In: Accounting
Martin Corp. had an unfavourable sales price variance of $5700 for 2009. Martin had budgeted for sales of 14 000 units at a sales price of $7 each. Actual sales in 2009 totalled 19 000 units.
What was the actual sales price per unit?
$6.70 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$7.30 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$5.55 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$6.59 McCourt Inc. manufacturers a unique product. The company’s controller has prepared the following static budget for the month of February: Estimated
production 300
units Actual production during February was 275 units and actual direct labour cost was $2900. If McCourt prepares a flexible budget for February, direct labour cost is estimated to be:
|
Solution 1:
Sales Price Variance = (Actual Price - Standard Price) * Actual Sale units
$5700 = (Actual Price - $7) *19,000
$5700/19000 = Actual Price - $7
0.30 = Actual Price - $7
Actual Price = 0.30 + $7 = $7.30
Hence second option is correct.
Solution 2:
Direct Labor Cost in flexible Budget = Actual Production unit * standard rate of Labor
= 275 *1 *$10 = $2,750
Hence, second option is correct.
Solution 3:
For the direct materials usage variance Calculation, Actual quantity used is relevant.
Hence Third option is correct.
Solution 4:
Reason for an unfavourable materials usage variance is that The company underbudgeted the quantity of material to be used for each unit.
Hence third opyion is correct.
Solution 5:
Least likely reason for favourable materials price variance is that the company’s employees were more efficient with the use of their production time.
Hence first option is correct.