In: Finance
1. When a warrant is issued by the company, and when a warrant
is exercised, the number of shares increases. A call option is a
contract between investors and does not affect the number of shares
of the firm.
2. a.
If the stock price is less than the exercise price of the warrant
at expiration, the warrant is worthless. Prior to expiration,
however, the warrant will have value as long as there is some
probability that the stock price will rise above the exercise price
in the time remaining until expiration. Therefore, if the stock
price is below the exercise price of the warrant, the lower bound
on the price of the warrant is zero.
b. If the stock price is above the exercise price of the warrant,
the warrant must be worth at least the difference between these two
prices. If warrants were selling for less than the difference
between the current stock price and the exercise price, an investor
could earn an arbitrage profit (i.e. an immediate cash inflow) by
purchasing warrants, exercising them immediately, and selling the
stock.
c. If the warrant is selling for more than the stock, it would be
cheaper to purchase the stock than to purchase the warrant, which
gives its owner the right to buy the stock. Therefore, an upper
bound on the price of any warrant is the firm’s current stock
price.
3. An increase in the stock price volatility increases the bond
price. If the stock price becomes more volatile, the conversion
option on the stock becomes more valuable.
4. The two components of the value of a convertible bond are the
straight bond value and the option value. An increase in interest
rates decreases the straight value component of the convertible
bond. Conversely, an increase in interest rates increases the value
of the equity call option. Generally, the effect on the straight
bond value will be much greater, so we would expect the bond value
to fall, although not as much as the decrease in a comparable
straight bond.
5. When warrants are exercised, however, the number of shares
outstanding increases. This results in the value of the firm being
spread out over a larger number of shares, often leading to a
decrease in value of each individual share. The decrease in the
per-share price of a company’s stock due to a greater number of
shares outstanding is known as dilution.
6. In an efficient capital market the difference between the market
value of a convertible bond and the value of straight bond is the
fair price investors pay for the call option that the convertible
or the warrant provides.
7. There are three potential reasons: 1) To match cash flows, that
is, they issue securities whose cash flows match those of the firm.
2) To bypass assessing the risk of the company (risk synergy). For
example, the risk of company start-ups is hard to evaluate. 3) To
reduce agency costs associated with raising money by providing a
package that reduces bondholder-stockholder conflicts.8. Because
the holder of the convertible has the option to wait and perhaps do
better than what is implied by current stock prices.
9. Theoretically conversion should be forced as soon as the
conversion value reaches the call price because other conversion
policies will reduce shareholder value. If conversion is forced
when conversion values are above the call price, bondholders will
be allowed to exchange less valuable bonds for more valuable common
stock. In the opposite situation, shareholders are giving
bondholders the excess value.
10. No, the market price of the warrant will not equal zero. Since
there is a chance that the market price of the stock will rise
above the $21 per share exercise price before expiration, the
warrant still has some value. Its market price will be greater than
zero. As a practical matter, warrants that are far out-
of-the-money may sell at 0, due to transaction costs.