In: Math
Practitioners measured spiritual well-being (SWB) in a sample of 16 adults who were alcoholic before and following treatment for alcoholism.
| Change in
SWB Following Treatment |
|
|---|---|
|
+11 |
−1 |
|
+10 |
−6 |
|
−8 |
+13 |
|
+20 |
−5 |
|
+12 |
−2 |
|
−3 |
+7 |
|
+14 |
+15 |
|
+9 |
−4 |
Use the normal approximation for the Wilcoxon signed-ranks T
test to analyze the data above. (Round your answer to two decimal
places.)
z =
State whether to retain or reject the null hypothesis. (Assume
alpha equal to 0.05.)
1. Ranking the differences and affixing a sign to each rank
Rank the dis, ignoring the signs (i.e. assign rank 1 to the smallest |di |, rank 2 to the next etc.)
Label each rank with its sign, according to the sign of di .
| d: Change in SWB Following Treatment | rank | Sign |
| 11 | 11 | + |
| 10 | 10 | + |
| −8 | 8 | - |
| 20 | 16 | + |
| 12 | 12 | + |
| −3 | 3 | - |
| 14 | 14 | + |
| 9 | 9 | + |
| −1 | 1 | - |
| −6 | 6 | - |
| 13 | 13 | + |
| −5 | 5 | - |
| −2 | 2 | - |
| 7 | 7 | + |
| 15 | 15 | + |
| −4 | 4 | - |
2. Calculate W+, the sum of the ranks of the positive differences: d's, and W−, the sum of the ranks of the negative differences d's.
| d: Change in SWB Following Treatment | rank | Sign |
| 11 | 11 | + |
| 10 | 10 | + |
| 20 | 16 | + |
| 12 | 12 | + |
| 14 | 14 | + |
| 9 | 9 | + |
| 13 | 13 | + |
| 7 | 7 | + |
| 15 | 15 | + |
| Total | 107 |
W+ = 107
| d: Change in SWB Following Treatment | rank | Sign |
| −8 | 8 | - |
| −3 | 3 | - |
| −1 | 1 | - |
| −6 | 6 | - |
| −5 | 5 | - |
| −2 | 2 | - |
| −4 | 4 | - |
| Total | 29 |
W- = 29
3. Choose W = min(W−, W+).
W = min (29, 107) = 29
4. Normal approximation :





Z = -2.0166
For two tailed test :



= 0.05
As P-Value i.e. is less than Level of significance i.e (P-value:0.0438 < 0.05:Level of significance); Reject Null Hypothesis
Reject null hypothesis.