For the Deontologists, moral principles apply to only people who have accepted a moral duty people...

For the Deontologists, moral principles apply to

only people who have accepted a moral duty

people in certain cultures

everyone regardless of their personal feelings

situations where utilitarianism doesn't work

Expert Solution

Utilitarianism says that we should always do what will have the best consequences for all those affected by our actions. "Best consequences" generally refers to well-being, in some sense, although utilitarians differ on whether this means happiness, and the reduction of suffering, or something like the satisfaction of preferences.

Utilitarians don't just focus on their friends or family, or their fellow-citizens. They are concerned about distant strangers. They are concerned about future generations (so utilitarianism tells us why climate change matters, for example, even if its most severe effects won't be felt for another century). And "all affected" includes all sentient beings, so the suffering of animals matters too.

That's a clear and straightforward ethical position. Virtually everyone agrees that it's better for sentient beings to be happier and have less suffering. That's not enough to make everyone a utilitarian, because some people think that in addition, there are absolute moral rules one must never break. Most moral rules are useful guides to what will bring about the best consequences. But if they are not — if we really know, with certainty, that obeying a moral rule will have worse consequences than breaking it — should we still obey it? Why? That's the challenge utilitarianism poses to other views.

Utilitarianism changes people's lives in many ways. For example it leads many people to support , a growing movement of people who want to be as effective as possible in making the world a better place. They want to do (advert warning, this is the title of my forthcoming book) The Most Good You Can Do. That doesn't mean that all EAs are utilitarians, but utilitarians are, or ought to be, EAs.

Nightingale answered 2 years ago

moral relativism is the view that people have different moral views there are no moral truths...

moral relativism is the view that people have different moral views there are no moral truths what is right is relative to different people or groups according to what they considerright one problem for cultural relativism is that the view makes it conceptually impossible for a culture to change for the better nobody can know what is really morally true no single culture’s moral opinions are privileged as objectively correct normative Ethics is concerned with how we ought to act,...

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are created by: (Select all that apply) Select one or more:...

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are created by: (Select all that apply) Select one or more: A. The Securities and Exchange Commission B. The Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Task Force C. The Sarbanes Oxley Act D. The Financial Accounting Standards Board E. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Which of the following is included as a component of stockholders' equity? Select one: A. Accounts payable B. Buildings C. Dividends D. Prepaid property taxes E. Retained earnings As inventory and property...

Please answer the following questions: Do you believe that companies have a moral duty to be...

Please answer the following questions: Do you believe that companies have a moral duty to be socially responsible? If doing so comes at a cost to the company, is that really a best business practice? Where do you stand on the subject of social responsibility vs. company profit?

What parts of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, are not generally accepted?

hypersensitivity reactions to an allergen to an only occur in people who have been sensitised to...

hypersensitivity reactions to an allergen to an only occur in people who have been sensitised to that allergen. This sensitisation involves

Are corporations moral agents? Do they have moral responsibilities? Or in your view, do only human...

Are corporations moral agents? Do they have moral responsibilities? Or in your view, do only human beings have moral agency and moral obligations?

"True leaders can only come from people who have understood the importance of diversity and have...

"True leaders can only come from people who have understood the importance of diversity and have engaged in different experiences. So chances are the leaders we have seen in war-torn or disaster-struck areas have had a wide amount of exposure to different people and cultures through volunteer work. A research by a leading social support agency postulates that altruistic leadership increases through travel and volunteer work unless there is very thorough training on how to work on such situations." If...

Describe the no-duty or no-duty-to-treat principles from an ethical and human rights perspective. Provide a specific...

Describe the no-duty or no-duty-to-treat principles from an ethical and human rights perspective. Provide a specific example of this principle in practice.

Justification defenses claim a kind of moral high ground. They may be offered by people who...

Justification defenses claim a kind of moral high ground. They may be offered by people who find themselves forced to choose between "two evils." Explain and discuss three justification defenses. Do you think that such defenses are appropriate?

This week we have learned about four of the generally accepted accounting principles – revenue recognition,...

This week we have learned about four of the generally accepted accounting principles – revenue recognition, expense recognition, the matching principle, and the historical cost principle. Briefly explain what is meant by each of these and how they are applied to accrual accounting.

Question