Question

In: Accounting

On January 1, 2019, Plywood Homes, Inc., issued 20-year, 4% bonds having a face value of...

On January 1, 2019, Plywood Homes, Inc., issued 20-year, 4% bonds having a face value of $1 million. The interest on the bonds is payable semiannually on June 30 and December 31. The proceeds to the company were $975,000 (i.e. on the day they were issued the bonds had a market value of $975,000). On June 30, 2019, the company’s fiscal closing date, when the bonds were being traded at 98.5, each of the following amounts was suggested as a possible valuation basis for reporting the bond liability on the balance sheet.

1. $975,625 (proceeds, plus six months’ straight-line amortization)
2. $1 million (face value)
3. $1,780,000 (face value plus interest payments)

Required:

a. Distinguish between nominal and effective interest rates.
b. Explain the nature of the $25,000 difference between the face value and market value of the bonds on January 1, 2019.
c. Between January 1 and June 30, the market value of the company’s bonds increased from $975,000 to $985,000. Explain. Discuss the significance of the increase to the company.
d. Evaluate each of the three suggested alternatives for reporting the bond liability on the balance sheet, giving arguments for and against each alternative. Your answer should take the investor and the reporting company into consideration.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer:- A).

The Nominal interest rate is also defined as a stated interest rate. This interest works according to the simple interest and does not take into account the compounding periods. An effective interest rate is the one that caters to the compounding periods during a payment plan.

The nominal interest rate is the periodic interest rate times the number of periods per year. For example, a nominal annual interest rate of 12% based on monthly compounding means a 1% interest rate per month (compounded). A nominal interest rate for compounding periods less than a year is always lower than the equivalent rate with annual compounding (this immediately follows from elementary algebraic manipulations of the formula for compound interest). Note that a nominal rate without the compounding frequency is not fully defined: for any interest rate, the effective interest rate cannot be specified without knowing the compounding frequency and the rate. Although some conventions are used where the compounding frequency is understood, consumers, in particular, may fail to understand the importance of knowing the effective rate. Nominal interest rates are not comparable unless their compounding periods are the same; effective interest rates correct for this by "converting" nominal rates into annual compound interest. In many cases, depending on local regulations, interest rates as quoted by lenders and in advertisements are based on nominal, not effective interest rates, and hence may understate the interest rate compared to the equivalent effective annual

In this case, the nominal rate of interest is 4%/2 = 2% whereas the effective rate of interest is 4.04%

Nom - 4.00%, P/YR - 2, EFF - 4.04%

b) The $25,000 difference is the adjustment of the nominal interest rate specified in the bond indenture to the market rate. In other words, for an investment of$975,000 the Company's bondholders will receive an annual interest payment of $40,000 plus $25,000 more than they invested when the bonds mature. Thoughearned throughout the life of the bond contract the bondholders do not receive this portion of the "effective" interest until maturity. This difference is disclosed on the balance sheet as a contra liability in the Discount on Bonds Payable account.

C) The $10,000 increase in the market value of the bonds from January I to June 30is primarily the result of a decrease in the rate of interest at which the Company bonds will trade in the market. The decrease in the market rate of interest at which the bonds will trade may be due to a general change in the conditions of the bond market, to a change in the Company's credit ratings, or to a combination of the two. A minor portion of the increase is due to the fact that the bonds were issued at a discount and are now six months closer to maturity. This portion of the increase is due only to the passage of time and would have taken place without any change in the market rate of interest. In other words, assuming no change in the market rate of interest, the market value of the bonds will increase gradually from $975,000 to$1,000,000 at maturity because of the increase in the present value of the unpaid but accruing interest (discount) of $25,000.Assuming the discount is accumulated on an interest basis, this position of the increase in the market value of the bonds will be reported in the Company'sfinancial statements. The portion of the increase in the market value of the bonds which is due to the decrease in the market rate of interest, though not reported in the financial statements, is significant because only by comparing the effective rate of interest at which the bonds were issued with the current market rate of interest can the Company judge whether or not the rate they are paying is advantageous to them. If the market rate is lower it may be to the Company advantage to refund the old issue even though the funding itself would result in a loss.d.$975,625. This basis for valuing the bond liability--its effective amount as at the date of the issue, plus an accumulated discount on a straight-line basis for the six months since then--is theoretically superior to the other three. It would; however, be more precise to accumulate the discount on an interest basis. The Company actually borrowed $975,000, and the immediate liability incurred can not be more nor less than this amount. The present value of the bond liability is less than maturity value because the effective rate of interest is greater than the nominal rate which appears on the face of the bonds. The actual difference between the present value of the bond liability at the date of issue ($975,000) and its maturity value ($1,000,000) represents that portion of the effective interest on the amount borrowed ($975,000) that will not be paid until maturity. As this amount is accumulated by charges to interest expense and credits to the bond liability, the effective amount of the liability gradually approaches maturity value.

$1,000,000. This basis for valuing bond liabilities, the amount due at maturity, is widely used in practice. Its use is frequently supported on the grounds that it represents the amount of true legal liability since it is this amount that would be due and payable in the event of default. This support disregards the accounting assumption of the going concern and, instead, emphasizes liquidation values. This valuation basis is also supported on the grounds that the discount represents prepaid interest and should, therefore, be classified as an asset. This argument has no merit because the discount represents unpaid interest, not prepaid interest. Any bookkeeping entry which classifies discount as prepaid interest does so only by failing to properly adjust to amount borrowed to its effective amount. The practice of recording bond liabilities at maturity value and setting up the discount as a deferred charge is defensible only if the amounts involved are not material and it can be shown that this treatment is expedient.$1,780,000. The basis for this alternative--the total amount the Company is obligated to repay over the remaining life of the bonds ($1,000,000 at maturity, plus 39 semiannual interest payments of $20,000 each)--has no justification. It would require the difference between the amount actually borrowed ($975,000)and the total amount the Company became obligated to repay ($1,800,000) to be treated as an asset or a loss when the bonds were issued. To assume that assets were acquired in excess of the amount actually borrowed or that a loss was incurred in an arms-length transaction is indefensible. The original bondholders invested $975,000 for the right to receive $1,800,000 under the conditions stipulated in the contract (an annuity of $20,000 for forty periods and $1,000,000at the end of the fortieth period). Thus, at the date of issuance, the Company incurs a liability equal to the amount of the bondholders' investment. The difference between this amount and $1,800,000 is the total amount of interest that will accrue with the passage of time. It does not exist at the date the bonds are issued. Except for the materiality of the amounts involved, the use of this alternative as a valuation basis suffers from the same theoretical shortcomings as does the use office value when bonds are issued at a discount.


Related Solutions

On January 1, 2016, Plywood Homes, Inc., issued 20‐year, 4 percent bonds having a face value...
On January 1, 2016, Plywood Homes, Inc., issued 20‐year, 4 percent bonds having a face value of $1 million. The interest on the bonds is payable semiannually on June 30 and December 31. The proceeds to the company were $975,000 (i.e., on the day they were issued the bonds had a market value of $975,000). On June 30, 2016, the company’s fiscal closing date, when the bonds were being traded at 98 ½, each of the following amounts was suggested...
On January 1, 2019 the Kiner Co. issued three-year bonds with a face value of $68,700...
On January 1, 2019 the Kiner Co. issued three-year bonds with a face value of $68,700 and a stated interest rate of 15.5%. Interest is payable quarterly. The bonds were sold to yield 16%. Calculate the issues price of the bonds.  Show your final answer and show all the work to support your answer. Prepare the bond amortization table using the format covered in class.
On January 1, 2019, ABC Company issued bonds with a face value of $1,000 and a...
On January 1, 2019, ABC Company issued bonds with a face value of $1,000 and a coupon rate of 8 percent. The bonds mature in 2 years and pay interest on June 30 and December 31 each year. The market rate is 12% annually. The present value of $1 table and the present value of annuity of $1 table are provided on the next page. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar. (1) What is the issue price...
Question: Bonds Payable On January 1, 2019, ABC Company issued bonds with a face value of...
Question: Bonds Payable On January 1, 2019, ABC Company issued bonds with a face value of $1,000 and a coupon rate of 8 percent. The bonds mature in 2 years and pay interest on June 30 and December 31 each year. The market rate is 12% annually. The present value of $1 table and the present value of annuity of $1 table are provided on the next page.Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar. (1) What is the...
On January 1, Year 1, Eureka Company issued $120,000 of 6-year, 4% bonds at face value....
On January 1, Year 1, Eureka Company issued $120,000 of 6-year, 4% bonds at face value. The annual cash payment for interest is due on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, Year 2. Based on this information, what is the total amount of liabilities related to these bonds that will be reported on the balance sheet at December 31, Year 1? (Hint: Consider the interest that might be owed to bondholders at December 31, Year 1.)
January 1, 2018: Nexxon corporation issued 20 year, 9% bonds with a face value of $2,000,0000....
January 1, 2018: Nexxon corporation issued 20 year, 9% bonds with a face value of $2,000,0000. the bonds were sold to yield 10%. Interest is payable semi-annually on january 1 and July 1. Effective rate amortization is to be used. 1. what is the issue price of the bonds? 2. Using EXCEL, prepare an amortization table for the entire bond term. 3. Record the bond issuance on 1/1/18 4. assume the company prepares financial statements semi-annually on June 30 and...
On January 1, Landan, Inc. issued a 20-year semiannual bond with a face value of $915,000...
On January 1, Landan, Inc. issued a 20-year semiannual bond with a face value of $915,000 paying 8%. On the date of issue, the market rate for similar bonds was 8%.   Landan would like to know how much this issuance would raise. The following table is a SCRATCH table and will NOT be graded. You may use it, if you wish, to assist you. Provided you answer the other questions correctly, you could leave it blank and still receive full...
On January 1, 2019 Maxxum PLC issued 12% bonds with a face value of £800,000 and...
On January 1, 2019 Maxxum PLC issued 12% bonds with a face value of £800,000 and offering bondholders a 10% yield. The bonds are dated January 1, 2019 and mature January 1, 2024 with interest payable December 31 each year.  (100 POINTS) Instructions Prepare the journal entry at the date of the bond issuance. Prepare a schedule of interest expense and bond amortization for 2019-2021 Prepare the journal entry to record the interest payment and amortization for 2019 Prepare the journal...
On January​ 1, 2017​, Crawford Corporation issued five​-year, 4​% bonds payable with a face value of...
On January​ 1, 2017​, Crawford Corporation issued five​-year, 4​% bonds payable with a face value of $2,600,000. The bonds were issued at 88 and pay interest on January 1 and July 1. Crawford amortizes bond discounts using the​ straight-line method. On December​ 31, 2019​, Crawford retired the bonds early by purchasing them at a market price of 94. The​ company's fiscal year ends on December 31. 1. Journalize the issuance of the bonds on January​ 1, 2017. 2. Record the...
Diaz Company issued bonds with a $110,000 face value on January 1, Year 1. The bonds...
Diaz Company issued bonds with a $110,000 face value on January 1, Year 1. The bonds had a 6 percent stated rate of interest and a 10-year term. Interest is paid in cash annually, beginning December 31, Year 1. The bonds were issued at 96. The straight-line method is used for amortization. Required a. Use a financial statements model like the one shown next to demonstrate how (1) the January 1, Year 1, bond issue and (2) the December 31,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT