In: Statistics and Probability
One criticism of racial profiling studies is that people’s driving frequency is often unaccounted for. This is a problem because, all else being equal, people who spend more time on the road are more likely to get pulled over eventually. The following table contains PPCS data narrowed down to black male respondents. The variables measure driving frequency and whether these respondents had been stopped by police for traffic offenses within the past 12 months. With an alpha of .01, conduct a five-step hypothesis test to determine if the variables are independent.
Driving Frequency | Yes | No | Raw Marginal |
Almost Every Day | 214 | 946 | 1,160 |
Often | 32 | 238 | 270 |
Rarely | 6 | 360 | 366 |
Column Marginal | 252 | 1,544 | N = 1,796 |
Null hypothesis, H0: the variables i.e. respondents had been stopped by police for traffic offenses within the past 12 months and Driving Frequency are independent
Alternative hypothesis, H1: the variables are not independent.
Observed Frequencies:
Driving Frequency | Yes | No | Raw Marginal |
Almost Every Day | 214=O11 | 946=O12 | 1,160=O10 |
Often | 32=O21 | 238=O22 | 270=O20 |
Rarely | 6=O31 | 360=O32 | 366=O30 |
Column Marginal | 252=O01 | 1,544=O02 | 1,796=N |
Expected frequencies:
Driving Frequency | Yes | No |
Almost Every Day | 162.7617=E11 | 997.2383=E12 |
Often | 37.8842=E21 | 232.1158=E22 |
Rarely | 51.3541=E31 | 314.6459=E32 |
Hence there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variables are independent.