Question

In: Economics

Two firms are involved in an infinitely repeated game. If they cooperate on pricing, they can...

Two firms are involved in an infinitely repeated game. If they cooperate on pricing, they can split the monopoly profit, each earning $500 per period. But if one firm undercuts slightly, then the firm that undercuts can collect the entire monopoly profit of $1000.The firms interact repeatedly and attempt to cooperate using the following strategy: Let’s start by splitting the monopoly profit. If anyone ever undercuts, we’ll revert to the competitive outcome in the following period, and both of us will earn a profit of 0 forever after.

a.For what values of the interest rate will firms cooperate? For what values of the interest

rate is cooperation impossible?

b.

Suppose, instead of the competitive outcome and a profit of zero, that the punishment for undercutting is to revert to a duopoly game where both firms earn a profit of $400 per period. For what values of the interest rate will firms cooperate now? Is cooperation easie

or more difficult than in (a)

? Provide an economic interpretation.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A) Both the firms will follow the grim trigger strategy. This implies punsihment is given forever once any of the firm undercuts. Hence there are two outcome possible for this subgame: split the monopoly profit for all periods including the current one or competitive profit in all periods as the punishment is given forever.

For the first case, each firm's payoff is 500 for infinite period.  

If a firm undercuts and deviates in first period it will be able to secure 1000 in that period but will receive 0 for each period forever. Hence the payoff is 1000 + 0d + 0d2 + ... = 1000(1 -d) + 0d = 1000 - 1000d . Firm has no incentive to deviate if the payoff from not deviating exceed the payoff from deviating:

500 > or = 1000 - 1000d

-500 > or -1000d

d >or = 1/2

Interest rate should be d > or = 1/2 so that cooperation is possible.

B) Again both the firms will follow the grim trigger strategy. Punsihment is given forever once any of the firm undercuts. Hence there are two outcome possible for this subgame: split the monopoly profit for all periods including the current one or duopoly profit in all periods as the punishment is given forever.

Each firm's payoff is 500 for infinite period under cooperation  

If any firm deviates in first period it will be able to secure 1000 in that period but will receive only 400 for each period forever. Hence the payoff is 1000 + 400d + 400d2 + ... = 1000(1 - d) + 400d = 1000 - 600d . Firm has no incentive to deviate if the payoff from not deviating exceed the payoff from deviating:

500 > or = 1000 - 600d

-500 > or = – 600d

d > or = 5/6

Interest rate should be > or = 5/6 so that cooperation is possible. In part a it is easier to cooperate because the interest rate is lower and threat is more credible.


Related Solutions

Two firms are involved in an infinitely repeated game. If they cooperate on pricing, they can...
Two firms are involved in an infinitely repeated game. If they cooperate on pricing, they can split the monopoly profit, each earning $500 per period. But if one firm undercuts slightly, then the firm that undercuts can collect the entire monopoly profit of $1000. The firms interact repeatedly and attempt to cooperate using the following strategy: Let’s start by splitting the monopoly profit. If anyone ever undercuts, we’ll revert to the competitive outcome in the following period, and both of...
Consider the infinitely repeated game with discount factor E[0,1] of the following variant of the Prisoner's...
Consider the infinitely repeated game with discount factor E[0,1] of the following variant of the Prisoner's Dilemma game: Player 2 L C R T (6, 6) (-1, 7) (-2, 8) Player 1 M (7, -1) (4, 4) (-1, 5) B (8, -2) (5, -1) (1,1) A) For which values of the discount factor E[0,1] can the players support the pair of actions (M, C) played in every period? B) For which values of the discount factor E[0,1] can the players...
Consider a repeated prisoner’s dilemma game that will be repeated for one million rounds. 1. If...
Consider a repeated prisoner’s dilemma game that will be repeated for one million rounds. 1. If this game is played by immortal rational utility maximizers, what is the Nash equilibrium for this repeated game? 2. If this game was played as an experiment using human players, would you expect to see this strategy? 3. If this game was played as an experiment with rational utility maximizers who have a maximum lifespan of 500,000 rounds, what is the Nash equilibrium for...
In forming a cartel: Select one: a. all firms will cooperate. b. there are no incentives...
In forming a cartel: Select one: a. all firms will cooperate. b. there are no incentives to cheat. c. there are no incentives to cooperate. d. there are incentives to cheat. In 2011, 11 modeling agencies in Singapore were found to have acted together in raising prices of modeling services. These firms acted as a: Select one: a. disunion. b. cartel. c. co-op. d. Bertrand monopoly. Cartels are: Select one: a. extremely powerful and able to keep prices and profits...
Consider the Stage Game below, and consider the repeated game where players play twice (T =...
Consider the Stage Game below, and consider the repeated game where players play twice (T = 2). Payoffs for each agent are simply period one plus period two payoffs. L C R T 6,6 0,7 1,2 M 7,0 1,1 2,0 B 2,1 0,1 3,3 (a) Do any strategies dominate any other? (b) What are the two NE of the Stage Game? What is the difference between the two? (c) Call the TL strategy profile (1 plays T, 2 plays L)...
Four firms (A, B, C, and D) play a simultaneous-move pricing game. Each firm (i) may...
Four firms (A, B, C, and D) play a simultaneous-move pricing game. Each firm (i) may choose any price Pi ∈ [0, ∞) with the goal of maximizing its own profit. (Firms do not care directly about their own quantity or others’ profits.) Firms A and B have MC = 10, while firms C and D have MC = 20. The firms serve a market with the demand curve Q = 100 – P. All firms produce exactly the same...
In a simultaneous pricing game there are two operators. If one of them prices low, he...
In a simultaneous pricing game there are two operators. If one of them prices low, he gets all the customers, a payoff of 12, while other gets zero. If both price high they each get a payoff of 6 and if both price low, they get a payoff of 5. What is the best response of Operator 2 to Operator 1 pricing high? Select one: a. Leave the market b. Also price high c. Price low d. Price at the...
Using game theory, explain how actions by firms in their own self-interest can lead oligopolist firms...
Using game theory, explain how actions by firms in their own self-interest can lead oligopolist firms to suboptimal (from the firms point of view) results.
6. Consider infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma C D C 2,2 -1,3 D 3.-1 0,0 (a) For...
6. Consider infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma C D C 2,2 -1,3 D 3.-1 0,0 (a) For each δ < 1 find the shortest length of punishment that is needed in order to sustain cooperation, or show that the cooperation cannot be sustained. (b) Using the one-shot deviation principle for each δ argue whether tit-for-tat strategy is an SPE or not. The tit-for-tat strategy is to cooperate in period 1. In period t do whatever your opponent did in period t...
Consider the following game in which two firms A and B sell computing product and are...
Consider the following game in which two firms A and B sell computing product and are deciding whether to undertake advertising campaigns. The possible outcomes of this simultaneous one-shot game are illustrated by the payoff matrix (annual profit payoffs in millions). Note: Firm A's payoffs appear first in the payoff pairs: Firm A Firm B Strategy Advertise Don't Advertise Advertise 10, 5 15, 0 Don't advertise 6, 8 20, 2 Use the payoff matrix to answer the questions below. a....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT