In: Statistics and Probability
A component manufacturer wishes to measure the quality of five
different
methods of production of components. An experiment to test this
was
conducted with a one-way layout, where the response being measured
was
the lifetime of the components when tested to destruction, measured
in
units of 106 seconds. The data is shown in Dataset.
Carry out an
appropriate statistical test to see if anyone of the five methods
has
produced better components than the others, as measured by their
lifetime.
Dataset:
Method 1 | Method 2 | Method 3 | Method 4 | Method 5 |
102.57 | 101.97 | 101.48 | 100.69 | 100.80 |
101.52 | 102.13 | 102.53 | 101.45 | 100.33 |
100.21 | 99.25 | 99.06 | 99.45 | 98.69 |
99.35 | 99.73 | 100.85 | 101.77 | 101.85 |
101.46 | 100.36 | 99.40 | 100.31 | 101.07 |
100.32 | 100.70 | 100.23 | 99.89 | 100.18 |
99.21 | 100.36 | 99.33 | 98.94 | 97.88 |
97.42 | 98.15 | 98.82 | 98.60 | |
98.19 | 97.23 | 98.34 | 99.82 | |
98.67 |
Solution
The solution is based on One-way Analysis of Variance with unequal number of observations per treatment.
Final answer is given below. Back-up Theory and Details of Calculations follow at the end.
ANOVA Table |
Alpha = 0.05 |
|||||
Source |
DF |
SS |
MS |
F |
Fcrit |
p-value |
Method |
4 |
1.1283 |
0.28207108 |
0.138013 |
2.612306 |
0.9671866 |
Error |
39 |
79.708 |
2.04380483 |
|||
Total |
43 |
80.837 |
1.87992262 |
|||
Decision: Since F < Fcrit or equivalently, since p-value < alpha, null hupothesis of no difference in means between the five methods is accepted. Conclusion: We conclude that the different methods do not differ in terms of the life term of the components. Answer |
Back-up Theory
Suppose we have data of a 1-way classification ANOVA, with r rows/columns, and ni observations per cell.
Let xij represent the jth observation in the ith row/column, j = 1,2,…,n; i = 1,2,……,r
Then the ANOVA model is: xij = µ + αi + εij, where µ = common effect, αi = effect of ith row, and εij is the error component which is assumed to be Normally Distributed with mean 0 and variance σ2.
Hypotheses:
Null hypothesis: H01: α1 = α2 = ….. = αr = 0 Vs Alternative: H11: at least one αi is different from other αi’s.
Now, to work out the solution,
Terminology:
Row/column total = xi..= sum over j of xij
Grand total = G = sum over i of xi.
Correction Factor = C = G2/N, where N = total number of observations = r x n
Total Sum of Squares: SST = (sum over i,j of xij2) – C
Row/column Sum of Squares: SSR = {(sum over i of xi.2)/ni} – C
Error Sum of Squares: SSE = SST – SSR
Mean Sum of Squares = Sum of squares/Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of Freedom:
Total: N (i.e., rn) – 1;
Rows: (r - 1);
Error: Total - Row
Fobs: MSR/MSE;
Fcrit: upper α% point of F-Distribution with degrees of freedom n1 and n2, where n1 is the DF for the numerator MS and n2 is the DF for the denominator MS of Fobs
Significance: Fobs is significant if Fobs > Fcrit
Details of Calculations
alpha |
0.05 |
||
#treat |
5 |
||
n1 |
9 |
n4 |
7 |
n2 |
9 |
n5 |
9 |
n3 |
10 |
||
N |
44 |
||
x1. |
900.25 |
x4. |
702.50 |
x2. |
899.88 |
x5. |
899.22 |
x3. |
998.71 |
||
G = x.. |
4400.56 |
||
C |
440112.0071 |
||
Sx1j^2 |
90072.1725 |
Sx4j^2 |
70507.2458 |
Sx2j^2 |
89996.8978 |
Sx5j^3 |
89857.5516 |
Sx3j^2 |
99758.9761 |
||
Sxij^2 |
440192.8438 |
||
Sxi.^2/ni |
440113.1354 |
||
SST |
80.83667273 |
||
SSR |
1.128284314 |
||
SSE |
79.70838841 |
DONE