Question

In: Economics

Assume that an uncle of yours was injured on 1/1/17 in an automobile accident. The accident...

Assume that an uncle of yours was injured on 1/1/17 in an automobile accident. The accident was serious, and it was the other driver's fault. As the result of the accident, your uncle is not able to return to his medical practice where he earned $280,000 during calendar year 2016. Your uncle's accident occurred on his 60th birthday (some birthday) and he planned (prior to the accident) to work another eight years (until the end of 2024).

Your uncle has sustained a large economic loss because he can no longer count on his substantial earnings from his medical practice. To recover his economic loss, your uncle filed suit against the other driver and the driver's insurance company in Wisconsin Civil Court. The case comes to trial at the end of this month, but your uncle has just received a settlement offer from the insurance company of $2,300,000 to compensate him for his loss of past (2017) and future (2018-2024) earning capacity. Your uncle seeks your advice in evaluating the settlement offer. In particular, he asks you whether $2,300,000 meets the standard required in Wisconsin Civil Courts "that all future economic damages be expressed in present value terms". [You should know also that the convention in such legal proceedings is to use the U.S. Treasury bond rate as the discount rate.]

To give your uncle the advice he seeks you must calculate the present value of his expected earnings for the years 2017-2024. In making this calculation, assume the following: a) Your uncle (absent the accident) would have continued to work full time in his medical practice from the date of the accident (1/1/17 until his projected retirement on 12/31/2024; b) Your uncle earned $280,000 in 2016 and expected to have his earnings increase in 2017 and each future year by 3% per year; c) Use 2.0% as the annual discount rate to discount projected future earnings to present value.

1. Explain and show your calculations (using the template at the end of this assignment) of how you would set up the present value calculation in your uncle's case. What is the present value of his lost expected earnings if we use 2.0% as the discount rate? [Hint: Remember that we are assuming that his earnings will increase by 3.0% each year over the entire eight-year period. Thus your first task is to calculate his projected earnings in each year (2017-2024). Once you have his projected earnings calculated, you then proceed to the discounting calculation. The template at the bottom of this assignment should help you.]

2. Does the $2,300,000 settlement offer equal or exceed the full present value of the loss of earnings sustained by your uncle? Ignoring the cost of the trial (and the chance that the jury might not find in his favor), should he accept this settlement? Explain

3. Would your answer in #2 change if you were to use 4.0 percent as the discount rate? Be specific.

[Hints: To ease the computational busy work in this problem, please be advised of the following:

The present value of $1 discounted at 2.0% (and received at the end of each of the following years) is:

2017            $1.00

2018              $.9804

2019              $.9612

2020              $.9423

2021              $.9238

2022              $.9057

2023              $.8880

2024              $.8706

Likewise, the present value of $1 discounted at 4% (and received at the end of each of the following years) is:

2017              $1.00

2018              $.9615

2019              $.9246

2020              $.8890

2021              $.8548

2022              $.8219

2023              $.7903

2024    $.7599

[Note in both cases that income that would have been received in 2017 is not reduced in the present value calculation. Put differently, assume that January 1, 2018 is the beginning of the future period.]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Perhaps the following will help you sort this out:

The information provided in your assignment for this week (see below) just performs these individual calculations for you (on the assumption of $1 received at the end of each future year).

Thus (using the 2.0% case), if you want to calculate the present value of $300,000 received in 2019, the PV = $300,000*.9612 = $288,360.

The same calculation, but using a 4.0% discount rate is: $300,000*.9246 = $277,380.

This example illustrates a very important result: other things being equal, the present value of any fixed sum of money to be received at a future date will vary inversely with the discount rate. The higher the discount rate, the lower the present value. This explains why the stock market generally declines when interest rates rise and why housing prices decline when mortgage interest rates rise, etc.

Let me know if you are still having trouble with any of this.

RM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The following template should help set this problem up:

Year

Actual/

Present

Present

Present

Present

Projected

Value of

Value of

Value of

Value of

Earnings

$1 at 2.0%

Projected

$1 at 4.0%

Projected

(3% inflation)

Earnings

Earnings

at 2.0%

at 4.0%

2016

$        280,000

2017

$        288,400

1.0000

$     288,400

1.0000

$    288,400

2018

0.9804

0.9615

2019

0.9612

0.9246

2020

0.9423

0.8890

2021

0.9238

0.8548

2022

0.9057

0.8219

2023

0.8880

0.7903

2024

0.8706

0.7599

Total

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Part 4: 1. A woman has been injured in an automobile accident and as a result...
Part 4: 1. A woman has been injured in an automobile accident and as a result is permanently disabled for life. (The accident was not her fault.) She is 35 years of age and had planned on working until age 70. As a potential college professor, she was about to start a job that paid $50,000 annually. Using 6%, what is the amount of lost income in present-day dollars? 2. Additionally, she faces annual medical bills of $30,000, all of...
Automobile Insurance Briefly describe how the tort liability system compensates injured auto accident victims? Describe three...
Automobile Insurance Briefly describe how the tort liability system compensates injured auto accident victims? Describe three circumstances under which a motorist is required to provide proof of financial responsibility to comply with financial responsibility laws. Describe the disadvantage of financial responsibility laws. Briefly describe how no-fault automobile insurance operates. Explain why no-fault auto insurance laws were developed.
Suppose every driver faces a 1% probability of an automobile accident every year. An accident will,...
Suppose every driver faces a 1% probability of an automobile accident every year. An accident will, on an average cost each driver $10,000. Suppose there are two types of individuals: those with $60,000 and those with $5,000 in the bank. Assume that individuals with $5,000 in the bank declare bankruptcy if they get in an accident. In the bankruptcy, creditors receive only what individuals have in the bank. What price are individuals with $5,000 in the bank willing to pay...
Mickey Mouse was injured in a work accident on a roller coaster and as a result...
Mickey Mouse was injured in a work accident on a roller coaster and as a result is entitled to some compensation. The insurance company has offered him the choice of an annual payment each year for the next 20 years, with the first payment being made today, or a lump sum payment now of $1.5 million. If a fair return is 3.5% p.a., how large must the annual payment be to leave him as well off financially as with the...
Paul was injured in an accident. In addition to considerable discomfort, the best estimate is that...
Paul was injured in an accident. In addition to considerable discomfort, the best estimate is that his medical expense in 2009 will be $100,000. In the future, those expenses will increase at 10% per year. Paul had been earning $50,000 per year, but will only earn 80% of that in the future. Labor economists expect those in Paul's occupation to experience a 3% annual increase in earnings. Assume Paul has a 10-year work life and a 20-year expected natural life...
Sally is injured in a work accident and the court is trying to determine the discounted...
Sally is injured in a work accident and the court is trying to determine the discounted value of her future income. At the time of the accident, she was earning $50,000 a year and planned to retire in 31 years. She anticipated getting a 3% raise for the first 8 years and a 6.5% raise each year after. Assuming the payments are at the end of the year and the first is $50,000, determine the discounted value of her future...
This year Zach was injured in an auto accident. As a result, he received the following...
This year Zach was injured in an auto accident. As a result, he received the following payments. Zach received $18,000 of disability pay. Zach has disability insurance provided by his employer as a nontaxable fringe benefit. Zach's employer paid $4,300 in disability premiums for Zach this year. Zach's hospital bills totaled $4,500 and were paid by his health insurance. Zach has health insurance provided by his employer as a nontaxable fringe benefit. Zach's employer paid $6,250 in health insurance premiums...
Sam was injured in an accident and the insurance company has offered him the choice of...
Sam was injured in an accident and the insurance company has offered him the choice of 25,000 per year for 15 years with the first payment being made today or lump sum if a fair return is 7.5% how large must a lump-sum be to have him as well off financially as with the annuity
Use the following information for questions 17 and 18: -Assume that the Louisville market for (automobile)...
Use the following information for questions 17 and 18: -Assume that the Louisville market for (automobile) tires is made up of many buyers and sellers. Answer the questions with respect to how these various events affect this market 17. Which of the following would best explain a decrease in equilibrium price of tires and an increase in equilibrium quantity of tires: A. increase in supply B. decrease in supply C. decrease in demand D. increase in both demand and supply...
John Aitorea was seriously injured in an industrial accident. He sued the responsible parties and was...
John Aitorea was seriously injured in an industrial accident. He sued the responsible parties and was awarded a judgement of $2 million dollars. Today, he and his attorney are attending a settlement conference with the defendants. The defendants have made an initial offer of $156,000 per year for 25 years. John plans to counteroffer at $255,000 per year for 25 years. Both the offer and the counteroffer have a present value of $2 million, the amount of the judgement. Both...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT