In: Economics
CPP is interested in comparing if they should maintain the current lighting fixtures in Building 9 that has a life-cycle cost (NPV) of $50,000 or invest in new, indirect lighting fixtures in Building 9. The cost for the new fixture is $12,000 with savings of $1,000/year. A rebate will be granted after two years of operation for $1,500. Study period is 15 years. The university uses an annual rate of return of 4%. Calculate the life-cycle cost (i.e. NPV) for the new fixtures and advise if CPP should change the current fixture to the new ones.
NPV of current lighting fixtures = $50,000
Rate of Return = 4%
Study period = 15 years
Cost of new fixture = $12,000
Saving per year = $1,000
Rebate after 2 years = $1,500
Present value of saving in year 1 = [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^1]
Present value of saving in year 1 = [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^2]
Present value of saving in year 1 = [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^3]
and so on....
This forms a G.P. whose sum is = [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^1] + [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^2] + [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^3] + ........... + [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^15]
Sum of G.P. = [a * (1 - r^n) / (1 - r)]
a = [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^1]
r (ratio of two consecutive terms) = (1 / 1.04) = 0.961
n = 15
Sum of series = [1,000 / (1 + 0.04)^1] * (1 - 0.961^15) / (1 - 0.961) = 11,118.39
Present value of subsidy which is given after 2 years = [1,500 / (1 + 0.04)^2] = 1,386.83
Net present value of new fixture = -12,000 + 11,118.39 + 1,386.83 = 505.22
As net present value of keeping the current lighting fixture is more than building new fixture, they should keep current fixture.