In: Physics
Solution:
Downcoding is often utilized as a means of avoiding red flags or suspicion of fraud. This method is counter-
intuitive, as downcoding is often just as damaging as upcoding – though for some different reasons. Downcoding
occurs because of insufficient documentation that fails to assign levels of services to the highest levels of specificity.
Whereas;
Upcoding involves billing and/or reporting a higher-level service, or a more complex (expensive) diagnosis than
what is reflected in the patient’s true treatment plan. These higher service levels are not supported by medical
necessity, facts, or even provider documentation. Medicare pays for physician services with Evaluation and
Management (E/M) codes, which rely heavily upon medical necessity being confirmed for each level of service
reported. Upcoding has proven to be an issue in Evaluation and Management audits because the reporting of high
levels of service equals more money in the provider’s pocket.
Hence;
Both upcoding and downcoding can occur by mistake or as a deliberately deceptive practice. While they are
distinctly different, both are a serious compliance risk for medical practices and increase healthcare costs for
patients.Downcoding may not be financially harmful to payers, but it does lead to the misallocation of funds.
To solve these issues:
One of the most effective ways to detect and eliminate upcoding and downcoding is to perform periodic internal
audits. You may also be better off contracting out your coding needs, since many practices are losing thousands in
revenue due to poor coding practices