Question

In: Accounting

Traffic Management Holdings Ltd (TMHL), a public company, commenced trading in 2001. TMHL has investments in...

Traffic Management Holdings Ltd (TMHL), a public company, commenced trading in 2001. TMHL has investments in a number of partly and wholly owned subsidiaries and a diverse shareholder group including original owners, self-managed superannuation funds, and other sophisticated investors. TMHL Group achieved turnover of $100 million last financial year (FY19 ended 30 June 2019), has gross assets of $62m and employs over 1,000 employees across Australia and New Zealand. Debt within the company is provided by way of debentures issued to the public and also through one of the major four Australian banks. During the course of this financial year, FY20 ending 30 June 2020, the company has pursued a strategic growth strategy undertaking a number of investments. The Directors of TMHL have decided to change audit firms and have approached your audit and advisory firm to undertake the audit and to seek initial advice on how to account for the investments they have made during the FY20 financial year. All shares and units issued by each of the entities are ordinary shares or units with normal voting rights. All key facts as known to the company in relation to the investments made are provided on the following page:

New Zealand TMS Ltd

Traffic Management Holdings Ltd, through its55% owned New Zealand subsidiary, owned 30% of the issued capital at the beginning of thisfinancial year.

•       During the course of this financial year the discussions between the other two shareholders in New Zealand TMS Ltd and TMHL resulted in a deal whereby TMHL directly would, on 31 December acquire a 36% interest (18% from each of the two shareholders) in New Zealand TMS Ltd.

•       The remaining 34% of the shares are to be retained by the two founding shareholders who each own 17% of the issued capital. They are employees of the company and have a keen interest in the running of the company and attend all meetings.

•       The board of directors of New Zealand TMS Ltd has five members. Under the new arrangements three directors on the board of New Zealand TMS Ltd will be appointed by Traffic Management Holdings Ltd. The other two seats are to be held by the founding shareholders of New Zealand TMS Ltd.

TMS Victoria Pty Ltd

The company was formed during thefinancial year in response to winning a joint tender for all Victorian State and LocalGovernment road work traffic managementservices.

•       Traffic Management Holdings Ltd owns 20% of the issued capital.

•       Australian Road Constructions Ltd owns 20% of the issued capital.

•       Two institutional infrastructure investors equally hold 50% of the issued capital. These shareholders regularly attend meetings and vote.

•       The remaining 10% of the issued capitalis owned by a small number of materials supply companies each holding a small parcel of shares. These shareholders are unlikely to attend shareholder meetings.

TM Products

Traffic Management Holdings Ltd contributed50% to a new venture to produce traffic management products including safety vests, traffic management signage and cones.

•       Australian TM Products Pty Ltd contributed the manufacturing facility and existing relationships and staffing representing the other 50% of the value of the new venture.

•       Traffic Management Holdings Ltd and Australian TM Products Pty Ltd will share the manufactured products produced by the new venture and sell them to their own customers. Each of the parties will own a 50% interest in all the venture's individual assets and obligation for the venture's liabilities.

•       The new venture contractual agreement signed by both parties stipulates neither Traffic Management Holdings Ltd nor Australian TM Products Pty Ltd can make any operating, investing or financing decisions without the expressed consent of the other party.

Traffic Control Training Services Unit Trust

•       Traffic Management Holdings Ltd, through a wholly owned subsidiary, owns 40% of the issued units.

•       The remaining units are owned by two large education training institutions, one operating out of Queensland and the other in New South Wales and Victoria. Each of the training institutions are involved in presenting traffic control training services to TMHL employees and other companies and own 30% of the issued units.

•       All investors have rights to the net assets of Traffic Control Training Services Unit Trust.

•       The current board of directors of the corporate trustee, Traffic Control Training Services Pty Ltd, the Trustee for the Traffic Control Training Services Unit Trust, has five members. One director on the board is appointed by Traffic Management Holdings Ltd. The other directors are appointed by the two

institutional investors.

Given the information above, the directors of Traffic Management Holdings Ltd would particularly like to know:

Does AASB 3 Business Combinations, AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and/or AASB 128 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures apply to the Traffic Management Holdings Ltd Group in the FY20 financial year

  • Justify conclusions with suitable referencing to relevant Australian Accounting Standards if applicable

Solutions

Expert Solution

All the 3 standards are applicable to Traffic Management Holdings Ltd Group in the FY20 financial year.

AAB 3 states a business combination involving entities or businesses under common control is a business combination in which all of the combining entities or businesses are ultimately controlled by the same party or parties both before and after the business combination. (New Zealand TMS Ltd)

AASB 128 states that If an entity holds, directly or indirectly (eg through subsidiaries), 20 per cent or more of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that the entity has significant influence. (TMS Victoria Pty Ltd)

AASB 10 states that a number of different ways in which an entity can have power over another entity. In the most straightforward cases control arises by owning over 50% of the voting rights (TM Products)

These are the reasons due to which all the three standards are applicable to Traffic Management Holdings Ltd Group


Related Solutions

During 2020, Financial Holdings, a public company, purchased equity securities for trading purposes. At December 31,...
During 2020, Financial Holdings, a public company, purchased equity securities for trading purposes. At December 31, 2020, the securities for Financial Holdings were as follows: Security Quantity Cost Market Value Sabo common shares 1,000 $20,000 $18,500 PYK $1.50 preferred shares 2,000 34,000 34,500 Total $54,000 $53,000 The following transactions with respect to Financial Holdings’ investments occurred during 2021: Jan. 15 Purchased 1,500 common shares of Hazmi for $20.00 per share. The shares are designated as fair value through other comprehensive...
You have recently been appointed management accountant for Rugby Coffee Mugs Pty Ltd. The company commenced...
You have recently been appointed management accountant for Rugby Coffee Mugs Pty Ltd. The company commenced its operations on 1 July 2019 manufacturing one size coffee mugs with individual club names and club logos of rugby union clubs playing in the New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia local rugby union competition. The company currently does not have any management accounting controls and part of your appointment involves improving the company’s manufacturing internal control systems to facilitate the projection,...
Calculate the company cost of capital (or WACC) of Kangas Ltd, a company that commenced operations...
Calculate the company cost of capital (or WACC) of Kangas Ltd, a company that commenced operations many years ago. Relevant details relating to the company include the following. Extract from statement of financial performance Liabilities Debentures ($100 par, 12.5% coupon—annual) $4,000,000 Preference shares ($3 par, 7% cumulative) 1,500,000 Owners’ equityOrdinary shares ($0.50 par) $7,500,000 Retained earnings 2,500,000 Additional information •An interest payment in relation to the debentures has just been made, and they mature three years from today. The market...
Amber Ltd is a public company. It is not listed on the ASX and it has...
Amber Ltd is a public company. It is not listed on the ASX and it has no constitution. Su is a large shareholder of the company who is upset with the way in which Amber Ltd is being run. She does not consider the directors have made a sensible decision in deciding to borrow funds from Loans Ltd. As a condition of lending, an officer of Loans Ltd will be appointed as director of Amber Ltd. Su wants the company...
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $42per share....
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $42per share. With 850k shares outstanding, EPS were $1.41. The entrepreneur and the members of the board of directors were initially pleased when another firm purchased 50k shares of ABC stock. However, when the purchasing firm bought another 50k shares, the entrepreneur and members of the board became concerned that the purchasing firm might be trying to take over ABC. The entrepreneur was reminded by the...
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $43per share....
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $43per share. With 850k shares outstanding, EPS were $1.41. The entrepreneur and the members of the board of directors were initially pleased when another firm purchased 50k shares of ABC stock. However, when the purchasing firm bought another 50k shares, the entrepreneur and members of the board became concerned that the purchasing firm might be trying to take over ABC. The entrepreneur was reminded by the...
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $45per share....
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $45per share. With 850k shares outstanding, EPS were $1.41. The entrepreneur and the members of the board of directors were initially pleased when another firm purchased 50k shares of ABC stock. However, when the purchasing firm bought another 50k shares, the entrepreneur and members of the board became concerned that the purchasing firm might be trying to take over ABC. The entrepreneur was reminded by the...
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $41per share....
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $41per share. With 850k shares outstanding, EPS were $1.41. The entrepreneur and the members of the board of directors were initially pleased when another firm purchased 50k shares of ABC stock. However, when the purchasing firm bought another 50k shares, the entrepreneur and members of the board became concerned that the purchasing firm might be trying to take over ABC. The entrepreneur was reminded by the...
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $41per share....
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $41per share. With 850k shares outstanding, EPS were $1.41. The entrepreneur and the members of the board of directors were initially pleased when another firm purchased 50k shares of ABC stock. However, when the purchasing firm bought another 50k shares, the entrepreneur and members of the board became concerned that the purchasing firm might be trying to take over ABC. The entrepreneur was reminded by the...
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $42per share....
An entrepreneur founded a company (ABC) in 2001. Recently, the stock was trading at $42per share. With 850k shares outstanding, EPS were $1.41. The entrepreneur and the members of the board of directors were initially pleased when another firm purchased 50k shares of ABC stock. However, when the purchasing firm bought another 50k shares, the entrepreneur and members of the board became concerned that the purchasing firm might be trying to take over ABC. The entrepreneur was reminded by the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT