In: Physics
In light of quantum mechanics and relativity theory, pragmatism is the best approach to understanding the nature of reality than either materialism or idealism. is this correct?
Quantum mechanics was a revolutionary idea of studying reality in a different approach. The world we see around us certainly does not match the bigger picture drawn by quantum mechanics. Whereas, classical mechanics fits more appropriately in the picture that we call reality. At its inception, quantum mechanics was critised by both physicists as well as phylosophers. But with advancement of the theory, quantum mechanics provided more and more realistic explanation of the events that classical mechanics failed to explain and today its like every physical phenomenon needs a quantum level interpretation.
On the contrary, theory of relativity provided fascinating events which is nothing less than what we see in science fiction. The theory also questions our view of reality. Now its pretty mind boggling to answer "What is reality?".
However, we are yet to reconcile theory of relativity with quantum mechanics.
Now if the interpretation these two theories are based without any paradox, then we can use the phylisophy of monistic idealism. But everyone knows paradox exists in both of its interpretation. So I think it wont be correct to say that the best approach to understand these theories would be materialism or idealism.