In: Statistics and Probability
he following is the results if three measures of language capacity following brain damage to the area of the brain associated with receptive language
Person |
Speech |
Conceptual |
Syntax |
1 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
7 |
4 |
Perform a RM ANOVA with any post-hoc tests. You do not have to make corrections to a violation of sphericity
n= | 6 |
k= | 3 |
N= | 18 |
G= | 106 |
ΣX²= | 676 |
correction factor,cf=G²/N=
624.2222222
SSTreatment=1/nΣT²-cf=
19.44444444
df=k-1= 2
total SS=ΣX²-cf=
51.77777778
df=N-1= 17
error SS=total SS-treatment SS=
32.33333333
df error=N-k= 15
PSS=1/kΣP²-cf=
13.11111111
df=n-1= 5
SS error=ESS-PSS=
19.22222222
Table | ||||||
Source | SS | df | MSS | F | F-critic | P-Value |
B/w groups | 19.4444 | 2 | 9.7222 | 5.0578 | 4.10 | 0.0304 |
Within Group | 32.3333 | 15 | 2.1556 | |||
i) B/w Subject | 13.1111 | 5 | 2.6222 | |||
ii) Error | 19.2222 | 10 | 1.9222 | |||
Total: | 51.7778 | 17 | α= | 0.05 |
Decision: p-value<α , reject null
hypothesis
conclusion : there is enough evidence of significant
mean difference among three treatments