In: Economics
How do you think?
Foreign investors will be reluctant to invest in poor countries if their poverty is due to their poor human capital. Because a country lacks skilled workers, it will be difficult to use more advanced technology and machines. So the rate of return on the machine is very low and that explains why capital flows more to rich countries than to poor ones. Well-educated poor countries are more likely to have human resources flowing to rich ones. "Well-educated Indians transfer 14.4 times as much to the US as uneducated Indians," “the skilled would want to move to poor countries, because the skilled wage differential is actually in favor of the rich countries. An engineer in Bombay earns $2,300 per year; an engineer in New York earns $55,000 a year ”
That is all true. Actually Human capital formation (building
more skills in its people) has remained a challege for developing
countries like India. Following points take you futher into the
matter:
Determinants or Sources of Human Formation in a
country:
In light of the above, we certainly get an idea as what kind of
difficulties are faced by the developing countries like India.
However, slowly and steadily, things seem to be improving a little.
With the pace of development rising in countries like India, to an
extent these have been able to check the migration of skilled
labour to foreign lands. Also, thanks to the present restrictive
immigration policies by US and other countries, this problem is
waning out.
Still, we have to accept, India and alike countries have enough
left to do in the direction of improving on human capital index and
provide enough good opportunities to the skilled labour in-land
only.
Role of human capital in economic growth:
Challenges faced by developing countries like India: