Propaganda techniques in Obama’s acceptance speech

Expert Solution

President Obama used propaganda techniques - name calling; glittering generalities; testimonial; bandwagon; plain folks; transfer; and card-stacking in his acceptance speech.

Name calling: Instead of acknowledging Republicans to be worthy Americans that holds different ideology, he shortened the challenges to his agenda by stating it a matter of the games that Washington plays.

Glittering Generalities: Obama’s acceptance speech was full of nice words to show it's concern on ideology, like patriotism or goodness.

Testimonial: Obama endorses the ideology by stating that Gates were making new innovations.

Bandwagon: Obama appealed all to be the part of climate protector

Plain Folks: He stoked a sense of compassion and responsibility by stating that Americans should live lives today however without condemning the climate for the next generation.

Transfer: He appealed all that in helping to solve the problem of climate change by being a part of a bright, shining progressive ideology on a hill.

Card-stacking: He manipulated information for the better appearance of ideology usually by unfair comparison or omitting facts

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

Connect Obama’s speech to Just War Theory. Make specific connections between Just War principles and the...

Connect Obama’s speech to Just War Theory. Make specific connections between Just War principles and the speech content. You may also use Responsibility to Protect, but again by connecting to specific principles.

Write and elaborate techniques for types of speech introductions

In their acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize in 1985, Michael Brown and Joseph Goldstein said,...

In their acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize in 1985, Michael Brown and Joseph Goldstein said, “Cholesterol is a Janus-faced molecule. The very property that makes it useful in cell membranes, namely its absolute insolubility in water, also makes it lethal.” Can you explain this remark?

essay on Explain the ways in which propaganda can be good or bad. If propaganda has...

essay on Explain the ways in which propaganda can be good or bad. If propaganda has a social goal most people embrace, does that make the propaganda acceptable? Does it make its techniques acceptable and ethical?

What was the consequence of the enemy alien propaganda? (US History Question)

Speech Analysis For our next speech analysis, we’ll take a look at a speech from Julian...

Speech Analysis For our next speech analysis, we’ll take a look at a speech from Julian Treasure, a speaker for Ted Talk. In this speech he talks about speaking so that people want to listen. There is power in our vocal image! Evaluate the speaker’s presentation as if you were grading his effort. What do you notice about his posture? His language? What type of vocabulary and terminology are you hearing, that you don’t normally hear? What skills did Julian...

A) Why might news media outlets engage in propaganda , sophistic objectivity , or sociocentrism ?...

A) Why might news media outlets engage in propaganda , sophistic objectivity , or sociocentrism ? B) What alternative sources of information would you suggest in terms of securing less biased information and news sources? Why do you suggest these?

Is public diplomacy a euphemism for propaganda? Why or why not? How should a state pursue...

Is public diplomacy a euphemism for propaganda? Why or why not? How should a state pursue its public diplomacy? What are the main purposes?

The time from acceptance to maturity on a $50,000 banker's acceptance is 180 days. The importing...

The time from acceptance to maturity on a $50,000 banker's acceptance is 180 days. The importing bank's acceptance commission is 2.50 percent and the market rate for 180-day B/As is 2 percent. If the exporter's opportunity cost of capital is 11 percent, should he discount the B/A or hold it to maturity?

What are the difference and similarities between a speech of explanation and a speech of description?...

What are the difference and similarities between a speech of explanation and a speech of description? How can the five goals of informative speaking be fulfilled when giving these types of speeches?

Question