In: Economics
A linear utility function represents Hannah’s preference for a boyfriend. There are two relevant attributes – “looks” & “smartness” – of which she weights “smartness” one and half times more than “looks”. Each attribute is measured on a 1(=poor) to 7(=great) scale.
a. Whom does Hannah prefer, Tim (who she believes rates a 5 on looks and a 6 on smartness) or Sam (who she believes rates a 2 on looks and a 6 on smartness)? Explain. (Show Calculation) (5 points)
b. If Hannah has ideal points of 3 for “looks” and 5 for “smartness”, does that change the verdict? Explain. (5 points)
----
Observe that TIm and Sam have same level of
smartness (6) but TIm is better looking (5 > 2).
Hannah's ideal point is (3L, 5S) - which means that Hannah will
prioritize Smartness after basic level of looks 3L has been
achieved; on the flipside Hannah will prioritize looks when the
basic level of smartness 5S has been achieved.
Since both TIm and Sam satisfy the minimum criteria for
smartness (5S), Hannah prefers the one with better looks. TIm is
not only as good as Sam on all counts (both Looks and
Smartness), he's strictly better in the Looks department.
So verdict is still the same: Tim gets lucky.