In: Accounting
Patty’s Pots (PP) manufactures large plastic pots for nurseries to grow large tropical plants for hotels and offices. Demand for the pots is fairly even throughout the year.
The pots are manufactured at PP’s plant in Chilliwack, BC. The company has enjoyed significant growth over its five years of operations. As such, Patty Wong, the owner, and CEO of the company would like to ensure the plant is operating efficiently. She has hired you, as a consultant to review the company’s manufacturing and inventory practices.
To assist with your analysis, Patty asked her cost accountant to summarize some of the key financial figures relating to inventory:
Patty is considering the installation of a just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing system to reduce PP’s costs and be responsive to demand. She has already consulted with an industrial engineer to learn more about how to rearrange her shop floor and create a lean manufacturing environment. Costs and resulting benefits of implementing JIT are as follows:
Overall, PP expects a return of 15% on all its investments.
(Required begins on the next page)
Required:
Show all calculations and provide a response to Patty which
includes pertinent figures from your calculations.
a) Inventory control
i) Total annual relavent cost of ordering and carrying inventory
A relevant cost is a cost that differs between alternatives being considered. In order for a cost to be a relevant cost it must be:
Therefore total relevant cost of ordering and carrying inventory includes;
Cost | $ |
Ordering cost(380*12) | 4560 |
Carrying cost(182160 kg * 8.80) | 1603008 |
Total relevant cost of ordering and carrying inventory | 1607568 |
Notes-:
ii) Optimal order size using EOQ
EOQ= √((2CoD)/CH)
Where:
D- Annual demand
Co - Cost of one order
CH - Holding cost(one unit per year)
Given;
D=182160
Co= 380 per order
CH= 8.80 per kg
Therefore,
EOQ = √((2*380*182160)/8.8)
=√15732000
= 3966.36 kg
So, the optimal order size using EOQ is 3966.36kg per order
iii) The savings incurred in ordering while implementing JIT
Savings | $ |
40% savings in cost of quality defectassessment(150000*40%) | 60000 |
40% savings in setup cost(350000*40%) | 140000 |
Total savings | 200000 |
The savings incurred in ordering while implementing JIT inventory system is $.20000
iv) Effect on inventory ordering and carrying cost & solution to reduce it
There will be no effect on the inventory carrying and ordering cost through hiring an industrial engineer. Hiring an industrial engineer can only help in improving the manufacturing efficiency and thereby product quantity. He cannot able to reduce the cost of ordering and carrying the inventory.
The solution to reduce ordering and carrying cosy of inventory are;
b)Proposed JIT manufacturing system
i.Relevant manufacturing costs/savings;
Cost/(Savings) | $ |
One time cost to rearrange the floor | 475000 |
Savings in cost of defects assessment (40%*150000) | (60000) |
Savings in setup cost(40%*350000) | (140000) |
16% premium on production supplies (16%*520000) | 83200 |
Cost of retaining the workforce (not relevant) | 0 |
ii. Advantage and disadvantage of JIT
Advantage | Disadvantage |
There is no holding cost. | Higher ordering cost as orders have to be placed frequently. |
Better quality of outputs. | Cannot plan production in advance. |
Less risk of obsolescence as there is no holding of inventory. | May face inventory shortage situation. |