In: Accounting
Bronx Resources Company (BRC) has several divisions. However, only two divisions transfer products to other divisions. The Mining Division refines component K72, which is then transferred to the Metals Division. The component K72 is processed into an alloy by the Metals Division, and the alloy is sold to customers at a price of $150 per unit. The mining division is currently required by BRC to transfer its total yearly output of 400,000 units of component K72 to the Metals Division at total actual manufacturing cost plus 10 percent. Unlimited quantities of component K72 can be purchased and sold on the open market at $90 per unit. While the Mining Division could sell all the component K72 it produces at $90 per unit on the open market, it would incur a selling variable cost of $5 per unit.
Bill Adams, manager of the Mining Division, is unhappy with having to transfer the entire output of component K72 to the Metals Division at 110 percent of cost. In a meeting with the management of BRC, he said, “Why should my division be required to sell component K72 to the Metals Division at less than market price? For the year ended in May, Metals contribution was just over $19 million on sales of 400,000 units, while Mining’s contribution was just over $5 million on the transfer of the same number of units. My division is subsidizing the profitability of the Metals Division. We should be allowed to charge the market price for component K72 when transferring to the Metals Division.”
The following table shows the detailed unit cost structure for both the Mining and Metals divisions during the most recent year:
Mining Division Metal Division
Transfer price from Mining Division - $66
Direct material $12 $6
Direct labor $16 $20
Manufacturing overhead (note 1) $32
Manufacturing overhead (note 2) $25
Total cost per unit $60 $117
Note 1: Manufacturing overhead cost in the Mining Division is 25% fixed and 75% percent variable.
Note 2: Manufacturing overhead cost in the Metals Division is 60% fixed and 40% percent variable.
Required: You must provide all the detailed supporting calculations.
Answer
A) Transfer prices based on total actual costs
Transfer prices should not be based on actual costs, because such a practice would allow an inefficient producing division to pass its excess production costs on to the buying division in the transfer price. The actual cost as the basis for transfer price is not appropriate as it leads to an unfair assessment of the performance of the divisions.
B) If market price as the transfer price, then contribution margin for both the Mining division and the Metals Division is as follows
Particular | Minning Division | Metal Division | ||
A | Total units | 400000 | 400000 | GIVEN |
B | Market price | 90 | 150 | GIVEN |
C | Direct material | 12 | 6 | GIVEN |
D | Direct labour | 16 | 20 | GIVEN |
E | Variable Overhead @ mining -75% metal division - 40% |
24 | 10 | Mining = 32*75% metal = 25*40% |
F | Divisional transer | 0 | 90 | GIVEN |
G | Contribution | 38 | 24 | B-C-D-E-F |
H | Total contribution | 15200000 | 9600000 | A*G |
C)
Minimum Transfer Price = Variable Cost + Opportunity Cost - avoidable cost
here variable cost = 12+16+24 = 54
Opportunity cost is a contribution that can be earned by selling outside = (90-54) = 38
Avoidable cost is the cost which won't occur when transfer between division here it is the additional variable cost of $5
SO minimum transfer price = 54+38-5
=$ 85
D) If BRC was to institute the use of negotiated transfer prices and allow divisions to buy and sell on the open market, the price range for component K72 that would be acceptable to both the Mining Division and Metals Division should be between the minimum transfer price and market price .i.e from to 85 to 90 ( As calculated above)
E) negotiated transfer price is most likely to elicit desirable management behavior at BRC