Question

In: Economics

Problem 2. Consider a duopoly with identical firms with no fixed cost and marginal cost of...

Problem 2. Consider a duopoly with identical firms with no fixed cost and marginal cost of c. Let the
inverse demand curve for the industry be p(Y ) = A − bY , where Y is the total industry output. Let y1 and
y2 be the output of each firm. Assume that the firms in the industry each choose quantity, and then let the
market determine the price they will receive.
(a) Compute the total market output, the price, the quantity for each firm, and the profit for each

firm, under Cournot competition. Make sure to start at the beginning, setting up each firm’s profit-
maximization problem and proceeding from there.

(b) Compute the total market output, the price, the quantity for each firm, and the profit for each firm, if
the firms collude and choose their quantities together to maximize total profits. Assume that they split
the total output evenly. Again, make sure to set up the joint profit-maximization problem and proceed
from there. [Hint: you will find that you cannot solve the system of two first-order conditions. Indeed,
you will find that the two first-order conditions are identical, leaving you with only one equation with
two unknowns. To solve this problem, simply take advantage of the assumption that they split the
market evenly, y1 = y2. Now you have two equations with two unknowns.]
(c) Now suppose that one firm sticks to the collusive quanity, while the other one cheats. Compute the
profit maximizing output of the cheater, the market price, and the profit for each firm.

Econ 100A, Fall 2019
Prof: Dan Acland

Problem Set #12
Page 2

(d) Using the results you have computed above, argue that the collusive agreement is not a Nash equi-
librium. In addition, argue that if firms have common knowledge of rationality (each knows that the

other is rational, and knows that the other knows they are rational, etc) the only Nash equilibrium is
for both firms to choose the Cournot equilibrium quantity.
(e) Again, using the results you have computed above, argue that this situation can be thought of as a
prisoner’s dilemma. (Recall that we characterized a prisoner’s dilemma as a situation in which agents
are unable to cooperate, even when to do so would maximize their individual payoffs, because the
private cost of cooperation is greater than the private benefit of cooperation.)

Solutions

Expert Solution

We are supposed to do only four sub-parts to a question. For solution to other parts of the question please post as separate question.


Related Solutions

Consider the Stackelberg duopoly but with different firms. In particular, the marginal cost of Firm A...
Consider the Stackelberg duopoly but with different firms. In particular, the marginal cost of Firm A (leader) is cA and the marginal cost of Firm B (follower) is cB with 0 < cA < cB. We also need to make the following additional assumptions (for the equilibrium to make sense): (a) a > cA, (b) a > cB, and (c) a + 2cA ? 3cB > 0. What is the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium?
(a) [15 marks] Consider two identical firms with no fixed costs and constant marginal cost c...
(a) [15 marks] Consider two identical firms with no fixed costs and constant marginal cost c which compete in quantities in each of an infinite number of periods. The quantities chosen are observed by both firms before the next round of play begins. The inverse demand is given by p = 1 − q1 − q2, where q1 is the quantity produced by firm 1 and q2 is the quantity produced by firm 2. The firms use ‘trigger strategies’ and...
Consider a price-setting oligopoly with 4 identical firms, all with constant marginal cost c. The firms...
Consider a price-setting oligopoly with 4 identical firms, all with constant marginal cost c. The firms compete for an infinite number of periods and have the same discount factor. Derive the minimum discount factor such that there exists a collusive equlibirum with monopoly pricing.
Two identical firms compete in a Bertrand duopoly. The firms produce identical products at the same...
Two identical firms compete in a Bertrand duopoly. The firms produce identical products at the same constant marginal cost of MC = $10. There are 2000 identical consumers, each with the same reservation price of $30 for a single unit of the product (and $0 for any additional units). Under all of the standard assumptions made for the Bertrand model, the equilibrium prices would be Group of answer choices $10 for both firms $30 for both firms $50 for both...
Problem 1. Consider a Cournot game with n > 2 firms, where all firms are identical....
Problem 1. Consider a Cournot game with n > 2 firms, where all firms are identical. Assume the linear demand and cost functions. Solve for the symmetric Nash equilibrium. Find the price at which output is sold in the Nash equilibrium and show that the equilibrium price approaches the unit cost of production, as the number of firms increases arbitrarily. Comment on your result. Payoff function for firm 1: ?(q1, q2,...,qn) = {? - (q1 + q2 + q3 +......
Suppose that identical duopoly firms have constant marginal costs of ​$16 per unit. Firm 1 faces...
Suppose that identical duopoly firms have constant marginal costs of ​$16 per unit. Firm 1 faces a demand function of: q1=70-2(p1)+1(p2) where q 1 is Firm​ 1's output, p1 is Firm​ 1's price, and p 2 is Firm​ 2's price. ​ Similarly, the demand Firm 2 faces is: q2=70-2(p2)+1(p1) Solve for the Bertrand Equilibrium: In equilibrium (p1) equals _ and (p2) equals _
Consider a Cournot duopoly of two identical cigarette producing firms, Warlboro and Cramel. They produce tobacco...
Consider a Cournot duopoly of two identical cigarette producing firms, Warlboro and Cramel. They produce tobacco of same quality and, ceteris paribus, each firm sells to 1 million smokers, making $100 profits per smoker. These 2 million smokers are addicts (as most smokers are). They may change which tobacco they smoke but they do not quit. On the other hand, those who are not smokers will not start even if they are encouraged (because they understand the harm). In other...
Consider a Cournot duopoly of two identical cigarette producing firms, Warlboro and Cramel. They produce tobacco...
Consider a Cournot duopoly of two identical cigarette producing firms, Warlboro and Cramel. They produce tobacco of same quality and, ceteris paribus, each firm sells to 1 million smokers, making $100 profits per smoker. These 2 million smokers are addicts (as most smokers are). They may change which tobacco they smoke but they do not quit. On the other hand, those who are not smokers will not start even if they are encouraged (because they understand the harm). In other...
The Toy business has 4 firms. All firms have an identical marginal cost of MC =...
The Toy business has 4 firms. All firms have an identical marginal cost of MC = 9 and a fixed cost of 0. The market demand for Toys is T=200-20P were T is quantity and P is price of Toys. 1. If P=8.5 how much could a firm produce 2. In a short run equili. could the equili. price be P>9? 3. In a SR equili. all firms produce the same amount of toys. What is the equili price, total...
Problem 1: Consider the following Bertrand duopoly: two firms (A and B) are operating in a...
Problem 1: Consider the following Bertrand duopoly: two firms (A and B) are operating in a market where they produce identical products and compete on price. Assume that the market demand can be written as ? = 50 − ?. Assume that neither firm is capacity constrained so that either firm can satisfy the market demand at any price. Suppose further that the profit function for each firm can be written as ? = ?? − ?? = (? −...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT