In: Accounting
Lavalier Company developed the following budgeted life-cycle income statement for two proposed products. Each product's life cycle is expected to be two years.
Product AA | Product BB | Total | |
Sales | $400,000 | $350,000 | $750,000 |
Cost of goods sold | 300,000 | 200,000 | 500,000 |
Gross profit | $100,000 | $150,000 | $250,000 |
Period expenses: | |||
Research and development | (100,000) | ||
Marketing | (75,000) | ||
Life-cycle income | $75,000 |
A 12 percent return on sales is required for new products. Because
the proposed products did not have a 12 percent return on sales,
the products were going to be dropped.
Relative to Product BB, Product AA requires more research and
development costs but fewer resources to market the product.
Sixty-five percent of the research and development costs are
traceable to Product AA, and 40 percent of the marketing costs are
traceable to Product AA.
If research and development costs and marketing costs are traced to
each product, life-cycle income for Product BB would be
a.$90,000.
b.$105,000.
c.$70,000.
d.$150,000.
Awesome Products Company manufactures a product sold to retailers. It is considering suppliers for its process. The supplier quality involves four activity areas:
Activity Area | Cost Driver and Rate |
Order cost | $120 per purchase order |
Defective units | $200 per unit internal failure costs |
Delivery trips | $5 per delivery |
Carrying cost | $1 per order |
The following supplier information is given:
X3 | Y2 | Z1 | |
Materials units needed | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Actual purchase price | $5 | $4.99 | $5.01 |
Number of purchase orders | 20 | 30 | 18 |
Number of defects | 6 | 12 | 0 |
Number of deliveries | 20 | 30 | 18 |
Which supplier is least costly?
a.Y2
b.X3
c.Z1
d.They are equally costly.
Question 1
Answer C $70,000
Product AA | working | Product BB | working | Total | |
Sales | $400,000 | $350,000 | $750,000 | ||
Cost of goods sold | 300,000 | 200,000 | 500,000 | ||
Gross profit | $100,000 | $150,000 | $250,000 | ||
Period expenses: | |||||
Research and development | -65000 | (100000X.65) | -35000 | (10000X.35) | (100,000) |
Marketing | -30000 | (75000X.4) | -45000 | (75000X.6) | (75,000) |
Life-cycle income | $5,000 | $70,000 | $75,000 |
Question 2
OptionC Z1
Z1 is least costly
Particulars | X3 | Y2 | Z1 |
Material units needed | 100000 | 100000 | 100000 |
Actual purchase price | 5 | 4.99 | 5.01 |
Material cost(a) | 500000 | 499000 | 501000 |
no. of purchase order | 20 | 30 | 18 |
order cost per purchase order | 120 | 120 | 120 |
Total ordering cost (b) | 2400 | 3600 | 2160 |
No.of defects | 6 | 12 | 0 |
Defective unit cost | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Total defect cost© | 1200 | 2400 | 0 |
No. of deliveries | 20 | 30 | 18 |
cost per delivery | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Total delivery cost(d) | 100 | 150 | 90 |
Carrying cost per oder | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Totoal orders | 20 | 30 | 18 |
Total carrying cost(e) | 20 | 30 | 18 |
Total cost (a+b+c+d+e) | 503720 | 505180 | 503268 |