Question

In: Accounting

Create a 5-step modelling process based on the work of Lankhorst et al (see reference reading,...

Create a 5-step modelling process based on the work of Lankhorst et al (see reference reading, chapter 5) that can be used to create an enterprise model. Pay specific attention the aspects of the purpose of modelling and at least 5 steps to follow to create the model. (20)

Solutions

Expert Solution

A coherent description of enterprise architecture provides insight, enables communication among
stakeholders and guides complicated change processes. Unfortunately, so far no enterprise architecture
description language exists that fully enables integrated enterprise modelling, because for each architectural domain, architects use their own modelling techniques and concepts, tool support, visualisation
techniques, etc. In this paper we outline such an integrated language and we identify and study concepts that relate architectural domains. In our language concepts for describing the relationships between architecture descriptions at the business, application, and technology levels play a central role,
related to the ubiquitous problem of business–ICT alignment, whereas for each architectural domain
we conform to existing languages or standards such as UML. In particular, usage of services offered by
one layer to another plays an important role in relating the behaviour aspects of the layers. The structural aspects of the layers are linked through the interface concept, and the information aspects through
realisation relations.
1. Introduction
In current business practice, an integrated approach to business and IT is indispensable. However, in
many companies such an integrated view of the entire enterprise is still far off. This is an important
problem, because changes in a company’s strategy and business goals have significant consequences
within all domains of the enterprise, such as the organisation structure, business processes, software
systems, data management and technical infrastructure. Companies have to adjust processes to their
environment, open up internal systems and make them transparent to both internal and external parties.
Take for example a company that needs to assess the impact of introducing a new product in its
portfolio. This may require defining additional business processes, hiring extra personnel, changing the
supporting applications, and augmenting the technological infrastructure to support the additional load
of these applications. Perhaps this may even require a change of the organisational structure. Many
stakeholders within and outside the company can be identified, ranging from top-level management to
software engineers. Each stakeholder requires specific information presented in an accessible way, to
deal with the impact of such wide-ranging developments. It is very difficult to obtain an overview of
these changes and their impact on each other, and to provide both decision makers and engineers implementing the changes with the information they need.
1.1 Alignment
Business alignment is commonly recognised as an important instrument to realise organisational effectiveness. Organisational effectiveness is not obtained by local optimisations, but is realised by wellorchestrated interaction of organisational components (Nadler 1992). Effectiveness is driven by the
relationships between components rather than by the detailed specification of each individual component.
A vast amount of literature has been written on the topic of business alignment, each underlining the
significance of both “soft” and “hard” components of an organisation. Nadler (1992) identifies four
relevant alignment components: work, people, the formal organisation and the informal organisation.
Labovitz and Rosansky (Labovitz and Rosanksy 1997) emphasise the horizontal and vertical alignment A coherent description of enterprise architecture provides insight, enables communication among
stakeholders and guides complicated change processes. Unfortunately, so far no enterprise architecture
description language exists that fully enables integrated enterprise modelling, because for each architectural domain, architects use their own modelling techniques and concepts, tool support, visualisation
techniques, etc. In this paper we outline such an integrated language and we identify and study concepts that relate architectural domains. In our language concepts for describing the relationships between architecture descriptions at the business, application, and technology levels play a central role,
related to the ubiquitous problem of business–ICT alignment, whereas for each architectural domain
we conform to existing languages or standards such as UML. In particular, usage of services offered by
one layer to another plays an important role in relating the behaviour aspects of the layers. The structural aspects of the layers are linked through the interface concept, and the information aspects through
realisation relations.
1. Introduction
In current business practice, an integrated approach to business and IT is indispensable. However, in
many companies such an integrated view of the entire enterprise is still far off. This is an important
problem, because changes in a company’s strategy and business goals have significant consequences
within all domains of the enterprise, such as the organisation structure, business processes, software
systems, data management and technical infrastructure. Companies have to adjust processes to their
environment, open up internal systems and make them transparent to both internal and external parties.
Take for example a company that needs to assess the impact of introducing a new product in its
portfolio. This may require defining additional business processes, hiring extra personnel, changing the
supporting applications, and augmenting the technological infrastructure to support the additional load
of these applications. Perhaps this may even require a change of the organisational structure. Many
stakeholders within and outside the company can be identified, ranging from top-level management to
software engineers. Each stakeholder requires specific information presented in an accessible way, to
deal with the impact of such wide-ranging developments. It is very difficult to obtain an overview of
these changes and their impact on each other, and to provide both decision makers and engineers implementing the changes with the information they need.
1.1 Alignment
Business alignment is commonly recognised as an important instrument to realise organisational effectiveness. Organisational effectiveness is not obtained by local optimisations, but is realised by wellorchestrated interaction of organisational components (Nadler 1992). Effectiveness is driven by the
relationships between components rather than by the detailed specification of each individual component.
A vast amount of literature has been written on the topic of business alignment, each underlining the
significance of both “soft” and “hard” components of an organisation. Nadler (1992) identifies four
relevant alignment components: work, people, the formal organisation and the informal organisation.
Labovitz and Rosansky (Labovitz and Rosanksy 1997) emphasise the horizontal and vertical alignment A coherent description of enterprise architecture provides insight, enables communication among
stakeholders and guides complicated change processes. Unfortunately, so far no enterprise architecture
description language exists that fully enables integrated enterprise modelling, because for each architectural domain, architects use their own modelling techniques and concepts, tool support, visualisation
techniques, etc. In this paper we outline such an integrated language and we identify and study concepts that relate architectural domains. In our language concepts for describing the relationships between architecture descriptions at the business, application, and technology levels play a central role,
related to the ubiquitous problem of business–ICT alignment, whereas for each architectural domain
we conform to existing languages or standards such as UML. In particular, usage of services offered by
one layer to another plays an important role in relating the behaviour aspects of the layers. The structural aspects of the layers are linked through the interface concept, and the information aspects through
realisation relations.
1. Introduction
In current business practice, an integrated approach to business and IT is indispensable. However, in
many companies such an integrated view of the entire enterprise is still far off. This is an important
problem, because changes in a company’s strategy and business goals have significant consequences
within all domains of the enterprise, such as the organisation structure, business processes, software
systems, data management and technical infrastructure. Companies have to adjust processes to their
environment, open up internal systems and make them transparent to both internal and external parties.
Take for example a company that needs to assess the impact of introducing a new product in its
portfolio. This may require defining additional business processes, hiring extra personnel, changing the
supporting applications, and augmenting the technological infrastructure to support the additional load
of these applications. Perhaps this may even require a change of the organisational structure. Many
stakeholders within and outside the company can be identified, ranging from top-level management to
software engineers. Each stakeholder requires specific information presented in an accessible way, to
deal with the impact of such wide-ranging developments. It is very difficult to obtain an overview of
these changes and their impact on each other, and to provide both decision makers and engineers implementing the changes with the information they need.
1.1 Alignment
Business alignment is commonly recognised as an important instrument to realise organisational effectiveness. Organisational effectiveness is not obtained by local optimisations, but is realised by wellorchestrated interaction of organisational components (Nadler 1992). Effectiveness is driven by the
relationships between components rather than by the detailed specification of each individual component.
A vast amount of literature has been written on the topic of business alignment, each underlining the
significance of both “soft” and “hard” components of an organisation. Nadler (1992) identifies four
relevant alignment components: work, people, the formal organisation and the informal organisation.
Labovitz and Rosansky (Labovitz and Rosanksy 1997) emphasise the horizontal and vertical alignment A coherent description of enterprise architecture provides insight, enables communication among
stakeholders and guides complicated change processes. Unfortunately, so far no enterprise architecture
description language exists that fully enables integrated enterprise modelling, because for each architectural domain, architects use their own modelling techniques and concepts, tool support, visualisation
techniques, etc. In this paper we outline such an integrated language and we identify and study concepts that relate architectural domains. In our language concepts for describing the relationships between architecture descriptions at the business, application, and technology levels play a central role,
related to the ubiquitous problem of business–ICT alignment, whereas for each architectural domain
we conform to existing languages or standards such as UML. In particular, usage of services offered by
one layer to another plays an important role in relating the behaviour aspects of the layers. The structural aspects of the layers are linked through the interface concept, and the information aspects through
realisation relations.
1. Introduction
In current business practice, an integrated approach to business and IT is indispensable. However, in
many companies such an integrated view of the entire enterprise is still far off. This is an important
problem, because changes in a company’s strategy and business goals have significant consequences
within all domains of the enterprise, such as the organisation structure, business processes, software
systems, data management and technical infrastructure. Companies have to adjust processes to their
environment, open up internal systems and make them transparent to both internal and external parties.
Take for example a company that needs to assess the impact of introducing a new product in its
portfolio. This may require defining additional business processes, hiring extra personnel, changing the
supporting applications, and augmenting the technological infrastructure to support the additional load
of these applications. Perhaps this may even require a change of the organisational structure. Many
stakeholders within and outside the company can be identified, ranging from top-level management to
software engineers. Each stakeholder requires specific information presented in an accessible way, to
deal with the impact of such wide-ranging developments. It is very difficult to obtain an overview of
these changes and their impact on each other, and to provide both decision makers and engineers implementing the changes with the information they need.
1.1 Alignment
Business alignment is commonly recognised as an important instrument to realise organisational effectiveness. Organisational effectiveness is not obtained by local optimisations, but is realised by wellorchestrated interaction of organisational components (Nadler 1992). Effectiveness is driven by the
relationships between components rather than by the detailed specification of each individual component.
A vast amount of literature has been written on the topic of business alignment, each underlining the
significance of both “soft” and “hard” components of an organisation. Nadler (1992) identifies four
relevant alignment components: work, people, the formal organisation and the informal organisation.
Labovitz and Rosansky (Labovitz and Rosanksy 1997) emphasise the horizontal and vertical alignment


Related Solutions

Create a 5-step modelling process based on the work of Lankhorst et al
Create a 5-step modelling process based on the work of Lankhorst et al
This question is based on the Anello et al. reading and will be graded later. Briefly...
This question is based on the Anello et al. reading and will be graded later. Briefly explain one projected benefit of applying Evolutionary Medicine to disease, or teaching about Evolutionary Medicine in Life Science courses.
‘People are an asset not a cost’ (Beer et al, 1984). Discuss this with reference to...
‘People are an asset not a cost’ (Beer et al, 1984). Discuss this with reference to the resource based theories of strategy and HRM. HR managers can ‘help make capitalism human’ (Holbeche, 2007). Evaluate the arguments for and against this assertion. ’HR should not be defined by what it does but by what it delivers’ (Ulrich, 1998). Discuss. Globalisation represents the biggest challenge facing HR professionals in the 21st Century. Discuss, giving your rationale and evidence.
Summarize the Kim et al. reading on the Value Chain concept. Be sure to include the...
Summarize the Kim et al. reading on the Value Chain concept. Be sure to include the key aspects of each article with a final paragraph of what you learned and how you can apply it in the workplace or your personal life
Land and Sea. Our Grosberg et al. (2012) reading on biodiversity on land and in the...
Land and Sea. Our Grosberg et al. (2012) reading on biodiversity on land and in the sea suggested that “The evolutionary fates of clades making transitions among the great realm depends on the inherent adaptability of their physiological and developmental systems, as well as on the ability of incumbents to exclude competitors that are initially poorly adapted to the new medium.”  (A) How does this statement explain the success of plants in terrestrial environments, and the fact that all land...
Based on Lanzenauer et al. (1987). To process income tax forms, the IRS first sends each...
Based on Lanzenauer et al. (1987). To process income tax forms, the IRS first sends each form through the data preparation (DP) department, where information is coded for computer entry. Then the form is sent to data entry (DE), where it is entered into the computer. During the next 3 weeks, the following quantities of forms will arrive: week 1, 40,000; week 2, 30,000; and week 3, 60,000. All employees work 40 hours per week and are paid $500 per...
Based on the material in your text and the Bakker et al. article in this learning...
Based on the material in your text and the Bakker et al. article in this learning unit, it is clear that just in America, our views about toilet training have changed over time. Based on all of this information, in addition to your personal experience and messages you have received from family and friends about toilet training, what do you think is the best way to approach toilet training, and at what age?
Create an implementation plan (work breakdown structure) that walks through the process step-by-step and provides a...
Create an implementation plan (work breakdown structure) that walks through the process step-by-step and provides a schedule for each milestone. Explain your strategies for implementing the change within the organization, such as training or process change. Explain your strategies for monitoring the project. Explain any risks or challenges that you anticipate, and how you plan to overcome those risks. THIS IS FOR THE MAYO CLINIC ANY HELP IS NEEDED!
Questions for an Ecology assignment. These questions are based on the article: Barbosa, Pedro, et al....
Questions for an Ecology assignment. These questions are based on the article: Barbosa, Pedro, et al. "Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors." Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics 40 (2009): 1-20. 1. Describe an example the authors provided for a way that competition with a neighboring plant can alter its susceptibility to herbivores. Can you think of another instance in which competition between focal plants and neighbor plants might lead to either associational resistance (AR)...
Data Modelling is the primary step in the process of database design. Compare and contrast Conceptual...
Data Modelling is the primary step in the process of database design. Compare and contrast Conceptual data model versus Physical data model. Illustrates with help of example to list down data (entities), relationship among data and constraints on data.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT