Question

In: Accounting

1. For many years, Leno Corporation has used a straightforward cost-plus pricing system, marking its goods...

1. For many years, Leno Corporation has used a straightforward cost-plus pricing system, marking its goods up approximately 25 percent of total cost. The company has been profitable; however, it has recently lost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very aggressive in the marketplace. These firms appear to be using target costing.

An example of Leno’s problem is typified by item no. 8976, which has the following unit-cost characteristics:

Direct material $ 100
Direct labor 230
Manufacturing overhead 150
Selling and administrative expenses 80

The going market price for an identical product of comparable quality is $610, which is significantly below what Leno is charging.

-What is Leno’s current selling price of item no. 8976?

-If Leno used target costing for item no. 8976, what must happen to costs if the company desires to meet the market price and maintain its current rate of profit on sales? By how much?

-Suppose that by previous cost-cutting drives, costs had already been “pared to the bone” on item no. 8976. What might Leno be forced to do with its markup on cost to remain competitive? By how much?

-iTRUE OR FALSE) in many industries, prices are the result of an interaction between market forces and costs.

2. The following data pertain to Lawn Master Corporation’s top-of-the-line lawn mower.

Variable manufacturing cost $ 317
Applied fixed manufacturing cost 41
Variable selling and administrative cost 62
Allocated fixed selling and administrative cost ?

To achieve a target price of $516 per lawn mower, the markup percentage is 12.1 percent on total unit cost.

Required:

  1. What is the fixed selling and administrative cost allocated to each unit of Lawn Master’s top-of-the-line mower? (Do not round your intermediate computations. Round your final answer to the nearest dollar amount.)
  2. For each of the following cost bases, develop a cost-plus pricing formula that will result in a target price of $516 per mower: (Round your percentage answers to 2 decimal places (i.e., .1234 should be entered as 12.34).)
Cost-Plus Pricing Formula
(a) Variable manufacturing cost $516 = + ( % × )
(b) Absorption manufacturing cost $516 = + ( % × )
(c) Total variable cost $516 = + ( % × )

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer: Leno’s current selling price of item no. 8976

Particulars                                                                              Amount($)

Direct material                                                                                    100

Direct labour                                                                           230

Prime Cost                                                                             330

Manufacturing overhead                                                        150

Cost of Production                                                               480

Selling and administrative expenses                                      80

Cost of Sales                                                                         560

+Profit                                                                                     140

Selling Price                                                                          700

If Leno used target costing for item no. 8976, what must happen to costs if the company desires to meet the market price and maintain its current rate of profit on sales? By how much?

Selling Price =$ 610

Profit = ¼ on Cost = 1/5 on Selling Price

Profit = 610 * 1/5 = $122

So, Cost Price = 610 -122 = $488

So, cost price to be reduced by = 560 – 488 = $72

Suppose that by previous cost-cutting drives, costs had already been “pared to the bone” on item no. 8976. What might Leno be forced to do with its markup on cost to remain competitive? By how much?

Then Profit = 610 – 560 = $ 50

So Profit on cost = 50 / 560 =8.93%

So, profit markup to be reduced by 16.07%.

(TRUE OR FALSE) in many industries, prices are the result of an interaction between market forces and costs.

True.

What is the fixed selling and administrative cost allocated to each unit of Lawn Master’s top-of-the-line mower? (Do not round your intermediate computations. Round your final answer to the nearest dollar amount.)

Particulars                                                                              Amount($)

Variable manufacturing cost                                                   317

Applied fixed manufacturing cost                                           41

Variable selling and administrative cost                                  62

Allocated fixed selling and administrative cost (B.F.)             167

Total Cost       (516 / 112.1%)                                               460

Profit                                                                                       56

Selling Price                                                                          516

For each of the following cost bases, develop a cost-plus pricing formula that will result in a target price of $516 per mower: (Round your percentage answers to 2 decimal places (i.e., .1234 should be entered as 12.34).)

Cost-Plus Pricing Formula

(a)

Variable manufacturing cost

$516     = 317 + 62.78% or 317 (1.6278)

(b)

Absorption manufacturing cost

$516     = 41 + 1158.54% or 41 (12.5854)

(c)

Total variable cost

$516     = 379 + 36.15% or 379 (1.3615)


Related Solutions

Terra Potteryworks is a price−setter that uses the cost−plus pricing approach for pricing its products. These...
Terra Potteryworks is a price−setter that uses the cost−plus pricing approach for pricing its products. These products are​ unique, artistically designed architectural decorations. Terra produces and sells 6,200 units per​ year, which represent maximum capacity. Variable costs are $320.00 per unit. Total fixed costs are $920,000 per year. The CEO has a target of $40,000 in operating​ income, which he wants to achieve by year−end. Using the cost−plus pricing​ method, what sales price per unit should Terra​ use? (Round your...
Company B sets its prices for all hospitals by marking up its cost of goods sold...
Company B sets its prices for all hospitals by marking up its cost of goods sold to those hospitals by 6%. For years, Company B believed that the 6% markup covered its selling and administrative expenses and provided a reasonable profit. However, in the face of declining profits, Company B decided to implement an activity-based costing system to help improve its understanding of customer profitability. The company broke its selling and administrative expenses into five activities as shown: Activity Cost...
LV2-a Company has used a two-stage, reciprocal method cost allocation system for many years. In the...
LV2-a Company has used a two-stage, reciprocal method cost allocation system for many years. In the first stage, overhead costs from its two service departments (repair and administration) are allocated to its two production departments (molding and assembly) based on the following activity levels: repair - repair hours administration - # of employees In the second stage, LV2-a calculates pre-determined overhead rates in the production departments using the following activity levels: molding - machine hours assembly - direct labor hours...
Assume that Sweeten Company used cost-plus pricing (and a markup percentage of 80% of total manufacturing cost) to establish selling prices for all of its jobs.
  Sweeten Company had no jobs in progress at the beginning of March and no beginning inventories. The company has two manufacturing departments—Molding and Fabrication. It started, completed, and sold only two jobs during March—Job P and Job Q. The following additional information is available for the company as a whole and for Jobs P and Q (all data and questions relate to the month of March):   Molding Fabrication Total Estimated total machine-hours used   2,500     1,500...
Taylor Corporation has used a periodic inventory system and the LIFO cost method since its inception...
Taylor Corporation has used a periodic inventory system and the LIFO cost method since its inception in 2011. The company began 2018 with the following inventory layers (listed in chronological order of acquisition): 15,000 units @ $10 $ 150,000 20,000 units @ $15 300,000 Beginning inventory $ 450,000 During 2018, 40,000 units were purchased for $20 per unit. Due to unexpected demand for the company's product, 2018 sales totaled 49,000 units at various prices, leaving 26,000 units in ending inventory....
The United Colours Corporation has $20 million in Sales, and its cost of goods sold is...
The United Colours Corporation has $20 million in Sales, and its cost of goods sold is $15 million. The average inventory balance for the company is $10 million. In order to meet the industry average of 80 days, how would the firm have to change its investment in INVENTORY? Select one: a. Decrease by $7.95 million b. Decrease by $2.05 million c. Increase by $2.05 million d. Increase by $7.95 million
Merchandiser Corp. has been in business for 40 years and values its cost of goods sold...
Merchandiser Corp. has been in business for 40 years and values its cost of goods sold and ending inventory using the LIFO costing method. The current year has been particularly unprofitable and Merchandiser Corp. is under significant investor pressure to finish the year with some good news. Merchandiser Corp's chief financial officer (CFO) has approached the president about a way to substantially increase earnings. She suggest that LIFO stop purchasing inventory the last couple months of the year. Since Merchandiser...
In a periodic inventory system, the formula used in computing the cost of goods sold may...
In a periodic inventory system, the formula used in computing the cost of goods sold may be summarized as follows: Select one: A. Beginning inventory + purchases - net sales. B. Balance in the Cost of Goods Sold account, less the balance in the Inventory Shrinkage account. C. Beginning inventory + purchases - ending inventory. D. Ending inventory + purchases - net sales.
The Rockwell Corporation uses a periodic inventory system and has used the FIFO cost method since...
The Rockwell Corporation uses a periodic inventory system and has used the FIFO cost method since inception of the company in 1979. In 2018, the company decided to change to the average cost method. Data for 2018 are as follows: Beginning inventory, FIFO (5,500 units @ $35.00) $ 192,500 Purchases: 5,500 units @ $41.00 $ 225,500 5,500 units @ $45.00 247,500 473,000 Cost of goods available for sale $ 665,500 Sales for 2018 (9,000 units @ $75.00) $ 675,000 Additional...
The Rockwell Corporation uses a periodic inventory system and has used the FIFO cost method since...
The Rockwell Corporation uses a periodic inventory system and has used the FIFO cost method since inception of the company in 1982. In 2021, the company decided to change to the average cost method. Data for 2021 are as follows: Beginning inventory, FIFO (5,400 units @ $34.00) $ 183,600 Purchases: 5,400 units @ $40.00 $ 216,000 5,400 units @ $44.00 237,600 453,600 Cost of goods available for sale $ 637,200 Sales for 2021 (8,800 units @ $74.00) $ 651,200 Additional...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT