Question

In: Accounting

In financial statements and tax filings the absorption cost approach makes more sense as it does...

In financial statements and tax filings the absorption cost approach makes more sense as it does not give management any choice in shifting costs. This affects NPV analysis, though, management is responsible for all costs and this can also lead to analytical problems. For example, factory depreciation costs are not part of production, and many believe, including me, that when looking at product costs, these should not be considered. While they are a part of the business, including these costs will often lead to bad decision making. If a product costs 75 and sells for 90, then all else being equal it should be sold. If we, however, include fixed manufacturing overhead in the cost, the item may seem to have a cost of 100 which is above cost, and so it should not be sold. This would be an error as the administrative overhead would remain as a cost, and we would lose the 15 per unit we could earn to offset this cost.

Thoughts/Questions?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Absorbtion cost is an approach /method to capture all associated costs related to manfacturing a product,including fixed over heads

generally depreciation which is fixed overhead  will treated as indirect cost such that it will be not included in product cost ,more particularly while taking a decisions on basis of incremental costing.

But depreciation is incurred while manfacturing of products : eg use of machinery, etc such that it is associated to manfacturing of product

In absorbtion costing any fixed over head costs will be alloated to the products manfcatured such that it will increase the cost of a product, where as in variable cost approach it will be not associated to product such that it will be treated as expense as sepertae line item .

generally any factory depreciation which is related to specifc manfacturing a product will be treated as productt cost for the particular product then it will be added to cost which is very influential in decison making, these costs will be considered while decison making

if we include fixed manfacturing over head as part of cost it will increase the cost of product which makes incompetent in the market ., so by analyisng the situation fixed costs is considered only to recover the cost once fixed manfacturing costs recovers then our manfacturing costs will be considered for decision making


Related Solutions

Decide whether each of the following statements makes sense (or is clearly true) or does not...
Decide whether each of the following statements makes sense (or is clearly true) or does not make sense (or is clearly false). Explain your reasoning. 1. I haven't won in my last 25 pulls on the slot machine, so I'm due to win on the next pull 2. The larger a sample you take, the more the population looks like a normal distribution 3. The larger a sample you take, the closer the sample itself is to being normally distributed
Because the absorption-cost approach includes allocated fixed costs, it does not clarify how the company’s costs...
Because the absorption-cost approach includes allocated fixed costs, it does not clarify how the company’s costs will change as the sales volume changes. Identify three specific reasons why some managers prefer the variable-cost approach.
‘Income tax shall be paid on taxable income times tax rate. It makes sense to pay...
‘Income tax shall be paid on taxable income times tax rate. It makes sense to pay income tax for current year, but we should not be asked to account for deferred tax assets and liabilities’. Do you agree with this statement? Discuss your arguments.
Are there any scenarios that you can think of that makes more sense to get the...
Are there any scenarios that you can think of that makes more sense to get the money in the future versus today? What about lottery winnings? Would you prefer the winnings now or payouts over a period of time?
How does the market failures approach understand the morality of the market? In what sense is...
How does the market failures approach understand the morality of the market? In what sense is this morality, and perhaps also business ethics more generally, a “third best” evaluative framework (see p. 185-186 in particular)? What common misconceptions does such a framework correct?
Which of the following statements regarding absorption cost pricing formulas is/are true? i. Absorption cost pricing...
Which of the following statements regarding absorption cost pricing formulas is/are true? i. Absorption cost pricing formulas provide a justifiable price that tends to be perceived as equitable by all parties. ii. Since absorption cost information is necessary for external reporting, it is cost effective to use it for pricing. iii. Absorption cost-plus pricing formulas generally will result in a higher mark-up percentage than variable manufacturing cost formulas. All of the given answers i and ii i and iii ii...
Based on your understanding of depreciation and tax rates do you think that it makes sense...
Based on your understanding of depreciation and tax rates do you think that it makes sense for organizations to receive a tax benefit for depreciating capital assets? minimum 200 words
Which method makes more theoretical sense—the gross method or the net method? Why? Why don’t more...
Which method makes more theoretical sense—the gross method or the net method? Why? Why don’t more firms use the net method?
Does it make more sense to debate the level of debt or the debt to GDP...
Does it make more sense to debate the level of debt or the debt to GDP ratio? Explain. Please state yes or no before going into details Based on the national saving and investment identity, explain how each of the following might react to greater government budget deficits. Be sure to consider all possibilities. a. Private saving Increases with the Gov Deficit b. Investment c. Savings by the rest of the world
Which makes more sense to you: Hinduism’s vision of the “True Self”, infinite unchanging being, and...
Which makes more sense to you: Hinduism’s vision of the “True Self”, infinite unchanging being, and permanence? Or Buddhism’s vision of “no self”, “emptiness” and impermanence)? Why? Can you give examples?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT