Question

In: Accounting

On 30 June 2019, Ollivanders Ltd., a firm specialising in magical wands, estimated warranty claims for...

On 30 June 2019, Ollivanders Ltd., a firm specialising in magical wands, estimated warranty claims for the twelve months just finished at $10,000.  But, during the next twelve months it recorded claims for faulty wands of $30,000.  The manager assessed the product line that caused the blow out in estimated claims and concluded that the estimate for warranty claims at the end of the year on 30 June 2020 should only be $5,000.

Consider the effect of the decision and suggest reasons why the manager might make such an assessment.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Effect of decision-

The company had made estimation of $ 10,000,however the estimation failed and the warranty cliam of $30,000 has been recorded. It means if company is using provisional basis [ which company is using actually] then company will be making warranty expense provison of $ 25,000 [10000-30000-5000] in current year books of accounts i.e 2020.

Manager decision-

The manager has worked out the reason which lead to a claim of high amount in year 2020.There may be any problem with any production process which would have been making breakage or defects during the 2020 & manager might have worked out on the same process and corrected it with the efforts of organisational employees or outsiders, hence manager is so confident to create the provision lower than the exepected claims which is in variance with the claims of previous two year.

A practical example of it could be taken as HTC [Taiwan Co.] had introduced a smart phone with high promotion and investment in 2014-2015. where this product has problem of breakage and in the end company decided to withdraw the product from market and replaced it's existing product with other one. The product version was HTC desire 820s.In the end the company replaced all the broken smartphones with HTC desire 820G.

In The HTC scenario above case may be fit as HTC has beleive that It can't carry with such product and it also started to not to sale already produced smartphone of such version.

Hence manager might have known the reason of breakage that why he seems in too much of confident.

As a auditor you would be arguing in favor of increasing the provison for warranty claims and asking the manager for supporting evidence in favor of not to increase the provisonns.

Even then the manager does not provide with the relevent informaion related to adudit then auditor has only onw way to follow to describe this point as key audit matter as it seems lower in value.

Please comment for any additional explantion,

Thanks,


Related Solutions

The balances in the accounts of Maybe Ltd at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020...
The balances in the accounts of Maybe Ltd at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020 are: 30th June 2020 ‘000 30th June 2019 ‘000 Sales (all on credit) 300 420 Cost of Goods Sold 156 132 Doubtful Debts expense 30 36 Interest Expense 24 36 Salaries 36 30 Depreciation 12 18 Cash 172.80 166.80 Inventory 216 192 Accounts Receivable 324 300 Allowance for Doubtful Debts 36 42 Land 180 180 Plant 120 108 Accumulated Depreciation 24 36 Bank Overdraft...
The balances in the accounts of Maybe Ltd at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020...
The balances in the accounts of Maybe Ltd at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020 are: 2020 ‘000 2019 ‘000 Sales (all on credit) 300 420 Cost of Goods Sold 156 132 Doubtful Debts expense 30 36 Interest Expense 24 36 Salaries 36 30 Depreciation 12 18 Cash 172.80 166.80 Inventory 216 192 Accounts Receivable 324 300 Allowance for Doubtful Debts 36 42 Land 180 180 Plant 120 108 Accumulated Depreciation 24 36 Bank Overdraft 24 22.80 Accounts Payable...
The balances in the accounts of Maybe Ltd at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020...
The balances in the accounts of Maybe Ltd at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2020 are: 30th JUNE 2020 ‘000 30th JUNE 2019 ‘000 Sales (all on credit) 300 420 Cost of Goods Sold 156 132 Doubtful Debts expense 30 36 Interest Expense 24 36 Salaries 36 30 Depreciation 12 18 Cash 172.80 166.80 Inventory 216 192 Accounts Receivable 324 300 Allowance for Doubtful Debts 36 42 Land 180 180 Plant 120 108 Accumulated Depreciation 24 36 Bank Overdraft...
Gundagai Ltd was incorporated on June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the company issued a...
Gundagai Ltd was incorporated on June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the company issued a prospectus offering 300,000 ordinary shares at an issue price of $10, payable on the following terms. $3 on application $3 on allotment $2 on the first call $2 on the second call A summary of the applications and allotments register follows. Amount paid per share on application Number of shares applied for Number of shares allotted $3.00 200,000 150,000 $6.00 100,000 100,000 $10.00 50,000...
Gundagai Ltd was incorporated on June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the company issued a...
Gundagai Ltd was incorporated on June 30, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the company issued a prospectus offering 300,000 ordinary shares at an issue price of $10, payable on the following terms. $3 on application $3 on allotment $2 on the first call $2 on the second call A summary of the applications and allotments register follows. Amount paid per share on application Number of shares applied for Number of shares allotted $3.00 200,000 150,000 $6.00 100,000 100,000 $10.00 50,000...
At 30 June 2019, the financial statements of McMaster Ltd showed a building with a cost...
At 30 June 2019, the financial statements of McMaster Ltd showed a building with a cost of $300 000 and accumulated depreciation of $152 000. The business uses the straight-line method to depreciate the building. When acquired, the building’s useful life was estimated at 30 years and its residual value at $60 000. On 1 January 2020, McMaster Ltd made structural improvements to the building costing $94 000. Although the capacity of the building was unchanged, it is estimated that...
At 30 June 2019, the financial statements of McMaster Ltd showed a building with a cost...
At 30 June 2019, the financial statements of McMaster Ltd showed a building with a cost (net of GST) of $372,000 and accumulated depreciation of $188,000. The business uses the straight-line method to depreciate the building. When acquired, the building's useful life was estimated at 30 years and its residual value at $74,000. On 1 January 2020, McMaster Ltd made structural improvements to the building costing $117,000 (net of GST). Although the capacity of the building was unchanged, it is...
18. On 30 June 2019, the end of the current reporting period, Kirk Ltd made a...
18. On 30 June 2019, the end of the current reporting period, Kirk Ltd made a decision, using the information obtained over the past few years, to revise the useful life of acquired five years earlier on 1 July 2014 for $1 000 000. The useful life was revised from ten years to 15 years. The building was originally depreciated on the straight-line basis over its useful life and it was expected that the building would have no residual value....
The following information was derived from the book of Fast Ltd on 30 June 2019. Plant...
The following information was derived from the book of Fast Ltd on 30 June 2019. Plant Vehicle Carrying amount ? $64,000 Fair value $276,000 $63,000 Value in use $260,000 $63,200 Cost of disposal $4,000 $500 Additional information: (a) Fast Ltd depreciates all of its Property, Plant & Equipment items at 10% per annum using the straight-line method with zero residual value. (b) The Asset Revaluation Surplus for plant has a credit balance of $7,000 on 30 June 2019, as the...
The balance sheet of Murdoch Pty Ltd as at 30 June 2019 reveals the following information:...
The balance sheet of Murdoch Pty Ltd as at 30 June 2019 reveals the following information: $(‘000s) Paid-up Capital (1,000,000 shares) 3,000 Bank Overdraft 1,000 Accounts Payable 1,500 Mortgage Bonds, $1,000 face value (10%) 4,000 You are also given the following additional information about the firm: a) The company’s marginal tax rate is 30 cents in a dollar. The proportion of tax collected from the company that is claimed by shareholders is 0.6. b) The market price per mortgage bond...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT