In: Accounting
Lehighton Chalk Company manufactures sidewalk chalk, which it
sells online by the box at $22 per...
Lehighton Chalk Company manufactures sidewalk chalk, which it
sells online by the box at $22 per unit. Lehighton uses an actual
costing system, which means that the actual costs of direct
material, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead are entered into
work-in-process inventory. The actual application rate for
manufacturing overhead is computed each year; actual manufacturing
overhead is divided by actual production (in units) to compute the
application rate. Information for Lehighton’s first two years of
operation is as follows:
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
| Sales (in units) |
|
2,400 |
|
|
2,400 |
|
| Production (in units) |
|
3,000 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
| Production costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Variable manufacturing costs |
$ |
11,100 |
|
$ |
6,660 |
|
| Fixed manufacturing overhead |
|
14,100 |
|
|
14,100 |
|
| Selling and administrative costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Variable |
|
9,600 |
|
|
9,600 |
|
| Fixed |
|
8,600 |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
Selected information from Lehighton’s year-end balance sheets for
its first two years of operation is as follows:
| LEHIGHTON CHALK COMPANY |
| Selected Balance Sheet Information |
| Based on absorption costing |
End of Year 1 |
End of Year 2 |
| Finished-goods inventory |
$ |
5,040 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Retained earnings |
|
8,940 |
|
|
15,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Based on variable costing |
End of Year 1 |
End of Year 2 |
| Finished-goods inventory |
$ |
2,220 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Retained earnings |
|
6,120 |
|
|
15,040 |
|
|
Required:
1. (ALREADY DONE) Reconcile Lehighton’s operating
income reported under absorption and variable costing, during each
year, by comparing the following two amounts on each income
statement:
- Cost of goods sold
- Fixed cost (expensed as a period expense)
|
|
|
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
|
Cost of goods sold under absorption costing |
$20,160 |
$25,800 |
|
Variable manufacturing costs under variable costing |
8,880 |
8,880 |
|
Subtotal |
$11,280 |
$16,920 |
|
Fixed manufacturing overhead as period expense under variable
costing |
14,100 |
14,100 |
|
Total |
$(2,820) |
$2,820 |
|
Operating income under variable costing |
$11,620 |
$11,620 |
|
Less: Operating income under absorption costing |
14,440 |
8,800 |
|
Difference in operating income |
$(2,820) |
$2,820 |
|
2. What was Lehighton’s total operating income
across both years under absorption costing and under variable
costing?
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
| Absorption costing |
|
| Variable costing |
|
|
3. What was the total sales revenue across both
years under absorption costing and under variable costing?
|
|
|
Total Sales Revenue |
| Absorption costing |
|
| Variable costing |
|
|
4. What was the total of all costs expensed on
the operating income statements across both years under absorption
costing and under variable costing?
|
|
|
Costs Expensed |
| Absorption costing |
|
| Variable costing |
|
|
5. Subtract the total costs expensed across
both years (requirement 4) from the total sales revenue across both
years (requirement 3): (a) under absorption costing and (b) under
variable costing.
|
|
|
Amount |
| Absorption costing |
|
| Variable costing |
|
|