Question

1. Do you think the US should continue to use the first-past-the-post electoral system or should we use a different system, such as a rank choice voting system? Explain your answer.

Answer 1

First Past The Post is a “plurality” voting system: the candidate who wins the most votes in each constituency is elected. their first preference, voters may then choose to express further preferences for as many, or as few, candidates as they wish. The count begins by allocating votes in line with first preferences

Yes US should continue to use FPTP . As it has Advantages. Supporters of FPTP argue that its concept is easy to understand, and ballots can more easily be counted and processed than those in preferential voting systems.

Members of Congress are elected in single-member districts according to the "first-past-the-post" (FPTP) principle, meaning that the candidate with the plurality of votes is the winner of the congressional seat. The losing party or parties win no representation at all.

A ranked voting system collects more information from voters compared to the single-mark ballots currently used in most governmental elections, many of which use First-Past-The-Post and Mixed-Member Proportional voting systems. There are many types of ranked voting, with several used in governmental elections.