Question

In: Economics

Suppose the government passes a law making it more difficult for firms to fire workers. One...

Suppose the government passes a law making it more difficult for firms to fire workers. One example might be a law requiring severance pay for fired workers. The goal of this law is to reduce the rate of job separation without affecting the rate of job finding. Use this information to answer the following three questions. (Assume the size of the labor force remains constant.)

1. the natural rate of unemployment will (fall/rise).

2. The rate of job separation will decrease, and the average spell of (unemployment/employment) will rise

3. For any given decrease in s, making it more costly for firms to fire an employee may also (multiple choice)

a. cause unemployed workers to select a new job more quickly. This would increase f and, if the increase in f is large enough, decrease U/L.

b. make it more costly for firms to hire an employee. This would decrease f and, if the reduction in f is large enough, increase U/L.

c. decrease the spell that employees work for the same employer. This would increase f and, if the increase in f is large enough, decrease U/L.

d. cause firms to expect more employee effort for the same pay. This would decrease f and, if the reduction in f is large enough, increase U/L.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer 1:

Fall. This will reduce frictional unemployment in the economy because employees will be less likely to look for new jobs when their employer does not remove them easily and since naturate rate of unemployment = frictional rate of unemployment + Structural rate of unemployment, a decrease in frictional rate of unemployment in the economy will reduce the natural rate of unemployment in the economy.

Answer 2:

Employment. The policy making it difficult for the firms to fire workers, will decrease the rate of job separation and this will increase the average spell of employment in the economy.

Answer 3: Option b.make it more costly for firms to hire an employee. This would decrease f and, if the reduction in f is large enough, increase U/L.

As it becomes difficult for the firms to fire workers, this will make it more costly for the firm to hire a worker.This decreases f and this can lead to increase in the level of unemployment rate in the labor market.

Option a is incorrect because it will make it difficult for unemployed worker to search for job.Option c is incorrect because it would increase the spell that an employee work for the same employer because firing becomes costly.Option d is incorrect because it would not increase unemployment rate.


Related Solutions

Critically evaluate the following sentence: "Legislation that made it more difficult for firms to fire workers...
Critically evaluate the following sentence: "Legislation that made it more difficult for firms to fire workers would decrease the unemployment rate."
Suppose the government passes a law which says that milk cannot be sold for less than...
Suppose the government passes a law which says that milk cannot be sold for less than $5 per gallon. What do we call this type of policy? Draw two diagrams, one which shows the market for milk with this policy and one that shows the market without the policy. Who is hurt by this policy? Who benefits from this policy? Explain. Is this policy efficient? Explain
Suppose the government makes it more difficult to qualify for unemployment insurance, for example, by increasing...
Suppose the government makes it more difficult to qualify for unemployment insurance, for example, by increasing the duration of employment required before collecting UI benefits during an unemployment spell. Determine the effects of this change in government policy on the reservation wage and the long-run unemployment rate in the one-sided search model of unemployment.
Why is bank lending to large corporations more difficult than making loans to small firms? What...
Why is bank lending to large corporations more difficult than making loans to small firms? What additional factors are involved in this process? Do banks have some additional tools to help in assessing credit risk of large firms? What are some examples
Suppose that a government passed a new law that requires firms to comply with strict regulations....
Suppose that a government passed a new law that requires firms to comply with strict regulations. This law discourages investment in the country. At the same time, government surplus increases sustainability because of effective policies. In a single well labeled graph , show the consequences of above information on the market for loanable funds. Be sure to specify changes in the equilibrium interest rate and equilibrium quantity of loanable funds.
Compared to a profit-making company, is it more difficult or less difficult for a government entity to develop a strategic plan or mission statement? Explain your answer?
Compared to a profit-making company, is it more difficult or less difficult for a government entity to develop a strategic plan or mission statement? Explain your answer?
Suppose that government spending makes private firms more productive; for example, government spending on roads and...
Suppose that government spending makes private firms more productive; for example, government spending on roads and bridges lowers the cost of transportation. This means that there are now two effects of government spending, the first being the effects discussed in this chapter of an increase in G and the second being similar to the effects of an increase in the nation’s capital stock K. (a) Show that an increase in government spending that is productive in this fashion could increase...
Many firms have devised defenses that make it more difficult or costly for other firms to...
Many firms have devised defenses that make it more difficult or costly for other firms to take them over. How might such defenses affect the firm’s agency problems? Are managers of firms with formidable takeover defenses more or less likely to act in the shareholders’ interests rather than their own? What would you expect to happen to the share price when management proposes to institute such defenses?
In the course of producing its output, a firm causes pollution. The government passes a law...
In the course of producing its output, a firm causes pollution. The government passes a law that requires the firm to stop polluting, and the firm dis-covers that it can prevent the pollution by hiring x workers for every worker that is producing output. That is, if the firm hires N workers, then xN workers are required to clean up the pollution caused by the N workers who are actually producing output. Deter-mine the effects of the pollution regulation on...
In the course of producing its output, a firm causes pollution. The government passes a law...
In the course of producing its output, a firm causes pollution. The government passes a law that requires the firm to stop polluting, and the firm discovers that it can prevent the pollution by hiring x workers for every worker that is producing output. That is, if the firm hires N workers, then xN workers are required to clean up the pollution caused by the N workers who are actually producing output. Determine the effects of the pollution regulation on...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT