Question
In: Psychology
Explain the elements of the Free Will debate. Do you think that we ultimately have free...
Explain the elements of the Free Will debate. Do you think that we ultimately have free will, or that our actions are mostly determined by our environment, genetic factors, and/or the time period when we are born?
Please write an initial post of at least 200 words
Solutions
Expert Solution
Note: This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. You may elaborate the answer based on personal views or your classwork if necessary.
(Answer) In order to fully understand the notion of whether or not one has absolute free-will, the hypothesis would have to be tested and not merely stated without any evidence. Let us assume that John Doe is a Democrat. As a part of his research on free-will, he decides to go to Alabama and put up a table at a local fair. At his table, he talks about the flaws in the Republican Party and the ethics of the Democratic Party.
His actions would be equal to wearing the wrong colours at a sports game. One might have an absolute free will to conduct free speech or actions that do not hurt anyone or usurp the freedom of another. This can only be determined by the reception of the public.
John Doe is likely to be sent away from the public fair even though he did not hurt anyone or incite hate through his speech. This reaction would be revoked because the people around him simply disagree with his opinions. On the other hand, people might come to his table and engage in a formal debate or a discourse of different options. In the second scenario, John and the people around him might disagree but, they do not attempt to thwart each other because of a different opinion.
This might be so for a democracy that exercises the freedom of speech. The situation might be entirely different in a state that does not particularly encourage a free press. Considering that there are several factors that might attempt to curb individuals who do not agree with popular opinions or autocratic leaders, it is safe to assume that free will is not absolute and might be circumstantial.
Hayet Jeridi answered 2 years agoRelated Solutions
Defunding the police What logical fallacies do you see being used in the debate? And ultimately,...
Do you believe we have free will, and why? If you don’t believe in free will,...
What do you think about this so-called “Shareholder vs. Stakeholder” debate? Do you have any personal...
Which factors and sociological perspective do you think best explain the changes that we have seen...
What do you think about free trade agreements Canada has entered into? Recently, we signed a...
Recently, we have observed that wages in China have been increasing. What do you think will...
What do you think about Free Hugs videoclip? Ok
Which of the steps involved in historical research that we have described do you think would...
Discuss the significance of a proposal What elements do you think are needed for the proposal...
do you think we should be testing on animal and using them for research? explain why?
- Suggest journal, research paper link reference. i need this as reference for writing a research with...
- Cryptography is used heavily in internet communications. True or false? Explain
- Suppose Rialto is the only movie cinema in a small college town, so it is essentially...
- With VMI, members of the supply chain share planning, demand, forecasting, and inventory information.
- Large lots are desirable in supply chain coordination despite increasing holding costs.
- ***Convert the C++ to Python*** #include <iostream> using std::cout; using std::cin; using std::endl; int charClass; char...
- Make-or-Buy Decision Fremont Computer Company has been purchasing carrying cases for its portable computers at a...