conflict and confusion, promote
simplicity, streamlining, consistency and transparency, and avoid
any future financial crises or meltdowns.
Despite the research-indicated evidence of a higher accounting
quality being experienced by firms that either apply the IFRS
standards or have switched to them from the GAAP, the convergence
process has not proven to be an easy task, mostly because of the
differences in approach between the two accounting bodies.
The GAAP is a rules-based methodology, while the IFRS takes a
principle-based approach. The rules-based approach is comprised of
a complex set of guidelines that establishes criteria for every
possible contingency and provides the rules required for specified
transactions, thus promoting uniformity. The principle-based
methodology lays out the key objectives of good reporting in each
subject area and then provides guidance, explaining the objective,
and relates it to common examples, thus promoting transparency.
If these methodological differences between the two approaches cannot be resolved, they may prolong the process of compiling a true set of international accounting standards and increase the costs required to maintain two sets of books.
So from the above discussion it is clear that, IFRS and GAAP will be fully converged, but it will took a time.
current status of convergence projects
One of the main concerns in the
United States business world is how the convergence process and its
results will impact the future evolution of the accounting
profession. This specific concern, simply stated, is about
uniformity over transparency, and it has a serious impact on the
standards development process. Could the goals of uniformity and
transparency be achieved? Are they incompatible or mutually
exclusive?
This incompatibility - real or perceived - is grounded in the
conflicts existing among the constructs of rules-based and
principle-based shareholder and stakeholder primacy theories, which
are recognized by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB),
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the
European and Asian Accounting Standards Boards, and which have an
impact on the standards development methodology. Transparency has a
direct impact on the areas of business combinations (Phase I and
II), revenue recognition and financial performance of business
enterprises reporting. hence they are still in process.