Question

In: Economics

1. The multiplier effect Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no international...

1. The multiplier effect

Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no international trade. Households spend $0.90 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.10. If there are no taxes and no international trade, the oversimplified multiplier for this economy is.

Suppose investment spending in this economy decreases by $200 billion. The decrease in investment will lead to a decrease in income, generating a decrease in consumption that decreases income yet again, and so on.

Fill in the following table to show the impact of the change in investment spending on the first two rounds of consumption spending and, eventually, on total output and income.

Change in Investment SpendingChange in Investment Spending =    ?$200 billion?$200 billion
First Change in ConsumptionFirst Change in Consumption =    billion
Second Change in ConsumptionSecond Change in Consumption =    billion
•• ••
•• ••
•• ••
Total Change in OutputTotal Change in Output =    billion

Now consider a more realistic case. Specifically, assume that our hypothetical economy opens up to international trade and that its government collects taxes. In this case, the multiplier will be the oversimplified multiplier you found earlier.

Suppose that the price level in our economy remains the same but now, out of each additional dollar of income, households save $0.10, pay $0.05 in taxes, and spend $0.10 on imported goods. In this case, accounting for the impact of taxes and imports, the multiplier in this economy is, and a $200 billion decrease in investment spending will lead to abillion in output.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Multiplier in case of no taxes and no imports = 1/1-MPC = 1/1-0.9 = 10

Change in Investment Spending =    ?$200 billion
First Change in Consumption =   -$180 billion
Second Change in Consumption = -$162 billion
•• ••
•• ••
•• ••
Total Change in Output = -$2000 billion

Explanation: A decline in investment spending by 200 billion causes a decline in income by 200 billion. Since the MPC is 0.9, the consumption decline by 200*0.9 = 180 billion. This 180 billion decline in consumption further causes a decline in Income by 180 billion. Thus the consumption further falls by 180*0.9 = 162 billion.

Total change in income = multiplier*change in investment = 10*200 = 2000 billion.

Now, taxes = 0.05, Marginal propensity to Import MPI = 0.1

Multiplier = 1/MPS + MPI + Tax = 1/0.1+0.1+0.5 = 1/0.25 = 4

Total change in income = multiplier*change in investment = 4*200 = 800 billion.

Please give a thumbs up if you found the answer helpful.


Related Solutions

1. The multiplier effect Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no international...
1. The multiplier effect Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no international trade. Households spend $0.50 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.50. If there are no taxes and no international trade, the oversimplified multiplier for this economy is . Suppose investment spending in this economy decreases by $100 billion. The decrease in investment will lead to a decrease in income, generating a decrease in consumption that decreases income yet again, and...
Consider the simple spending multiplier where there are no taxes. This multiplier: a. is less than...
Consider the simple spending multiplier where there are no taxes. This multiplier: a. is less than 1 b. is smaller than the tax multiplier in absolute value c. is greater than 1 d. is equal to 1
3. The spending multiplier effect Consider a hypothetical economy. Households spend $0.75 of each additional dollar...
3. The spending multiplier effect Consider a hypothetical economy. Households spend $0.75 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.25. The spending multiplier for this economy is. Suppose investment in this economy increases by $100 billion. The increase in investment will lead to an increase in income, generating an increase in consumption that increases income yet again, and so on. Fill in the following table to show the impact of the change in investment on the first...
Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no international trade. Households spend $0.90 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.10.
Consider a hypothetical economy where there are no taxes and no international trade. Households spend $0.90 of each additional dollar they earn and save the remaining $0.10. If there are no taxes and no international trade, the oversimplified multiplier for this economy is $_______.Suppose investment spending in this economy increases by $200 billion. The increase in investment will lead to an increase in income, generating an increase in consumption that increases income yet again, and so on.Fill in the following...
1. Consider an economy with no international trade, no government spending and no taxes, whose consumption...
1. Consider an economy with no international trade, no government spending and no taxes, whose consumption function and investment function are given by the following equations: C = 100,000 + .92Y I = 40,000 a. What is the equilibrium level of aggregate output for this economy? b. What is the saving function for this economy? c. Check the solution, as we did in class, by showing that at the equilibrium level of Y total spending exactly matches the level of...
Consider a hypothetical economy where: • C(Yd) = 105 + 0.8 × (Y − T) •...
Consider a hypothetical economy where: • C(Yd) = 105 + 0.8 × (Y − T) • I(r) = 74 − 1 × r • G = 65 • T = 50 1. Using the information above, write out the planned Aggregate Expenditure equation. 2. Write down an expression for the Investment-Savings (IS) Curve. 3. Assume that inflation is zero, so that i = r. This economy’s central bank follows a given Monetary Policy Rule: r = i = 0.003 ×...
Consider a hypothetical economy where: • C(Yd) = 105 + 0.8 × (Y − T) •...
Consider a hypothetical economy where: • C(Yd) = 105 + 0.8 × (Y − T) • I(r) = 74 − 1 × r • G = 65 • T = 50 1. Using the information above, write out the planned Aggregate Expenditure equation. 2. Write down an expression for the Investment-Savings (IS) Curve. 3. Assume that inflation is zero, so that i = r. This economy’s central bank follows a given Monetary Policy Rule: r = i = 0.003 ×...
If the economy is at full employment, increases in government spending: A) have a multiplier effect...
If the economy is at full employment, increases in government spending: A) have a multiplier effect on equilib rium output. B) have no effect on the aggregate price level. C) are primarily absorbed by price increases. D) reduce aggregate output
Why does a reduction in taxes have a smaller multiplier effect than an increase in government...
Why does a reduction in taxes have a smaller multiplier effect than an increase in government spending of an equal amount? Tucker, Irvin B.. Macroeconomics for Today (Page 323). South-Western College Pub. Kindle Edition.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 1.Explain the effect of a discretionary cut in taxes of $40 billion on the economy...
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 1.Explain the effect of a discretionary cut in taxes of $40 billion on the economy when the economy’s marginal propensity to consume is .75. How does this discretionary fiscal policy differ from a discretionary increase in government spending of $40 billion? 2.Explain what is meant by a built-in stabilizer and give two examples. 3.Differentiate between discretionary fiscal policy and nondiscretionary or built-in stabilization policy. 4.What does the “standardized budget” measure and of what significance is this concept? 6.What are...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT