Question

In: Computer Science

Prove the validity using laws of propositional logic and rules of inference: ∀x(P(x) → (Q(x) ∧...

Prove the validity using laws of propositional logic and rules of inference:

∀x(P(x) → (Q(x) ∧ S(x)))

∃x(P(x) ∧ R(x))

− − − − − − − − − − − − −

∴ ∃x(R(x) ∧ S(x))

Solutions

Expert Solution

given

∀x(P(x) → (Q(x) ∧ S(x)))

∃x(P(x) ∧ R(x))

Step Reason
1. ∃x(P(x) ∧ R(x)) Hypothesis
2. P(a) ^ R(a) Existencial instantiation from (1)
3. P(a) Simplification from (2)
4. ∀x(P(x) → (Q(x) ∧ S(x))) Hypothesis
5. P(a) -> (Q(a) ^ S(a)) Universal instantiation from (4)
6. (Q(a) ^ S(a)) Modus ponens from (3) and (5)
7. R(a) Simplification from (2)
8. R(a) ^ Q(a) ^ S(a) Conjunction from (6) and (7)
9. ∃x(R(x) ∧ S(x)) Existential generalization from(8)

Related Solutions

Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound propositions are tautologies. ((?...
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound propositions are tautologies. ((? → ?) ∧ (? → ?)) → (? → ?)
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound propositions are tautologies. ((?...
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound propositions are tautologies. ((? → ?) ∧ (? → ?)) → (? → ?)
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound proposition is a tautologies...
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound proposition is a tautologies (¬? ∧ (? ∨ ?)) → ?
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the followingcompound propositions are logically equivalent....
Use the laws of propositional logic to prove that the following compound propositions are logically equivalent.A. ? ↔ (? ∧ ?) and ? → ?B. ¬(? ∨ (? ∧ (? → ?))) and ¬? ∧ (? → ?)
Two compound propositions p and q in propositional logic are logically equivalent if . . ..
Complete the following statements.Two compound propositions p and q in propositional logic are logically equivalent if . . ..An argument form in propositional logic is valid if . . ..A theorem is a statement that . . ..A statement that is assumed to be true is called a(n) . . ..A proof is a valid argument that . . ..
Consider a formula of propositional logic consisting of a conjunction of clauses of the form (±p⊕±q),...
Consider a formula of propositional logic consisting of a conjunction of clauses of the form (±p⊕±q), where p and q are propositional variables (not necessarily distinct) and ±p stands for either p or ¬p. Consider the graph in which the vertices include p and ¬p for all propositional variables p appearing in the formula, and in which there is an edge (1) connecting p and ¬p for each variable p, and (2) connecting two literals if their exclusive-or is a...
Name and list 6 equations/rules of Propositional Logic...Explain them.
Name and list 6 equations/rules of Propositional Logic...Explain them.
4. Prove that the universal quantifier distributes over conjunction, using constructive logic, (∀x : A, P...
4. Prove that the universal quantifier distributes over conjunction, using constructive logic, (∀x : A, P x ∧ Qx) ⇐⇒ (∀x : A, P x) ∧ (∀x : A, Qx) . 6. We would like to prove the following statement by contraposition, For all natural numbers x and y, if x + y is odd, then x is odd or y is odd. a. Translate the statement into a statement of predicate logic. b. Provide the antecedent required for a...
prove or disprove using logical equivalences (a) p ∧ (q → r) ⇐⇒ (p → q)...
prove or disprove using logical equivalences (a) p ∧ (q → r) ⇐⇒ (p → q) → r (b) x ∧ (¬y ↔ z) ⇐⇒ ((x → y) ∨ ¬z) → (x ∧ ¬(y → z)) (c) (x ∨ y ∨ ¬z) ∧ (¬x ∨ y ∨ z) ⇐⇒ ¬y → (x ↔ z)
Using logical equivalence laws, show that (((p v ~ q) ⊕ p) v ~p) ⊕ (p...
Using logical equivalence laws, show that (((p v ~ q) ⊕ p) v ~p) ⊕ (p v ~q) is equivalent to p v q. v = or, ~ = not, ⊕ = exclusive or (XOR). Please show the steps with the name of the law beside each step, thanks so much!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT