Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A group of researchers hypothesize that broken bones will take longer to heal among smokers versus...

A group of researchers hypothesize that broken bones will take longer to heal among smokers versus nonsmokers. They test this question with a sample of 20 smokers, where the average time to heal was 32 days (SS = 1161), and a sample of 45 nonsmokers, where the average time to heal was 21 days (SS = 1179). Use the critical-value approach for the appropriate statistical test (where α = .05) to determine if there is a significant difference in bone healing time between smokers and nonsmokers. 1. Identify the alternative hypothesis 2. List your degrees of freedom 3. List your estimated standard error 4. List your t test statistic (where: smokers – nonsmokers) 5. List your critical t value(s) 6. Is the difference in healing time between smokers and nonsmokers statistically significant? (Yes/No) 7. Calculate Cohen’s d for the difference in healing time

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given

Sample size

For smokers = 20

Non smokers = 45

The average time to heal was 32 days (SS = 1161)

The average time to heal was 21 days (SS = 1179)

1)

Ha: Alternative Hypothesis: 1 > 2

(The broken bones will take longer to heal among smokers versus nonsmokers) (Claim)

2)

Degrees of Freedom = 20 + 45 - 2 = 63

Our degrees of freedom = 63

3)

n1 = 20

n2 = 45

1 = 32

2 = 21

Pooled Standard Deviation is given by:

Our estimated standard error = 1.638

4)

Test Statistic is given by:

Our t test statistic = 6.716

5)

At = 0.05

From Table, critical value of t = 1.669

Our critical t value = 1.669

6)

Yes , the difference in healing time between smokers and nonsmokers statistically significant

7)

Cohen's d is given by:

Cohen’s d for the difference in healing time = 1.8051

If you have any doubts please comment and please don't dislike.

PLEASE GIVE ME A LIKE. ITS VERY IMPORTANT FOR ME.


Related Solutions

A group of researchers has developed a method that they hypothesize will improve the reading ability...
A group of researchers has developed a method that they hypothesize will improve the reading ability of at-risk 1st grade students. They randomly selected nine students to participate in their study. The nine students were administered a reading test, then trained for 10 weeks using the new reading program, and then readministered the reading test. The following data are their scores: Subject   1st Reading 2nd Reading                   Score            Score     1               23                19     2               20                19     3               24                 21     4               24                24     5               24                22     6               19                17     7               17                15     8               18                16     9               20                18 What...
4. Among 198 smokers who underwent a “sustained care” program, 51 were no longer smoking after...
4. Among 198 smokers who underwent a “sustained care” program, 51 were no longer smoking after 6 months. Among 199 smokers who underwent an “standard care” program 30 were no longer smoking after six months. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim the rate of success for smoking cessation is greater with the sustained care program.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT