In: Economics
Koninklijke Philips NV
Established in 1891 in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Koninklijke
Philips NV is one of...
Koninklijke Philips NV
Established in 1891 in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Koninklijke
Philips NV is one of the world’s oldest multinational companies.
The company began making lighting products and over time
diversified into a range of businesses that included domestic
appliances, consumer electronics, and health care products. From
the beginning, the small Dutch domestic market created pressures
for Philips to look to foreign markets for growth. Some argue that
this is the case for most European companies and, thus, the many
companies from Europe that are globally competitive.
By the start of World War II, Philips already had a global
presence. During the war, the Netherlands was occupied by Germany.
By necessity, the company’s national organizations in countries
such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, United Kingdom, and the United
States gained considerable autonomy during this period. After the
war, a structure based on strong national organizations remained in
place. Each national organization was in essence a self-contained
entity that was responsible for much of its own manufacturing,
marketing, and sales. Most R&D activities, however, were
centralized at Philips’ headquarters in Eindhoven. Reflecting this,
several product divisions were created. Based in Eindhoven, the
product divisions developed technologies and products, which were
then made and sold by the different national organizations. During
this period, the career track of most senior managers at Philips
involved significant postings in various national organizations
around the world (a career development practice often seen still in
multinational corporations).
For several decades this organizational arrangement worked well. It
allowed Philips to customize its product offerings, sales, and
marketing efforts to the conditions that existed in different
national markets. By the 1970s, however, flaws were appearing in
the approach. The structure involved significant duplication of
activities around the world, particularly in manufacturing, which
created an intrinsically high-cost structure. When trade barriers
were high, this did not matter so much, but the significance of its
effect became important when trade barriers were starting to fall
and competitors came in to the marketplace. These competitors
included Sony and Matsushita from Japan, General Electric from the
United States, and Samsung from South Korea. Each of these
competitors gained market share by serving increasingly global
markets from centralized production facilities where they could
achieve greater scale economies and hence lower costs.
Philips’ response was to try to tilt the balance of power in its
structure away from national organizations and toward product
divisions. International production centers were established under
the direction of the product divisions. The national organizations,
however, remained responsible for local marketing and sales, and
they often maintained control over some local production
facilities. One problem Philips faced in trying to change its
structure at this time was that most senior managers had come up
through the national organizations. Consequently, they were loyal
to them and tended to protect their autonomy.
Despite several reorganization efforts, the national organizations
remained a strong influence at Philips until the 1990s. In the
mid-1990s Cor Boonstra became CEO. Page 428He famously described
the company’s organizational structure as a “plate of spaghetti”
and asked how Philips could compete when the company had 350
subsidiaries around the world and significant duplication of
manufacturing and marketing efforts across nations. Boonstra
instituted a radical reorganization. He replaced the company’s 21
product divisions with just 7 global business divisions, making
them responsible for global product development, production, and
marketing. The heads of the divisions reported directly to him,
while the national organizations reported to the divisions. The
national organizations remained responsible for local sales and
local marketing efforts, but after this reorganization they finally
lost their historic sway on the company.
Philips, however, continued to underperform its global rivals. By
2008, Gerard Kleisterlee, who succeeded Boonstra as CEO in 2001,
decided Philips was still not sufficiently focused on global
markets. He reorganized yet again, this time around just three
global divisions, health care, lighting, and consumer lifestyle
(which included the company’s electronics businesses). These are
also the three divisions that are in place under the most recent
CEO, Frans van Houten, who became the CEO of Philips in 2011.
The slogan for the health care division is "creating the future of
healthcare." Philips is a global leader in the health care domain.
It is guided by the understanding that there is a patient in the
center of everything it does in the field of health care, and its
focus is on creating the ideal experience for all patients around
the world, young and old. Philips Lighting is about "enhancing
lives with light" by delivering innovative and energy-efficient
solutions. The Consumer Lifestyle division is dedicated to "helping
people achieve a healthier and better life."
The three divisions are responsible for product strategy, global
marketing, and shifting of production to low-cost locations (or
outsourcing production). The divisions also took over some sales
responsibilities, particularly dealing with global retail chains
such as Walmart, Tesco, and Carrefour. To accommodate national
differences, however, some sales and marketing activities remained
located at the national organizations.
Case Discussion Questions
Why did Philips’ organizational structure make sense early on in
its existence? Why did this structure start to create problems for
the company later on?
What was Philips trying to achieve by tilting the balance of power
in its structure away from national organizations and toward the
product divisions? Why was this hard to achieve?
What was the point of the organizational changes made by Cor
Boonstra? What was he trying to achieve? Do you agree with Frans
van Houten's decision to keep the same three divisions when he
became CEO in 2011?
In 2008 Philips reorganized yet again, now down from 21 divisions
to 9 divisions and subsequently just 3 divisions. Why do you think
it did this? What is it trying to achieve?