The recent global economic
downturn has caused many companies to cut back r consider cutting
back their training and development budgets. What might the
implications of such actions be, both in the short term and the
long term?
Economic recessions are often portrayed as short-term events.
However, as a substantial body of economic literature shows, the
consequences of high unemployment, falling incomes, and reduced
economic activity can have lasting consequences.
Findings include:
- Educational achievement: Unemployment and
income losses can reduce educational achievement by threatening
early childhood nutrition; reducing families’ abilities to provide
a supportive learning environment (including adequate health care,
summer activities, and stable housing); and by forcing a delay or
abandonment of college plans.
- Opportunity: Recession-induced job and income
losses can have lasting consequences on individuals and families.
The increase in poverty that will occur as a result of the
recession, for example, will have lasting consequences for kids,
and will impose long-lasting costs on the economy.
- Private investment: Total non-residential
investment is down by 20% from peak levels through the second
quarter of 2009. The reduction in investment will lead to reduced
production capacity for years to come. Furthermore, since
technology is often embedded in new capital equipment, the
investment slowdown can also be expected to reduce the adoption of
new innovations.
- Entrepreneurial activity and business
formation: New and small businesses are often at the
forefront of technological advancement. With the credit crunch and
the reduction in consumer demand, small businesses are seeing a
double squeeze. For example, in 2008, 43,500 businesses filed for
bankruptcy, up from 28,300 businesses in 2007 and more than double
the 19,700 filings in 2006. Only 21 active firms had an initial
public offering in 2008, down from an average of 163 in the four
years prior.
Long-run impacts:
The traditional analysis of fiscal stimulus typically looks at the
short-run impact of fiscal policy on GDP and job creation in the
near term. However, economists have long recognized that short-run
economic conditions can have lasting impacts. For example, job loss
and falling incomes can force families to delay or forgo a college
education for their children. Frozen credit markets and depressed
consumer spending can stop the creation of otherwise vibrant small
businesses. Larger companies may delay or reduce spending on
R&D.
In each of these cases, an economic recession can lead to
“scarring”—that is, long-lasting damage to individuals’ economic
situations and the economy more broadly. The following sections
detail some of what is known about how recessions can lead to
long-term damage.
- Economic damage
- Recessions result in higher unemployment, lower wages and
incomes, and lost opportunities more generally. Education, private
capital investments, and economic opportunity are all likely to
suffer in the current downturn, and the effects will be long-lived.
While economies often see rapid growth during recovery periods (as
unused capacity is returned to work), the drag due to the long-term
damage will still prevent the recovery from reaching its full
potential.
- Education
- As noted by many researchers, education—or “human
capital”—plays a critical role in driving economic growth. As such,
factors that lead to fewer years of educational attainment for the
nation’s youth will have substantial consequences for years to
come.
- Recessions can impact educational achievement in a number of
ways. First, a substantial body of literature addresses the
importance of early childhood education. Because education at this
level (either pre-k or even earlier) is primarily driven by
parental options and funding, factors that reduce families’
resources will impact the level and quality of education available
to their children.
- Opportunity
- There can be no doubt that recessions and high levels of
unemployment lead to reduced economic opportunity for individuals
and families. Job loss, reductions in incomes, and increases in
poverty all result in losses to individuals and the broader
economy.
- To take just one example of lost opportunity, recent research
has found that college graduates entering into the
workforce during a recession will earn less than those entering in
non-recessionary environments. Surprisingly, the findings also
suggest that the income loss is not temporary: lifetime earnings
and occupational paths are affected as well. According to Kahn
(2009) “taken as a whole, the results suggest that the labor market
consequences of graduating from college in a bad economy are large,
negative, and persistent.” She finds an initial wage loss of 6% to
7% for each 1 percentage-point increase in the unemployment rate,
and even after 15 years, the wage loss is still 2.5%.
- Non-college graduates are likely to fare worse. While
unemployment in the most recent recession has increased for all
groups, those with less education and those with lower incomes face
much higher rates than others.
- Job loss
- In the current recession, the unemployment rate has increased
from 4.9% in December 2007 to 9.7% in August this year. There are
currently about 15 million people who are unemployed—twice the
number as at the start of the recession—with roughly 1 in 6 workers
un- or underemployed. About 5 million workers have been unemployed
for more than six months, and these long-term unemployed are the
highest percentage of the total since 1948.
- Loosing one’s job obviously creates problems for most
individuals and families. The income loss can persist for years,
even after a new job is taken (often at a lower salary).
- Although the literature on the impact of job loss is too
extensive to detail here, it is worth noting the evidence presented
by Farber (2005). Using results from the Displaced Workers Survey
through 2003, Farber finds that a job separation is costly: “In the
most recent period (2001-03), about 35% of job losers are not
employed at the subsequent survey date; about 13% re-employed
full-time job losers are holding part-time jobs; full-time job
losers who find new full-time jobs earn about 13% less on average
on their new jobs than on the lost job…”
- The impact of job loss goes well beyond income and earnings,
and can impact one’s mental health (see Murphy and Athanasou (1999)
for a review of 16 prior studies). It is also important to note
that how one fares in a recession depends on a variety of factors.
For example, older workers tend to be over-represented among the
long-term unemployed when compared with other age groups.
- Poverty and wealth
- Simply put, poverty is not good for the economy. When children
grow up in poverty, they are more likely, later in life, to have
low earnings, commit crimes, and have poor health. Holtzer et al.
(2007) estimate the cumulative costs to the economy of childhood
poverty to be about $500 billion per year, or about 4% of GDP.
There is significant evidence that poverty has lasting consequences
for kids, including educational achievement, cognitive development,
and emotional and behavioral outcomes. As noted above, family
income can be expected to impact educational attainment in various
ways, but falling incomes and higher poverty levels also impact
adults’ opportunities as well.
- Wealth also shapes economic opportunities, providing a lifeline
when times are tough (such as a recession) and can finance
additional education, retraining, or the startup costs of a new
business. Unfortunately, a large share of the country has little in
the way of wealth: in 2004 approximately 30% of households had a
net worth of less than $12,000 (Mishel et al. 2009). This problem
is even more severe for certain populations: the median financial
wealth for blacks—which includes liquid and semi-liquid assets such
as mutual funds, trusts, and bank account holdings—was just $300 in
2004.
- Economic mobility
- As noted above, inter-generational mobility—or the lack
thereof—can lead to persistent impacts of recessions.
- Poorer families can lead to less opportunity and worse economic
outcomes for their children through a variety of mechanisms—be it
through nutrition, educational attainment, or access to wealth. A
recession, therefore, should not be thought as a one-time event
that stresses individuals and families for a couple of years.
Rather, economic downturns will impact the future prospects of all
family members, including children, and will have consequences for
years to come.
- A range of findings suggest that economic outcomes— especially
one’s position in the income and wealth distribution—are often
carried over from one to the next (Solon 1992; Hertz 2006). More
directly related to job loss, Oreopoulos et al. (2005) looks at
labor market earnings of children whose fathers experienced a job
loss. Not only did the job loss lead to a persistent loss in family
income, but the next generation also had earnings 9% lower than
similar children whose father did not experience unemployment.
- Private investment
- Perhaps the most obvious areas in which recessions can slow
economic growth is in those of investments and R&D. Economists
have long recognized the central role of investment and technology
as key contributors to economic growth.
- Recessions can and do lead to decreases in investment spending
and the adoption of new technologies. This is a result of at least
four factors. First, an economic downturn will lead to a drop in
demand for firms’ products as customers’ incomes decline, thus
lowering the return to investments. Second, limited access to
credit will limit firms’ ability to invest. Third, recessions are
periods of increased uncertainty that may lead firms to retrench
toward “core” products and production techniques, and therefore
they may be less likely to experiment with new products and
techniques. Finally, we must also consider the interaction between
human and physical capital. Technology is often embedded in new
physical equipment: as production and employment is reduced, there
is less purchasing of newer equipment. As a result, workers are
less able to utilize their skills, and there is less need to
“up-skill” current employees or hire additional employees with new
skills.