Question

In: Accounting

Izzah is an auditor of Somuda Bhd. While doing an audit on the company, she discovered...

Izzah is an auditor of Somuda Bhd. While doing an audit on the company, she discovered that one of the directors, Sebastian had committed fraud against the company. She then sent a report to the Registrar of Companies about the fraud. Sebastian found out about this and has now threatened to sue Izzah for defamation.
Will Sebastian succeed in his action?

According tu Companies Act 2016

Solutions

Expert Solution

No, Sebastian would not succeed in his actions.

As per Section 143(12) of the Companies Act 2013 read with the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Amendment Rules, 2015 the provisions relating to reporting of fraud by auditor is as follows:

Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, if an auditor of a company in the course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence of fraud involving such amount or amounts as may be prescribed, is being or has been committed in the company by its officers or employees, the auditor shall report the matter to the Central Government within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed:

Provided that in case of a fraud involving lesser than the specified amount, the auditor shall report the matter to the audit committee constituted under section 177 or to the Board in other cases within such time and in such manner as may be prescribed:

Provided further that the companies, whose auditors have reported frauds under this sub-section to the audit committee or the Board but not reported to the Central Government, shall disclose the details about such frauds in the Board’s report in such manner as may be prescribed.”

Explanation : If an auditor of a company, in the course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has sufficient reason to believe that an offence involving fraud, is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, he shall report the matter in the manner stated hereinafter.

No duty to which an auditor of a company may be subject to shall be regarded as having been contravened by reason of his reporting the matter as referred above if it is done in good faith.

Penalty for failure to disclose fraud;

As per Section 143(12), an Auditor is duty bound that if in the course of the performance of his duties as auditor, he has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, he shall immediately report the matter to the Central Government. In case of any failure on his part to comply with this duty, he shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs.1,00,000/- but which may extend to Rs.25,00,000/-.

Therefore, in the given senario , it was a legal duty to report fraud done by Sebastian, which she discovered in the course of audit. The inability to do so would make her liable to penalty given in Section 143 of the Act


Related Solutions

The auditor is sued for audit failure. If it is discovered that the auditor was not...
The auditor is sued for audit failure. If it is discovered that the auditor was not independent and that the auditor knew about their lack of independence, what would be their most likely defense? Describe why Please completely answer in 1-2 paragraphs.
CORPORATE LAW OK Sdn Bhd had appointed Razif to audit the company's account. While doing the...
CORPORATE LAW OK Sdn Bhd had appointed Razif to audit the company's account. While doing the audit, Razif discovered several invoices that showed signs of having been altered. He also found that some files were missing from the file cabinets in the accounts office. He enquired about it and the company's managing director, Tuan Suhaimi, told him that the company's office was broken into a few weeks before and some files had been stolen. Tuan Suhaimi also informed Razif that...
During the course of the 2017 audit of Smithson Company, the auditor discovered the following situations...
During the course of the 2017 audit of Smithson Company, the auditor discovered the following situations that may or may not require an adjusting journal entry. Each audit finding is independent of any of the other findings. Indicate the adjusting journal entry, if required, to correct the audit finding. If no entry is required, indicate whether or not a related footnote should be included in the financial statements. Would any of the findings cause you to consider increasing your assessment...
An auditor discovered an error while conducting Black Inc.'s 2016 audit. No errors were corrected during...
An auditor discovered an error while conducting Black Inc.'s 2016 audit. No errors were corrected during 2015. A 2 year insurance policy was purchased on April 30, 2015. This policy resulted in $24,000 being debited to Prepaid Insurance [On April 30, 2015]. However, no adjustmnet was made on December 31, 2015 or on December 31, 2016. Required: Prepare the appropriate journal entries. Assume the 2016 books have not been closed but the tax entries have been completed. The tax rate...
During the course of the audit of Nature Sporting Goods, the auditor discovered the following: The...
During the course of the audit of Nature Sporting Goods, the auditor discovered the following: The accounts receivable confirmation work revealed one pricing misstatement. The book value of $12,955.68 should be $11,984.00. The total misstatement based on this difference is $14,465, which includes a $972 known misstatement and an unknown projected misstatement of $13,493. Nature Sporting Goods had understated the accrued vacation pay by $13,000. A review of the prior-year documentation indicates the following uncorrected misstatements: Accrued vacation pay was...
The following issues were discovered by the audit team while performing the audit of Matador Corporation....
The following issues were discovered by the audit team while performing the audit of Matador Corporation. Consider each issue independently. 1. Some inventory items sitting in the warehouse were not included in Matador’s inventory account balance. 2. Matador recorded service revenue, but there is no evidence any service work was performed. 3. The fair value for financial instruments (i.e., investments) reported on the balance sheet differs significantly from the audit team’s own determination of the investment’s fair value. 4. In...
Revenue cycle case question (Audit I) Aman & Afdal is the auditor of Warisan Sdn Bhd.
REVENUE CASE 3Aman & Afdal is the auditor of Warisan Sdn Bhd. He is in charge of auditing the sales and collection cycle for the company which is a small fish distributor in East Malaysia. The company is respected for its high-quality fish products, but its accounting office is perpetually neglected, and the sales department frequently makes errors in billing clients. In previous years, Aman & Afdal has found quite a few misstatements in billings, cash receipts, and accounts receivable....
Jane Smith is an auditor with APMG, a national audit firm. She is currently working on...
Jane Smith is an auditor with APMG, a national audit firm. She is currently working on the annualaudit of the fnancial report of Orange Pty Ltd (Orange), a transport company. While undertaking thepreliminary assessment of internal controls, Jane became aware that Orange was using an information system that had been purchased from her previous employer, Add Right Pty Ltd (AddRight). When Jane gave her evaluation of Orange's internal controls to her manager, Derek White, Derekstated that he was surprised at...
Parker is the in-charge auditor for the upcoming annual audit of FGH Company, a continuing audit...
Parker is the in-charge auditor for the upcoming annual audit of FGH Company, a continuing audit client. Parker will supervise two assistants on the engagement and will visit the entity before the fieldwork begins. Parker has completed the engagement letter and established an understanding with the Chief Internal Auditor on the assistance to be provided by the internal audit function. Which of the following activities should be considered as preliminary engagement and planning activities? (Select all that apply.) Check All...
Parker is the in-charge auditor for the upcoming annual audit of FGH Company, a continuing audit...
Parker is the in-charge auditor for the upcoming annual audit of FGH Company, a continuing audit client. Parker will supervise two assistants on the engagement and will visit the entity before the fieldwork begins. Parker has completed the engagement letter and established an understanding with the Chief Internal Auditor on the assistance to be provided by the internal audit function. Which of the following activities should be considered as preliminary engagement and planning activities? (Select all that apply.) Check All...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT