A system is composed of 6 components having reliabilities of 0.92, 0.95, 0.99, 0.92, 0.96, and...

A system is composed of 6 components having reliabilities of 0.92, 0.95, 0.99, 0.92, 0.96, and 0.97. Which is the more reliable design: high-level redundancy with 3 of each component or low-level redundancy with 2 of each component? Compare the system reliabilities.

Expert Solution

Given Information:

A system is composed of 6 components having reliabilities of 0.92, 0.95, 0.99, 0.92, 0.96, and 0.97.

A high-level redundancy with 3 of each component is a combination of 3 units in series separately and a low-level redundancy is a design of 3 parallel units each having 2 components.

Let us assume that first three and last three components are in series combined parallelly.

The system reliability in case of a high-level redundancy is given by:

The system reliability in case of a low-level redundancy is given by:

The low level redundancy is better as it has high reliability.

orchestra answered 2 years ago

A system, which is composed of two components, will func- tion as long as at least...

A system, which is composed of two components, will func- tion as long as at least one of the two components func- tions. When both components are operating, the lifetime distribution of each is exponential with mean 1. However, the distribution of the remaining lifetime of the good com- ponent, after one fails, is exponential mean 1 . (The idea 2 is that after one component fails the other component car- ries twice the load and hence has only half...

A system is composed of five components, each of which is either working or failed. Consider...

A system is composed of five components, each of which is either working or failed. Consider an experiment that consists of observing the status of each component, and let the outcome of the experiment be given by the vector (x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) where xi is equal to 1 if component i is working and is equal to 0 if component i has failed. Suppose that two components are working and three components have failed. In how many ways...

Consider n components of a system having independently exponentially distributed lifetimes so that Xn ~ exp(θ)...

Consider n components of a system having independently exponentially distributed lifetimes so that Xn ~ exp(θ) a) For a single component, find the reliability to time t1 + t2 given that the component has already lived past time t1. Why is the constant failure rate referred to as the “memory-less” property? b) For the series of n components, find an expression for Rs(t). What is the mean lifetime of the system?

Question 5. Consider n components of a system having independently exponentially distributed lifetimes so that Xn...

Question 5. Consider n components of a system having independently exponentially distributed lifetimes so that Xn ~ exp(θ) a) For a single component, find the reliability to time t1 + t2 given that the component has already lived past time t1. Why is the constant failure rate referred to as the “memory-less” property? b) For the series of n components, find an expression for Rs(t). What is the mean lifetime of the system?

State (2), explain (2), and derive (6) Gibbs’ Phase rule for a system with C components...

State (2), explain (2), and derive (6) Gibbs’ Phase rule for a system with C components occurring in P different phases.

Question