Question

In: Operations Management

Prepare a legal Brief for one of the following upcoming Supreme Court Cases: A) Google LLC...

Prepare a legal Brief for one of the following upcoming Supreme Court Cases:

A) Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.
- Does copyright protection extend to a software interface? Does petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitute fair use?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Legal Brief:

Style:   Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.

           California Supreme Court

Procedural History:

At preliminary hearing, the plaintiff won due to lack of cause (Federal Circuit held decision in favour of Plaintiff).

Defendant won lack of cause. Applets court revised (Next hearing Plaintiff lost case)

Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s decision due to lack of causes (In favour of Oracle (plaintiff))

Google filed a case as cert petition with the Supreme Court in order to review both Federal Circuit decisions.

Issue:

  1. Weather the Java APIs in question were protected under copyright. Does copyright protection extend to a software interface?
  2. Does petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitute fair use?

Rules:

  1. Section 102(b) of copyright protection does not extend to non-copyrightable elements. “These are any idea, procedure, process, and system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.”
  2. Merger doctrine– It states that if there is limited ways to express any idea, copyright law not protect expression as it is merged with the idea.

Way Forward:

The order of court does not forecloses the copyright protection as the copyright protection is extended to software interface too. The petitioner uses the software interface in the context of creating a new computer program which does not constitute a fair use.


Related Solutions

explain how to understand what the Supreme Court does and how to understand the cases it...
explain how to understand what the Supreme Court does and how to understand the cases it hears in America. Please be comprehensive about the whole process.
Analyse the Supreme Court’s rulings in the Gratz and Grutter cases. Why does the court allow...
Analyse the Supreme Court’s rulings in the Gratz and Grutter cases. Why does the court allow race to be used in one case anc not the other? how is the court using Scrutiny?
Two of the most important Supreme Court cases dealing with long arm jurisdiction are the International...
Two of the most important Supreme Court cases dealing with long arm jurisdiction are the International Shoe case (in the text) and the Worldwide Volkswagen v. Woodson (Supreme Court website or other source) case. What is the minimum contacts standard? How does it work, and when is it applied?
Three different tests are used by the Supreme Court as standards in reviewing cases which raise...
Three different tests are used by the Supreme Court as standards in reviewing cases which raise issues of equal protection. What are the three tests? When is each applied? In your opinion, why have different tests been developed?
Explain using several examples, what types of cases the Supreme Court of Erie County and the...
Explain using several examples, what types of cases the Supreme Court of Erie County and the Western District of New York, United States District Court have Subject Matter Jurisdiction over?
brief the following in IRAC format, Commissioner v. Kowalski US Supreme court [434 US 77; 1977]
brief the following in IRAC format, Commissioner v. Kowalski US Supreme court [434 US 77; 1977]
Write a Case Brief on one of the following cases in a similar format to the...
Write a Case Brief on one of the following cases in a similar format to the example case brief below. (Please write in format where I can copy and paste) Case 22.1 Contemporary Cars, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Case 22.2 Staffing Network Holdings, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board. Case 22.3 Unite Here! Local 5 v. National Labor Relations Board. EXAMPLE CASE BRIEF: Rael v. Cadena, 93 N.M. 684, 604 P.2d 822 (Ct. App. 1979) Parties: Eddie Rael,...
Legal changes create new entrepreneurial opportunities. Take for instance, the Supreme Court decision that permitted lawyers...
Legal changes create new entrepreneurial opportunities. Take for instance, the Supreme Court decision that permitted lawyers to advertise and promote their services. Questions: (A) Explain how it has changed the legal profession (B) Identify a specific legal firm that you see exploiting this particular court ruling (C) Identify some regulatory changes in the area of Clean Environment and resulting opportunities for new venture creation (use specific examples/cases to explain your position)
In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer...
In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer in Michigan challenged the process of selecting the jury pool in the trial of his accused client. Here are the facts: • About 7.28% of the citizens in the court’s jurisdiction were black. • The jury pool had between 60 and 100 members, only 3 of whom were black. 1. Is there enough evidence that conclude that the court is biased? Carry out an...
Case 16.3 Stonhard, Inc. v. Blue Ridge Farms, LLC New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second...
Case 16.3 Stonhard, Inc. v. Blue Ridge Farms, LLC New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 114 A.D.3d 757, 980 N.Y.S.2d 507 (2014). Background and Facts Who is liable when the installer of food plant flooring is not paid? Stonhard, Inc., makes epoxy and urethane flooring and installs it in industrial and commercial buildings. Marvin Sussman entered into a contract with Stonhard to install flooring at Blue Ridge Farms, LLC, a food-manufacturing facility in Brooklyn, New York. Sussman did...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT