Make an argument, supported by sources and facts as the whether or not IG and PP...

Make an argument, supported by sources and facts as the whether or not IG and PP are positive or negative forces for democracy.

Expert Solution

We believe IG and PP are positive forces of the democracy.

Congress and the American people depend on inspectors general to enable the legislature to run all the more effectively and reasonably. Inspectors general don't generally prevail in this point, however subverting the organization could be impeding to oversight.
Inspectors general ought to be chosen regardless of political association and exclusively based on honesty and showed capacity in fields like budgetary administration, law, and policy management.

The firings of various Inspectors General is phenomenal; doing as such without great motivation impacts the freedom basic to their motivation. It is a danger to responsible majority rules system and a crevice in the constitutional level of influence.
Romney is the main Senate Republican who casted a ballot to convict Trump of maltreatment of intensity prior this year.
Top Democrats who blamed the President for taking part in an example of counter against local officials accused of oversight of his organization.
While Trump has the ability to fire inspectors general, who, as official branch nominees, serve at the joy of the president.

However, IGs are entrusted with inspecting and examining that equivalent official branch — a vocation that could turn out to be progressively testing if these authorities face counter for what they review and explore.
So we do believe they are very important part of the democratic society.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

Make a Constitutional-legal Argument as to whether or not President Trump had the constitutional authority to...

Make a Constitutional-legal Argument as to whether or not President Trump had the constitutional authority to use National Emergency. Legislation to divert Federal Funds appropriated for Construction in the Defense Department and divert that money to construction of the border wall.

Make an argument that Facebook is indeed a monopoly. In developing your argument make sure to...

Make an argument that Facebook is indeed a monopoly. In developing your argument make sure to address relevant ideas such as competition, conditions for emergence of a monopoly, profit maximization and the like. Discuss the potential consequences of a Facebook monopoly and what, from a public policy perspective might be done about it?

In your own words, but supported by facts and examples, explain how the theories in Group...

In your own words, but supported by facts and examples, explain how the theories in Group 1 differ from those in Group 2. GROUP 1 social exchange age stratification political economy social construction social phenomenology feminist gerontology life course perspective GROUP 2 Activity Disengagement Continuity (Minimum 2 paragraphs) ASAP.

A. Decide whether each passage should be thought of as containing no argument, one argument, or...

A. Decide whether each passage should be thought of as containing no argument, one argument, or more than one argument. For each argument, determine whether it is simple or complex (whether it contains only one or more than one inference), pick out any premise or conclusion indicators, and identify each premise and conclusion. example: 1. The snow is making driving conditions very dangerous. But I must still go out and vote, even though my candidate has no chance of winning....

Explain why “social Darwinism” seemed like a logical extension of Darwin’s argument and supported the racist...

Explain why “social Darwinism” seemed like a logical extension of Darwin’s argument and supported the racist notions to which all humans are subject to.

Remember, to be persuasive, you must use facts and logic. Identify the sources of information that...

Remember, to be persuasive, you must use facts and logic. Identify the sources of information that you use, and don’t draw general conclusions from specific incidents. The 2010 Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Comstock made it permissible to use civil commitment to further detain sexually dangerous offenders beyond their date of scheduled release. This means that a person can be convicted, sentenced, serve their entire sentence and be scheduled for release but still detained. In your post, discuss...

For each of the following questions, use alternative sources to supplement facts from the text to...

For each of the following questions, use alternative sources to supplement facts from the text to support your answers. Please provide references for any source used. 1a. Describe the revenue and collection cycle, including typical source documents. 1b. Identify significant accounts and relevant assertions related to the revenue and collection cycle. 1c. Identify important internal control activities present in a properly designed system to mitigate the risk of material misstatements for each relevant assertion in the revenue and collection cycle....

discuss the relationship between your own opinions and the facts and opinions in the sources you...

discuss the relationship between your own opinions and the facts and opinions in the sources you will use in your research paper. Should you put any of your opinions in a research paper? If so, how should the sources relate to your own opinions? Which should seem to control the argument of your paper: your opinions or those of your sources?

State whether the following passages contain an argument. Explain your answer by defining the concept of an argument and applying it.

State whether the following passages contain an argument. Explain your answer by defining the concept of an argument and applying it. If the passages do contain an argument, identify the premises and the conclusions. (Each answer is worth 4 marks.) 1. Socrates and Plato are philosophers. All philosophers hate tomatoes. Hence, Socrates and Plato hate tomatoes. 2. Chaser is either a philosopher or a poet. He is definitely not a poet. Consequently, Chaser is a philosopher.

Exercise 1.13.5: Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether...

Exercise 1.13.5: Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether each argument is valid or invalid. First find the form of the argument by defining predicates and expressing the hypotheses and the conclusion using the predicates. If the argument is valid, then use the rules of inference to prove that the form is valid. If the argument is invalid, give values for the predicates you defined for a small domain that demonstrate the argument...

Question