In: Economics
Suppose that the lump-sum and the proportional tax systems coexist in the economy. Consider the following fiscal policy changes: the government increases the labor income tax rate and gives the money back to the consumer through a decrease in lump-sum tax in a way that an increase in consumer’s labor income tax amount and a decrease in lumpsum tax amount offset each other. Are consumer’s optimal choices affected by these fiscal policy changes? Explain why or why not. (Note: There are opposing effects working in this example. For full credit, you should explain how each effect works on the changes in optimal c and l, followed by the total effect.)
Lump sum tax and prportional tax system coexist in the economy.
The government increases the labor income tax rate and gives the
money back to the consumer through a decrease in lumpsum tax amount
offset each other.
Yes consumer's optimal choices affected by these fiscal policy
changes.
Lump-sum tax is tax based on fixed amount regardless of
circumstances. According to Ricardian equivalence, lump -sum taxes
have zero effect on consumption, investment and output. So even
lump-sum tax decreased or increased, it will not make any effects
consumption, investment and output.
Therefore people would consider only the changes in income tax for
consumption and investment. Thus increase in labor income tax
reduces disposable income of labors and people even lump -sum tax
decreased.
Fall in disposable income reduces consumption and investment level
in the economy. As consumption and investment falls, production and
ouput will decrease