Question

In cultures, individuals share a set of characteristics, such as language, religion, food, social habits and much more. Each culture also has cultural norms—or a shared set of standards, rules and behaviors—they follow that impact how people interact within their culture and the world around them. It’s vital to understand this because people’s culture often influences their thoughts, actions and behaviors. All cultures have unique characteristics. However, many countries around the world generally fall into two main types: individualistic or collectivist. Cultures within these categories can also be either “tight” or “loose” as well.

Explain individualistic culture, collectivist culture, and “tight or loose” culture, providing the main characteristics for each culture and supporting your answer with examples and citations from recent published articles (950-1000 words)

I'm a Bussiness Administration student studying management and this qusetion is for a course called "Exploring innovation and entrepreneurship". Any help would be highly aprreciated. Thank you in advance.

Answer 1

A collectivist culture is one that depends on esteeming the requirements of a gathering or a network over the person. Connection, family, and network are critical. Individuals will in general work together to make concordance and gathering union is amazingly esteemed.

For instance, youngsters in collectivist social orders are probably going to deal with older guardians on the off chance that they become sick and will change their own arrangements in case of a family crisis.

Individualistic culture is a general public which is portrayed by independence, which is the prioritization or accentuation of the person over the whole gathering. Individualistic societies are situated around oneself, being free as opposed to relating to a gathering mentality.In individualistic societies, individuals are considered "acceptable" in the event that they are solid, confident, self-assured, and autonomous. A couple of nations that are viewed as individualistic societies incorporate the US, Germany, Ireland, South Africa, and Australia.

Tight and loose culture

Tight societies, as characterized by Gelfand in her book, "Rule Producers, Rule Breakers: How Close and Free Societies Wire Our Reality," are those in which accepted practices are obviously characterized and dependably forced, generally ruling out individual spontaneous creation and translation. Instances of nations with tight societies incorporate China, France, India, Japan and Singapore.

Free societies are those in which accepted practices are adaptable and casual. They propose desires yet license people to characterize the scope of passable conduct inside which they may practice their own inclinations. In this way, implementation in free societies is left to relational systems. Instances of nations with free societies incorporate Australia, Belgium, Israel, New Zealand and the US.

Institutional components administer conduct in close societies, as indicated by research by Brian Gunia. People from these societies depend on institutional trust more than relational trust to control conduct and authorization abnormality. Since relational systems oversee conduct in free societies, the specific inverse is valid. Individuals from tight societies, along these lines, needn't bother with social insight to discover who is reliable as trust isn't expected to lead business, while those in free societies must discover all alone.

Applying these ideas to the instance of American official Robert Z., obviously the Indian man he was endeavoring to cooperate with simply had little fitness in the abilities required to construct trust with an American. This had not been expected of him inside Indian normal practices. He had depended on the family name and notoriety of an accomplice, associations, institutional affiliations, outsiders, etc. American accepted practices are looser, requiring the American to apply aptitudes of individual trust-working in one-on-one circumstances.