Question

In: Accounting

Dayan Plc: Investment decisons Suzy is a company located in Duabi. The company manufactures machine parts...

Dayan Plc: Investment decisons

Suzy is a company located in Duabi. The company manufactures machine parts in Oman. It is currently involved in making a decsion concerning the acquisition of new machining tool. Two different versions of the tool are available: Y & Z. The results of NPV and IRR of the two alternatives are summarized below:

Tools Net Present Value (NPV) Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Y AED 68.36m 10.5%

Z AED 55.52m 14.6%

Suzy faces a perfect capital market, in which the interest rate for the projects' risk level is 6%.

Required:

(a) On the basis of NPV and IRR findings above, formulate your investment decision advice.

(b) Using NPV decision rule for mutually exclusive projects, indicate which tools the company shoud accept.

(c) Using IRR decison rule for mutually exclusive projects, indicate which tools the company should accept.

(d) Do your conclusion in (b) and (c) similar? If no, which one is more superior to the other?

(e) State clearly any limitations and assumptions that you made in your calculations.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Whenever there is a conflict in ranking of projects based on NPV and IRR, it is safer to always prefer the NPV ranking. This is due to the realistic assumption and theoretical soundness of the method.

a) On the basis of NPV, tool Y having Net present value of AED 68.36m should be selected.

On the basis of IRR, tool Z with higher IRR will be selected.

This is since because higher the NPV and higher the IRR, greater the amount by which it exceeds the cost of capital, the higher the net cash flows to the investor.

b)Mutually exclusive projects are projects in which acceptance of one project excludes the others from consideration.

Using NPV decision rule for mutually exclusive projects - Tool Y with Higher NPV selected

c)Using IRR decison rule for mutually exclusive projects - Higher the IRR, high the fesibility of the project.So Tool Z is selected.

d). No.

Decesion in (b) and (c) are different because on coparrison based on NPV tool Y is selected while on comparssion based on IRR Tool Z is selected.

Since NPV is an absolute measure and IRR is a relative measure Tool Y is more superior to tool Z.

e). NPV vs IRR conflict also arises due to the different cash flow distribution. IRR inherently assumes that any cash flows can be reinvested at the IRR. This assumption is unrealistic because there is no guarantee that reinvestment at IRR can be achieved. NPV on the other hand assumes reinvestment at the cost of capital, which is conservative and realistic.


Related Solutions

XYZ is a company located in Italy, the company manufactures machine parts. It is currently involved...
XYZ is a company located in Italy, the company manufactures machine parts. It is currently involved in making a decision concerning the acquisition of new machining tool. Two different versions of the tool are available: X AND Y. The forecasted cash flows of the two alternative are listed below; XYZ normally uses payback with a 3-year criterion. NET CASH FLOWS ($000s) Tool X Year 0 -1000, Year 1 +400, Year 2 +600, Year 3 +187, Tool Y Year 0 -450,...
Roten Manufacturing Company is considering an investment on a machine for producing auto parts. The machine...
Roten Manufacturing Company is considering an investment on a machine for producing auto parts. The machine costs $250,000 today, will have a five-year life and will be depreciated over a five-year life on a straight-line basis toward a zero salvage value. The company paid a consulting company $7,000 last year to help them decide whether there is a sufficient demand for the auto parts. In addition to the investment on the machine, the company also invests $15,000 in net working...
Greenwood Plc is an organization that manufactures machine components. You are appointed as a trainee accountant...
Greenwood Plc is an organization that manufactures machine components. You are appointed as a trainee accountant in Greenwood Plc and finance manager has asked you to prepare a report analyzing the financial statements of the organization to assess the performance for the last two years. The summarized statements of profit or loss for the years ended 31st Dec 2019 and 2018 were:    2019 2018 RO ‘000’ RO ‘000’ Sales revenues 475,300 281,700 Cost of sales 332,740 176,100 Gross profit...
Greenwood Plc is an organization that manufactures machine components. You are appointed as a trainee accountant...
Greenwood Plc is an organization that manufactures machine components. You are appointed as a trainee accountant in Greenwood Plc and finance manager has asked you to prepare a report analyzing the financial statements of the organization to assess the performance for the last two years.The summarized statements of profit or loss for the years ended 31st Dec 2019 and 2018 were: 2019 2018 RO ‘000’ RO ‘000’ Sales revenues 475,300 281,700 Cost of sales 332,740 176,100 Gross profit 142,560 105,600...
Ntiwa Limited is a company that manufactures machine parts. Serwaa Limited has offered them a year...
Ntiwa Limited is a company that manufactures machine parts. Serwaa Limited has offered them a year contract to produce a special type of part for one of its machines. Ntiwa Limited has an existing machine that was purchased about 10 years ago and it can only be used for the contract offered by SerwaaLimited. The machine has so far been depreciated by GHC10, 000. Meanwhile, its original cost was GHC24, 000. The value of the machine in the books of...
Gobin plc is a furniture manufacturer in the located in Scotland and trading on the London...
Gobin plc is a furniture manufacturer in the located in Scotland and trading on the London Stock Exchange. The firm has a beta of 1.2. The historical rate of return on the FTSE All-Share index (i.e., the market portfolio) is 14% and the risk-free rate of return in the United Kingdom is currently at 6%. Managers at Gobin plc are planning to issue corporate bonds with a rate of 7.20%. The market value of the bonds is £250 million and...
Sakura PLC is a leading investment company in Australia and you the below details relating to...
Sakura PLC is a leading investment company in Australia and you the below details relating to the capital structure of the company. Information concerning raising new capital Bonds $1,000 Face value 13% Coupon Rate (Annual Payments) 20 Term (Years) $25 Discount offered (required) to sell new bonds $10 Flotation Cost per bond Preference Shares 11% Required rate to sell new preference shares $100 Face Value $3 Flotation cost per share Ordinary Shares $83.33 Current Market Price $4.00 Discount on share...
Investment Appraisal for Estia plc - The smart oven project Estia plc, is a large, established...
Investment Appraisal for Estia plc - The smart oven project Estia plc, is a large, established and fast-growing manufacturer of home appliances. The company is highly profitable and cash-rich and has hired your management consulting company to advise the Board on a new investment project. In the previous meeting of the Board, the CEO has presented two alternative options for the development of a new smart oven. The new oven will function as a normal oven but will also allow...
Investment Appraisal for Estia plc - The smart oven project Estia plc, is a large, established...
Investment Appraisal for Estia plc - The smart oven project Estia plc, is a large, established and fast-growing manufacturer of home appliances. The company is highly profitable and cash-rich and has hired your management consulting company to advise the Board on a new investment project. In the previous meeting of the Board, the CEO has presented two alternative options for the development of a new smart oven. The new oven will function as a normal oven but will also allow...
Auto Parts, Inc. is medium-sized company that manufactures auto parts in Buffalo, New York. The company...
Auto Parts, Inc. is medium-sized company that manufactures auto parts in Buffalo, New York. The company currently loses $30,000 per month. The owner of the company is evaluating whether she should shut down the factory. She thinks that the factory should continue to operate until the economic environment improves and buyer for the factory can be identified. The logic of the owner is that her company has already invested millions of dollars in the factory over the years. The monthly...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT