In: Economics
The issue of who takes care of the elderly parents is modeled as a game of chicken with asymmetrical preferences as follows;
Table 1
|
Husband |
||
Wife |
|
Take care |
Don’t take care |
|
Take care |
2,2 |
1,3 |
|
Don’t take care |
3,1 |
0,0 |
Table 1 - who should care for the elderly parents as a chicken game?
For each player it is best to do the opposite of what the other player does, and there is no obviously dominant outcome.
Draw and explain the new payoffs matrix.
a) IN THE GIVEN MATRIX BEHAVIOUR OF HUSBAND AND WIFE ARE GIVEN. THEY HAVE TWO CHOICES, EITHER THEY CARE FOR PARENTS OR THEY DON'T CARE FOR PARENTS. IF BOTH OF THEM CARE FOR PARENTS THEY WILL HAVE PAYOFF OF 2 EACH WHERE BOTH WILL BE BETTER OFF AND PARETO OPTIMALITY WILL BE ACHIVED.THIS IS THE NASH EQUILIBRIUM OF THE GAME. AGAIN IF HUSBAND CARE AND WIFE DON'T CARE THEN HUSBAND WILL BE BETTER OFF AND WIFE WILL BE WORSE OFF AND THAT WILL NOT SATISFY PARETO OPTIMALITY. THE REVERSE WILL HAPPEN WHEN WIFE CARE AND HUSBAND DON'T CARE. THEN OLSO PARETO OPTIMALITY IS VIOLATED. IN LAST CASE IN BOTH DOES'T CARE BOT WILL RECIEVE A PAYOFF OF 0 EACH AND BOTH WILL BE WORSE OFF.
THUS THE BEST STRATEGY WILL BE TO TAKE CARE AND BOTH WILL BE
BETTER OFF.
THE WORST STRATEGY WILL BE DON'T CARE AND BOTH WILL BE WORSE
OFF.
b) IN CASE THEY BOTH LIVE IN BEIJING AND ARE SINGLE CHILD THEY
HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF THEIR PARENTS. NOW THE HUSBAND WILL SURELY
TAKE CARE BUT THE WIFE WILL TAKE CARE MORE FOR TWO REASONS: 1.
SINCE THEY ARE FROM THE GENERATION OF ONE CHILD POLICY THEY ARE
VALUED TO TAKE CARE OF ELDERS. 2. WIFE MAY TAKE CARE OUT OF PEER
PRESURE.
FOR ANY OF THE REASON OR BOTH WIFE HAS TO TAKE CARE AND AS A RESULT
HER PAYOFF WILL INCREASE. TO BE NOTED HUSBAND'S PAYOFF WILL BE THE
SAME. THE EXECTED PAYOFF MAY BE AS FOLLOWS:
HUSBAND | |||
WIFE | CARE | DON'T CARE | |
CARE | 3,2 | 1,4 | |
DON'T CARE | 4,1 | 0,0 |